Ecological Assessments of Aquatic Environment using Multi-metric Model in Major Nationwide Stream Watersheds

우리나라 주요하천 수계에서 다변수모델을 이용한 생태학적 수환경 평가

  • An, Kwang-Guk (School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Yon (School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Bae, Dae-Yeul (School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Ja-Hyun (School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, Soon-Jin (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Won, Doo-Hee (Doohee Institute of Ecological Research (DIER), Korea Ecosystem Service (KES), Inc.) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kwan (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER)) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Soo (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER))
  • 안광국 (충남대학교 생명과학부) ;
  • 이재연 (충남대학교 생명과학부) ;
  • 배대열 (충남대학교 생명과학부) ;
  • 김자현 (충남대학교 생명과학부) ;
  • 황순진 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 원두희 ((주)생태조사단 부설 두희자연환경연구소) ;
  • 이재관 (국립환경과학원 환경진단연구부) ;
  • 김창수 (국립환경과학원 환경진단연구부)
  • Received : 2006.06.26
  • Accepted : 2006.08.16
  • Published : 2006.09.30

Abstract

The objective of this research was to develop ecological multi-metric models using natural fish assemblages for a diagnosis of current stream health condition, and apply the model to nationwide lotic ecosystems of the Geum River, the Youngsan River, and the Sumjin River. The ecological stream health model was based on the index of biological integrity (IBI), which was originally developed in North American streams by Karr (1981), and the Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP), which was scientifically established by the US EPA (1999). The metric numbers and metric attributes were partially changed for the regional applications, so the scoring criteria was modified for the assessment. Overall, metric values, based on the IBI calculations, reflected conventional water quality characteristics, based on nutrient regime, and agreed with results of staticeco-toxicity tests. Some stations impaired in terms of stream health were identified by the IBI approach, and also major key stressors affecting the stream health were identified by additional evaluations of physical habitats. Our preliminary results suggested that biological integrity in stream ecosystems was largely disturbed by habitat degradation as well as chemical pollutions. This new approach would be used as a key tool for ecological restorations and species conservations in the degraded aquatic ecosystems in Korea and applied for elucidating major causes of ecological disturbances. Ultimately, this approach provides us an effective management strategy of stream ecosystems through establishments of ecological networks in various watersheds.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 물환경종합평가방법 조사연구

Supported by : 환경부

References

  1. 김익수, 박종영, 한국의 민물고기, 교학사 (2002)
  2. 김익수, 한국의 위기당수어류의 서식현황과 보존, 한국생태학회, 한국어류학회공동 심포지엄 - 한국담수생태게의 특성과 어류상 (1995)
  3. 김익수, 한국동식물도감, 37, 동물편 (담수어류) (1997)
  4. 안광국, 이재연, 장하나, 유등천에서의 생태학적 건강도 평가 및 수질양상, 한국육수학회지, 38(3), pp. 341-351 (2005)
  5. 정문기, 한국어도보, 일지사 (1977)
  6. 최기철, 전남의 자연, 담수어편, 한국과학기술진흥재단 (1988)
  7. 최기철, 이규원, 우리민물고기 백가지, 현암사 (1994)
  8. 최기철, 전상린, 김익수, 손영목, 원색 한국담수어 도감, 향문사(2002)
  9. Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D. and Stribling, J. B., Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd Ed. EPA 841-B-99-002 (1999)
  10. Didier, J., Kestemont, D. and Micha, J. C., Indice Biotique d'lntegrite Piscicole Pour Evaluer la Qualite Ecologique des Ecosystemes Aquatiques, la Paix, Namur, Belgium (1996)
  11. Harris, J. H., The Use of Fish in Ecological Assessments, Australian Journal of Ecology, 20, pp. 65-80 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00523.x
  12. Huguency, B., Camara, S., Samoura, B., and Magassouba, M., Applying an Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Communities in a West African River, Hydrobiologia, 331, pp. 71-78 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025409
  13. Judy, R. D., Seeley Jr, P. N., Murray, T. M., Svirsky, S. C., Whitworth, M. R., and Ischinger, L. S., National Fisheries Survey Vol. 1. Technical report: initial findings. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-84/06 (1984)
  14. Karr, J. R. and Dionne, M., Designing Surveys to Assess Biological Integrity in Lakes and Reservoirs, in Biological Criteria, EPA-440/5-91-005, USA. pp. 62-72 (1991)
  15. Karr, J. R., Assessment of Biotic Integrity using Fish Communities, Fisheries, 6, pp. 21-27 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  16. Karr, J. R., Fausch, K. D., Angermeier, P. L., Yant, P. R., and Schlosser, I. J., Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Water: A Method and Its Rationale, p. 28, Illinois National History Survey: Spe. Pub 5., IL, USA (1986)
  17. Koizumi, N. and Matsumiya, Y., Assessment of Stream Fish Habitat based on Index of Biotic Integrity, Bull. Jap. Soc. Oceanogr, 61, pp. 144-156 (1997)
  18. Lyons, J., Navarro-Perez, S., Cochran, P. A., Santana, E., and Guzman-Arroyo, C. M., Index of Biotic Integrity based on Fish Assemblages for the Conservation of Streams and Rivers in West-central Mexico, Conservation Biology, 9, pp. 569-584 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030569.x
  19. Nelson, J. S, Fisheries of the World (3rd eds), John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 600 (1994)
  20. Oberdorff, T. and Hughes, R. M., Modification of an Index of Biotic Integrity based on Fish Assemblages to Characterize Rivers of the Seine Basin, France, Hydrobiologia, 228, pp. 117-130 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006200
  21. Ohio EPA, Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life, Vol.II, users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters, Columbus., Ohio, USA (1987)
  22. Ohio EPA, Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Volume Ill: Standarized Biological Field Sampling and Laboratory Methods for Assessing Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities, Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment Section, Columbus., Ohio (1989a)
  23. Ohio EPA, Addendum to Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life, Volume II: U.S.ers Manual for Biological Field Assessment of Ohio Surface Water, Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment, Ecological Section, Columbus., Ohio (1989b)
  24. Plafkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K. D., Gross, S. K. and Hughes, R. M., Rapid Assessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrats and Fish, EPA/444/4-89-001. U.S. EPA (1989)
  25. U.S. EPA, Fish Field and Laboratory Methods for Evaluating the Biological Integrity of Surface Waters, EPA 600-R-92-111, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (1993)