Performance Study on Pilot-scale Constructed Wetlands in order to Restore Contaminated Stream

오염하천의 정화를 위한 파일럿 규모의 인공습지 적용

  • Kim, Seung-Jun (Water Environment and Remediation Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Su (Water Environment and Remediation Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Bae, Woo-keun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 김승준 (한국과학기술연구원 수질환경 및 복원연구센터) ;
  • 최용수 (한국과학기술연구원 수질환경 및 복원연구센터) ;
  • 배우근 (한양대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2006.01.20
  • Accepted : 2006.04.12
  • Published : 2006.05.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the polluted stream water quality by pilot-scale five different constructed wetlands (CWs). Cell 1 to 3 are newly designed 2SFCW (Surface-subsurface flow CW) with 1 to 3 flow shifters (FS) in the middle of the wetland system. Cell 4 and 5 are control CW (CCW), but Cell 5 is the same type as Cell 3. The FS, which converts the route of surface and subsurface flow between two wetlands connected in series, was able to enhance the treatability of TN via nitrification and denitrification and of SS due to filtration and sedimentation. The void fraction and dispersion number of Cell 1, 2 and 3 obtained from the RTD analysis were found to be 0.73 and 0.17, respectively. COD and TP removal efficiencies of Cell 1 to 3 were similar to that of Cell 4 and 5. SS removal efficiencies of Cell 1 to 3 and 5 with FS were 5-10% higher than that of Cell 4 without FS. TN removal efficiencies of Cell 1 to 3 were 3-14% higher than that of Cell 4 and 5. The average $R^2$ values of COD, SS, TN and TP obtained from nonlinear regression analysis were similar to the results of other researchers.

Keywords

References

  1. 기상청, 자동기상관측장비(AWS-549) (2006)
  2. American Public Health Association/ American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn, Washington DC, USA (1998)
  3. Brix, H., Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands: System Design, Removal Processes, Treatment Performance, In Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement, ed., G.A. Moshiri, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 9-22 (1993)
  4. Crites, R. W. and Tchobanoglous, G., Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems, McGraw-Hill, NY, pp. 563-644 (1998)
  5. Danckwerts, P. V., Continuous Flow Systems: Distribution of Residence Times, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2(1), pp. 1-13 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(53)80001-1
  6. Del Bubba, M., Arias, C. A. and Brix, H., Phosphorus Adsorption Maximum of Sands for Use as Media in Subsurface Flow Constructed Reed Beds as Measured by Langmuir Isotherm, Water Research, 37, pp. 3390-3400 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00231-8
  7. EPA, Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment and Wildlife Habitat - 17 Case Studies, EPA832-R-93-005, Office of Water, Washington, DC, pp. 203-218 (1993a)
  8. EPA, Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewater, EPA-625-R-99-010. Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 66-121 (2000)
  9. EPA, National Water Quality Inventory; 2000 Report, EPA-841- R-02-001, Office of Water, Washington DC, pp. 7-15 (2002)
  10. EPA, Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment - A Technology Assessment, Chapter 4: Design Considerations, EPA 832-R-93-008, Office of Water, Washington, DC, pp. 1-21 (1993b)
  11. Gearheart, R. A., Use of Constructed Wetlands to Treat Domestic Wastewater, City of Arcata, California, Wat. Sci. Tech., 26(7-8), pp. 1625-1637 (1992)
  12. Gersberg, R. M., Elkins, B. V. and Goldman, C. R., Nitrogen Removal in Artificial Wetlands, Water Res., 17(9), pp. 1009-1014 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(83)90041-6
  13. Hunt, P. G., Stone, K. C., Humenik, F. J., Matheny, T. A. and Johnson, M. H., In-stream Wetland Mitigation of Nitrogen Contamination in a USA Coastal Plain Stream, Journal of Environmental Quality, 28(1), pp. 249-256 (1999) https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800010030x
  14. Jing, S. R. and Lin, Y. F., Seasonal Effect on Ammonia Nitrogen Removal by Constructed Wetlands Treating Polluted River Water in Southern Taiwan, Environmental Pollution, 127(2), pp. 291-301 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00267-7
  15. Kadlec, R. H. and Hey, D. L., Constructed Wetlands for River Water Quality Improvement, Water Sci. Tech., 29(4), pp. 159-168 (1994) https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0181
  16. Kadlec, R. H. and Knight, R. L., Treatment Wetlands, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, p. 893 (1996)
  17. Knight, R. L., Payne, V. W. E. Jr., Borer, R. E., Clarke, R. A. Jr. and Pries, J. H., Constructed Wetlands for Livestock Wastewater Management, Ecological Engineering, 15(1-2), pp. 41-55 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00034-8
  18. Levenspiel, O., Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, NY, pp. 255-338 (1999)
  19. Reddy, K. R., Patrick, W. H. Jr. and Lindau, C. W., Nitrification- denitrification at the Plant Root-sediment Interface in Wetlands, Limnol Oceanogr., 34(6), pp. 1004-1013 (1989) https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1989.34.6.1004
  20. Reed, S. C., Crites, R. W. and Middlebrooks, E. J., Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, NY, pp. 173-284 (1995)
  21. Stone, K. C., Hunt, P. G., Novak, J. M. and Johnson, M. H., In-stream Wetland Design for Non-point Source Pollution Abatement, Transactions of ASAE, 19(2), pp. 171-175 (2003)
  22. Stone, K. L., Poach, M. E., Hunt, P. G. and Reddy, G. B., Marsh-pond-marsh Constructed Wetland Design Analysis for Swine Lagoon Wastewater Treatment, Ecological Engineering, 23(2), pp. 127-133 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.07.008