Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Following Postural Reduction in Unstable Vertebra Plana; Is it a Contraindication?

  • Kim, Seok-Won (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Meung (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Shin, Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Sung (Department of Neurosurgery, Mok-po Hankook Hospital)
  • Published : 2006.02.28

Abstract

Objective : Severe vertebral body collapse [vertebra plana] is considered a contraindication to vertebroplasty by most authors. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of vertebroplasty in treating severe compression fracture patients with osteoporosis. Methods : 16 patients underwent 18 vertebroplasties following postural reduction for vertebra plana. The fractures were defined vertebrae that have collapsed to more than 75% of their original height. Imaging and clinical features were analyzed, including involved vertebrae level, vertebral height after postural reduction for 2 days, injected cement volume, clinical outcome and complications. Results : Involved veretebra were located from level T7 to L4. Vertebral body collapse averaged 79% [range $12{\sim}25%$] of the original height. After pillow reduction for 2 days, vertebral body height increased 35% of the original height [range $15{\sim}45%$]. The kyphotic wedge was $12^{\circ}$ before procedure and was decreased $7.0^{\circ}$ after vertebroplasty. The mean injected cement volume was 3.8ml [range $2.0{\sim}4.9ml$]. After the procedure, surgical outcome was excellent in 8 [50%] of 16 patients, good in 7 [42%] and unchanged in one [8%]. The mean pain score [VAS score] prior to vertebroplasty was 8.3 and it changed 3.2 after the procure. Cement leakage to the adjacent disc [5 cases] and paravertebral soft tissues [4 cases] developed but there were no major complications. Conclusion : We propose that vertebra plana due to osteoporosis is not a contraindication to vertebroplasty. Vertebroplasty following postural reduction for severe compression fracture is safe and effective treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Amar AP, Larsen DW, Esnaashari N, Albuquerque FC, Lavine SD, Teitelbaum GP : Percutaneous transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal compression fractures. Neurosurgery 49 : 1105-1114, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200111000-00017
  2. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, Mccamm RM : Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25 : 923-928, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200004150-00005
  3. Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B, Assaker R, Demondion X, Leblond D, et al : Percutaneous vertebroplasty : state of the art. Radiographics 18 : 311- 320, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.18.2.9536480
  4. Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Assaker R, Leblond D, Duquesnoy B, et al : Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma : effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200 : 525-530, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685351
  5. Deramond H, Derpriester C, Galibert P, Le Gars D : Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate : technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 36 : 533-546, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70042-7
  6. O'Brien JP, Sims JT, Evans AJ : Vertebroplasty in patients with severe vertebral compression fractures; a technical report. AJNR 21 : 1555-1558, 2000
  7. Park JW, Kong MH, Lee SK, Song KY, Kang DS : Improved quality of life after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral body in the elderly. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 34 : 560-564, 2003
  8. Peh WC, Gilula LA, Peck DD : Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Radiology 223 : 121- 126, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010234
  9. Perters KR, Guiot BH, Martin PA, Fessler RG : Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures : current practice and evolving techniques. Neurosurgery 51 : 96-103, 2002
  10. Stallmeyer MJ, Zoarski GH, Obuchowski AM : Optimizing patient selection in percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 : 683-696, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000064859.87207.FA
  11. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, Rose M, Solamartinez T, Enkaoua E : Spinal metastases : indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 199 : 241-247, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633152
  12. Boszczyk BM, Bierschneider M, Schmid K, Grillhosl A, Robert B, Jaksche H : Microsurgical interlaminary vertebro and kyphoplasty for severe osteoporotic fractures. J Neurosurg 100 : 32-37, 2004
  13. Hentschel SJ, Rhines LD, Shah HN, Burton AW, Mendel F : Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebra plana secondary to metastasis. J Spinal Disord Tech 17 : 554-557, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000112042.70321.53
  14. Peh WC, Gilula LA, Peck DD : Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Radiology 223 : 121- 126, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010234