Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회지)

Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회)
권호 표지

Development of Konan Saprobic Index using Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Its Application to Biological Stream Environment Assessment

저서성 대형무척추동물을 이용한 한국오수생물지수의 개발과 생물학적 하천환경평가 적용

  • Won, Doo Hee (Doohee Institute of Ecological Research (DIER), Korea Ecosystem Service (KES) Inc.) ;
  • Jun, Yung Chul (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kwon, Sun Jik (Doohee Institute of Ecological Research (DIER), Korea Ecosystem Service (KES) Inc.) ;
  • Hwang, Soon Jin (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Ahn, Kwang Guk (School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae Kwan (Environmental Diagnostics Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER))
  • 원두희 ((주)생태조사단 부설 두희자연환경연구소) ;
  • 전영철 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 권순직 ((주)생태조사단 부설 두희자연환경연구소) ;
  • 황순진 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 안광국 (충남대학교 생명과학부) ;
  • 이재관 (국립환경과학원 환경진단연구부)
  • Received : 2006.06.26
  • Accepted : 2006.08.16
  • Published : 2006.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Biological stream environment assessment has been an essential trend of aquatic ecosystems among advanced countries, because the chemical water quality assessment has limitations that only represent temporal water environmental status. Benthic macroinvertebrates are the most popular bioindicator group useful to biological water quality assessment for a long time. In addition, a number of indices using benthic macroinvertebrates have recently been developed not only for water quality assessment but also for ecological health assessment. In this paper Korean Saprobic Index (KSI) based on Zelinka-Marvan's saprobic valency concept is developed by applying DIN 38410 in Germany. The KSI value was widely applicable to most Korean streams with the exception of sand-based large streams, for example main stream of Nakdong River. But as a result of non-linear regression analysis the correlation between KSI and $BOD_5$ concentration was high and KSI reflected water quality alteration for mid and long-term period. In spite of applicability of KSI, it should be supplemented and developed to make it strong by accumulating field data as well as to manage integrated water environment in general through continuous biomonitoring.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구

Supported by : 국립환경과학원

References

  1. 공동수, 류흥일, 류재근, 윤일병, 저서성 대형무척추동물 상위분류군 생물지수의 고안 및 적용, 한국환경독성학회 추계학술대화 요약집, pp. 1-11 (1995)
  2. 윤일병, 공동수, 류재근, 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구( I ) - 오탁계급치 및 생물가중치 산정을 중심으로, 한국환경생물학회지, 10, pp. 24-39 (1992a)
  3. 윤일병, 공동수, 류재근, 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구(III) - 육안적 간략수질 평가방법을 중심으로, 한국환경생물학회지, 10, pp. 77-84 (1992b)
  4. AQEM Project Website, http://www.aqem.de (accessed Jul 2006)
  5. Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J. F. and Furse, M. T., The Performance of a New Biological Water Quality Score System based on Macroinvertebrates over a Wide Range of Unpolluted Running-water Sites, Water Res., 17(3), pp. 333-347 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(83)90188-4
  6. Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D. and Stribling, J. B., Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., USA (1999)
  7. Beck, W. M., Jr., Suggested Method for Reporting Biotic Data, Sewage Industr. Wastes, 27, pp. 1-1193 (1955)
  8. Buck, H., Die Kopplungsanalyse, ein Rationelles Okologisches Verfahren zur Gutebewertung von Flie${\ss}$gewassern, Interner Kurzbericht Landesstelle fur Gewasserkunde und Wasser- wirtschaftliche Planung Baden-Wiirttemberg, pp. 1-10 (1974)
  9. Canale, G., BORIS - Benthic evaluation of ORegon rIverS, Draft report, Department of Environmental Quality Laboratory, Biomonitoring Section, Portland, Oregon, (1999)
  10. Chandler, J. R., A Biological Approach to Water Quality Management, Water Poll. Control, 69, pp. 415-422 (1970)
  11. Chutter, F. M., An Empirical Biotic Index of the Quality of Water in South African Streams and Rivers, Water Resource, 6, pp. 19-30 (1972)
  12. DeShon, J. E., Development and Application of the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI), pp. 217-243 in Davis, W. S. and Simon T. P. (eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida (1995)
  13. DIN 38410, Part 2, Biological-ecological Analysis of water (group M); determination of the saprobic index(M2), German Standard Methods for the Examination of Water, Waste Water and Sludge, p. 10 (1990)
  14. Friedrich, G., Eine Revision des Saprobiensystems, Z. Wasser-Abwasser-Forsch., 23, pp. 141-152 (1990)
  15. Gose, K., Trial to Application of Saprobic Value and Indicator Value on Macroscopic Animals by Zelinka-Marvan, Jap. J. Water Treat. BioI., 14, pp. 9-17 (1978) https://doi.org/10.2521/jswtb.14.9
  16. Hellawell, J. M., Biological Surveillance of Rivers, Water Research Center, Stevenage, England, p. 322 (1978)
  17. Hilsenhoff, W. L., An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution, Great Lakes Entomologist, 20, pp. 31-39 (1987)
  18. Hilsenhoff, W. L., Rapid Field Assessment of Organic Pollution with a Family-level Biotic Index, Journal of North American Benthological Society, 7, pp. 65-68 (1988) https://doi.org/10.2307/1467832
  19. Hilsenhoff, W. L., Use of Arthropods to Evaluate Water Quality of Streams, Technical Bulletin No. 100, Department of National Resource, Madison Wisconsin. p. 15 (1977)
  20. Knopp, H., Ein Neuer Weg zur Darstellung Biologischer Vortluteruntersuchungen. Erlautert an einem Gutelangs Schnitt des Maines, Wasserwirtschaft. 45, pp. 9-15 (1954)
  21. Lang, C. and Reymond, O., An Improved Index of Environmental Quality for Swiss Rivers based on Benthic Invertebrates. Aquatic Sciences, 57(2), pp. 172-180 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877385
  22. Lang, C., L'Eplatlenier, G.. and Reymond, O., Water Quality in Rivers of Western Switzerland: Application of an Adaptable Index based on Benthic Invertebrates, Aquatic Sciences, 51(3), pp. 224-234 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877744
  23. Metcafe-Smith, J. L., Biological Water Quality Assessment of Rivers: Use of Macroinvertebrate Communities, pp. 17-43 in Petts, G., and Calow, P. (eds.), River Restoration, Backwell Science, p. 231 (1996)
  24. Norris, R. H., Biological Monitoring: The Dilemma of Data Analysis, Journal of North American Benthological Society, 14, pp. 440-450 (1995) https://doi.org/10.2307/1467210
  25. ONORM M6232, Richtlinien fur die Okologische Untersuchung und Bewertung von Flie${\ss}$gewassern, Osterr. Normungsinstitut, Wien (1995)
  26. Pantle, R. and Buck, H., Die Biologische Uberwachung der Gewasser und die Daistellung der Ergebnisse, Gas und Wasserfach, 96, p. 604 (1955)
  27. Platkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K. D., Gross, S. K. and Hughes, R. M., Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and Fish, EPA 440-4-89-001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, D.C. (1989)
  28. Sladecek, V., The Future of the Saprobity System, Hydrobiologia, 25, pp. 518-533 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838511
  29. Stark, J. D., Performance of the Macroinvertebrate Community Index: Effects of Sampling Method, Sample Replication, Water Depth, Current Velocity, and Substratum on Index Values, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 27, pp. 463-478 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1993.9516588
  30. Tolkamp, H. and Gardeniers, J., Hydrobiological Survey of Lowland Streams in the Achterhoek (The Netherlands) by Means of a System for the Assessment of Water Quality and Stream Character based on Macroinvertebrates, Mit. Inst. f Wasserwirt. d. TH Hannover, 41, pp. 215-237 (1977)
  31. Tsuda, M., Biology of Polluted Waters, Hokuryu-kan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, p. 258 (1964)
  32. Woodiwiss, F. S., Comparative Study of Biological-Ecological Water Quality Assessment Methods, Summary Report. Commission of the European Communities. Severn Trent Water Authority. UK, p. 45 (1978)
  33. Woodiwiss, F. S., The Biological System of Stream Classification used by the Trent River Board. Chemy. indust, 11, pp. 443-447 (1964)
  34. Wright, J. F., Furse, M. T., and Armitage, P. D., RIVPACS: A Technique for Evaluating the Biological Quality of Rivers in the UK. European Water Pollution Control, 3(4), pp. 15-25 (1993)
  35. Zelinka, M. and Marvan, P., Zur Prazisierung der Biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheid Fliessender Gewasser, Arch. Hydrobiolog, 57, pp. 389-407 (1961)