수직적 안모유헝에 따른 치료 후 교합평면 안정성에 관한 연구

Post-treatment stability of the occlusal plane according to different vertical facial patterns

  • 박정은 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 이진우 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 정동화 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 차경석 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Park, Jung-Eun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Chung, Dong-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cha, Kyung-Suk (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.30

초록

본 연구는 수직적 안모유형에 따른 치료 후 교합평면 변화양상을 조사하여 향후 적절한 치료계획과 기전의 설정에 도움이 되고자 시행하였다. 골격성 I급 부정교합으로 진단되어 비발치로 치료받은 성민 60명(남자 28명, 여자 32명)을 대상으로 하였으며, Ricketts법의 facial axis, facial depth, mandibular plane angle, lower face height, mandibular arc의 5개 항목을 이용하여 한국 성인의 정상교합자 통계치의 기준에 따라 short face type (1군), average face type (2군), long face type (3군)으로 분류하였다. 각 군의 치료 전, 치료 종료, 종료 후 1년의 측모두부 방사선사진 계측치를 비교 분석하였다. 1군은 치료 종료 시와 비교하여 유지기간에 일반적 교합평면각, 기능적 교합 평면각, L6/L1, MP-L6 항목이 유의하게 감소하였고(p < 0.01) L1-FOP 항목은 유의하게 증가하였다(p < 0.001). 2군은 유지기간에 유의한 변화를 보이지 않았으며 3군은 유지기간에 기능적 교합평면각이 유의하게 증가하였다(p < 0.05). 기능적 교합평면각의 치료 후 변화량은 각 군 간에 유의한 차이를 보였으며 특히, 1군과 3군 간에 매우 큰 유의성을 보였다. 따라서 치아의 압하, 정출 및 치료 후 전치부 피개 등에 있어 유지기간 중 교합평면각 변화의 고려가 필요하다고 생각된다.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to find changes in the occlusal plane related to different vertical facial patterns and suggest treatment goals and conduct possible treatment mechanisms. Methods: 60 adult patients (28 males, 32 females) who had been diagnosed as Class 1 skeletal malocclusion and treated without extraction were selected. Patients were divided into three groups; short face type (group 1), average face type (group 2) and long face type (group 3), using the data on normal occlusion of Korean adults. Results: The results were achieved by analyzing cephalometric tracings of each group at pre-treatment, end-treatment and post-treatment (about 1 year recall check). The inclination of the occlusion plane tends to gradually increase as the face becomes longer In group 1, COP-X, FOP-X, L6/L1, MP-L6 were significantly decreased, and L1-FOP was significantly increased during the retention period (T3-T2). Group 2 showed no significant change, In group 3, FOP-X was significantly increased during the retention period (T3-T2). During the retention period, FOP-X showed significant change among each group, especially between group 1 and group 3. Conclusion: These results suggest that changes of occlusal plane inclination according to facial vertical pattern need to be considered during the retention period for intrusion, extrusion, and incisor overbite.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray teehnique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66
  2. Kang SH, Nahm DS, Roentgenoeephalometric study on facial height and occlusal plane inclination in class I malocclusion group. Korean J Orthod 1995;25:111-28
  3. Kim YW, Sohn BH. A eephalometrie study of dentofaeial morphology in relation with facial growth pattern. Korean J Orthod 1985;15:239-47
  4. Kim HS, Nahm DS, A roentgenocephalometric study on maxillofacial morpholgy. Korean J Orthod 1983;13:45-61
  5. Braun S, Legan HL. Changes in occlusion related to the cant of the occlusal plane. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:184-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70214-2
  6. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationship; their significance in treatment & prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3
  7. Janson GR, Metaxas A, woodside DG. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:409-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70063-X
  8. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984;86:449-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X
  9. Enlow DH. A morphogenetic analysis of faeial growth. Am J Orthod 1966;52:283-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(66)90169-2
  10. Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. Intrinsie craniofacial compensations. Angle Orthod 1971;41:271-85
  11. Harvold EP, Chierici G, Vargervik K. Experiments on the development of dental malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1972;61:38-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90174-1
  12. Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. In: 8th ed: St. Louis-Toronto-London: C.V. Mosby; 1980. p.296-9
  13. Schudy FF. Cant of occlusal plane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 1963;33:69-82
  14. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964;34:75-93
  15. Schudy FF. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth. Its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1965;35:36-50
  16. Schudy FF. The control of vertieal overbite in clinical orthodonties. Angle Orthod 1968;38:19-39
  17. Di Paolo RJ. An individualized approach to locating the occlusal plane. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:41-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90294-0
  18. Hamm SM, Sohn BH, Roentgenocephalometric study of craniofacial growth by Ricketts analysis on teen-ager with normal occlusion in Korean. Korean J Orthod 1985;15:313-25
  19. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1948
  20. Brodie AG. On the growth pattern of the human head, from the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat 1941;68:209-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000680204
  21. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth cephalometric standards from University school growth study, Monograph 2, Craniofacial growth series, Ann Arbor: Center of Human Growth and Develpment; Univ. of Michigan; 1974. p. 14-20
  22. Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969;55:585-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0
  23. Bjork A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:339-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90277-1
  24. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structure to cranium in maloc elusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22:142-5
  25. Bushra E. Variations in the human facial pattern in normal lateralis. Angle Orthod 1948;18:100-2
  26. Sassouni V, Nanda SK. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 1964;50:801-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90039-9
  27. Lee SY, Chang YI, A study on the occlusal plane inclination in lateral ccphalograph. Korean J Orthod 1991;21:367-97
  28. Hyun SW. Individualized reconstruction of the lower occlusal plane according to skeletal pattern. Korean J Orthod 1995;25:465-85
  29. Nahm DS, Jeong MH, Roentgenocephalometric study on facial heig ht and occlusal plane inclination in class II malocclusion group. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:255-68
  30. McDowell CS. Static anchorage in the Begg technique. Angle Orthod 1969;39: 162-70
  31. Thompson JR. The rest position of the mandible and its application to analysis and correction of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1949;19:162-87
  32. Subtelny JD. Malocclusions, orthodontic corrections and orofacial muscle adaptation. Angle Orthod 1970;3:170-201