적합도에 따른 ITI 임플란트 지지 고정성 국소의치의 삼차원 유한요소 분석

Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on ITI Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures with Various Fitting Accuracy

  • 최민호 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 이일권 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조혜원 (원광대학교)
  • Choi, Min-Ho (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Il-Kwon (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Ree (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2006.03.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of prostheses misfit, cantilever on the stress distribution in the implant components and surrounding bone using three dimensional finite element analysis. Two standard 3-dimensional finite element models were constructed: (1) 3 ITI implant supported, 3-unit fixed partial denture and (2) 3 ITI implant supported, 3-unit fixed partial denture with a distal cantilever. variations of the standard finite element models were made by placing a $100{\mu}m$ or $200{\mu}m$ gap between the fixture, the abutment and the crown on the second premolar and first molar. Total 14 models were constructed. In each model, 244 N of vertical load and 244 N of $30^{\circ}$ oblique load were placed on the distal marginal ridge of the distal molar. von Mises stresses were recorded and compared in the crowns, abutments, crestal compact bones, and trabecular bones. The results were obtained as follows: 1. In the ITI implant system, cement-retained prostheses showed comparatively low stress distributions on all the implant components and fixtures regardless of the misfit sizes under vertical loading. The stresses were increased twice under oblique loading especially in the prostheses with cantilever, but neither showed the effects of misfit size. 2. Under the oblique loading and posterior cantilever, the stresses were highly increased in the crestal bones around ITI implants, but effects of misfit were not shown. Although higher stresses were shown on the apical portion of trabecular bones, the effects by misfit were little and the stresses were increased by the posterior cantilever. 3. When the cement loss happened in the ITI implant supported FPD with misfit, the stresses were increased in the implant componets and supporting structures.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 원광대학교

참고문헌

  1. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, at al. Long term evaluation of non submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-years life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  2. Skalak R, Zhao Y. Interaction of force-fitting and surface roughness of implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:219-224 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00120.x
  3. Jemt T, Book K. Prostheses misfit and marginal bone loss in osseointegrated implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:620-625
  4. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics. A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-178
  5. Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9: 169-178
  6. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002;11:30-40
  7. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15.66-75
  8. Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Brjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:179-183
  9. Hebel KS. Gajiar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:8-35
  10. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:466-473 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01027.x
  11. Major MS Jr. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion: 7th ed WB Saunders Co. 1993;218-31
  12. Tolman DE, Laney WR. Tissue-integrated prostheses complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:477-484
  13. Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screw joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71: 592-599 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90443-X
  14. Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthont 1995;8:511-516
  15. Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant supported fixed partial dentures. A 6-month to 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:645-649
  16. Guichet DL, Angelo A, Choi HJ, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit marginal opening in screw- or cemented-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-246
  17. Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement retained implant-supported prostheses. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-18
  18. Kim WD, Jacobson Z, Nathanson D. In vitro stress analysis dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses. Implant Dent 1999;8:141-151 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199908020-00006
  19. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:545-549
  20. Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-665
  21. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Ross T, Mark M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-348 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x
  22. Rangert B, Sullivan R. Biomechanical principles presenting prosthetic overload induced by bending. Novel-pharma News 1993;7(3):4-5
  23. Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 9th ed., Philadelphia. WB Saunders, 1991, p 15