DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Cognitive Task on Stride Rate Variability by Walking Speeds

보행속도변화에 따른 인지 과제 수행이 보행수 변동성에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Jin-Seung (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University) ;
  • Yoo, Ji-Hye (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Shik (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University) ;
  • Chung, Soon-Cheol (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University) ;
  • Yi, Jeong-Han (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Bong-Soo (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University) ;
  • Tack, Gye-Rae (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University)
  • 최진승 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부) ;
  • 유지혜 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부) ;
  • 김형식 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부) ;
  • 정순철 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부) ;
  • 이정한 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부) ;
  • 이봉수 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부) ;
  • 탁계래 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 의학공학부)
  • Published : 2006.12.12

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of performing a cognitive task during treadmill walking on the stride rate variability. Ten university students(age $24.0{\pm}0.25$, height $172{\pm}3.1cm$, weight $66{\pm}5.3kg$) were participated in dual task experiments which consist of both walking alone and walking with a cognitive task. Two-back task was selected for the cognitive task since it did not have learning effect during the experimental procedure.3D motion analysis system was used to measure subject's position data by changing walking speed with 4.8, 5.6, 6.4, 6.8, and 7.2 km/hr. Stride rate was calculated by the time between heel contact and heel contact. Accuracy rate of a cognitive task during walking, coefficient of variance, allometric scaling methods and Fano factor were used to estimated the stride rate variability. As the walking speed increased, accuracy rate decreased and the logarithmic value of Fano factor increased which showed the statistical difference. Thus it can be concluded that the gait control mechanism is distracted by the secondary attention focus which is the cognitive task ie. two-back task. Further study is needed to clarify this by increasing the number of subject and experiment time.

Keywords

References

  1. W. P. Morgan, 'Psychophysiology of self-awareness during vigorous physical activity,' Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), vol. 52, no. 3, pp.385-427, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1981.10607886
  2. R. A. Margill, Motor Learning and Control ;concept and Applications, McGraw-Hill Company, Inc., 2003, pp. 140-165
  3. K. A. Faulkner, M. S. Redfern, C. Rosano, D. P. Landsittel, S. A. Studenski, J. A. Cauley, J. M. Zmuda, E. M. Simonsick, S. B. Kritchevsky, A. B. Newman, 'Reciprocal influence of concurrent walking and cognitive testing on performance in older adults,' Gait & Posture, vol. 24, no. 2, pp.182-189, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.08.004
  4. C. G. Canning, L. Ada and S. S. Paul, 'Is automaticity of walking regained after stroke?' Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 2, pp.97-102, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500167712
  5. S. O'Shea, M. E. Morris, R. Iansek, 'Dual task interference during gait in people with parkinson disease :Effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks,' Physical Therapy, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 888-897,2002
  6. G. Yogev, N. Giladi, C. Peretz, S. Springer, E. S. Simon and J. M. Hausdorff, 'Dual tasking gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson's disease: Which aspects of gait are attention demanding?' European J. of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 5, pp.1248-1256, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04298.x
  7. G. L. Daniels, K. M. Newell, 'Attention focus influences the walk-run transition in human locomotion,' Biological Psychology, vol. 63,no.2,pp. 163-178,2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00024-3
  8. B. Abernethy, A. Hanna, A. Plooy, 'The attentional demands of preferred and non-preferred gait patterns,' Gait & Posture, vol. 15, no. 3, pp.256-265, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00195-3
  9. B. J. West, L. A. Griffin, Biodynamics: Why the wirewalker doesn't Fall, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004
  10. J. M. Hausdorff, 'Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning,' J. of Neuro Engineering & Rehabilitation, vol. 2, no. 19,2005
  11. R.P. Wells,D.A. Winter, 'Assessment of signal and noise in the kinematics of normal, pathological and sporting gaits,' in Proc. the Special Conference of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics (CSB), Human Locomotion I, 1980, pp.92-93
  12. A. Hreljac, R. N. Marshall, 'Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data,' J. of Biomechanics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp, 783-786, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00014-2
  13. T. M. Owings, M. D. Grabiner, 'Measuring step kinematic variability on an instrumented treadmill : how many steps are enough?' J. of Biomechanics, vol 36, no. 8, pp.1215-1218, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00108-8
  14. J. P. Regnaux, J. Robertson, D. Ben Smail, O. Daniel, B.Bussel, 'Human treadmill walking needs attention,' J. of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol 3, no 1, pp.19, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-19
  15. F. Alton, L. Baldey, S. Caplan, M. C. Morrissey, 'A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking,' Clinical Biomechanics, vol 13, no 6, pp.434, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00012-6
  16. B. J. West, L. Griffin, 'Allometric control, Inverse power laws and Human gait,' Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1519-1527, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(98)00149-0