DRIVER BEHAVIOR WITH ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL

  • Cho, J.H. (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Nam, H.K. (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, W.S. (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University)
  • 발행 : 2006.08.01

초록

As an important and relatively easy to implement technology for realizing Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS), Adaptive Cruise Control(ACC) automatically adjusts vehicle speed and distance to a preceding vehicle, thus enhancing driver comfort and safety. One of the key issues associated with ACC development is usability and user acceptance. Control parameters in ACC should be optimized in such a way that the system does not conflict with driving behavior of the driver and further that the driver feels comfortable with ACC. A driving simulator is a comprehensive research tool that can be applied to various human factor studies and vehicle system development in a safe and controlled environment. This study investigated driving behavior with ACC for drivers with different driving styles using the driving simulator. The ACC simulation system was implemented on the simulator and its performance was evaluated first. The Driving Style Questionnaire(DSQ) was used to classify the driving styles of the drivers in the simulator experiment. The experiment results show that, when driving with ACC, preferred headway-time was 1.5 seconds regardless of the driving styles, implying consistency in driving speed and safe distance. However, the lane keeping ability reduced, showing the larger deviation in vehicle lateral position and larger head and eye movement. It is suggested that integration of ACC and lateral control can enhance driver safety and comfort even further.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Higashimata, A., Adachi, K., Hashizume, T. and Tange, S. (2001). Design of a headway distance control system for ACC. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan Review, 22, 15-22
  2. Hoedemaeker, M. and Brookhuis, K. A. (1998). Behavioral Adaptation to Driving with an Adaptive Cruise Control. Transportation Research Part F 1. 95-106. Amsterdam. Netherlands
  3. Kim, H. D. (2002). Development of an Adaptive Cruise Control Simulation System using a Driving Simulator. M.S. Thesis. Kookmin University. Seoul, Korea
  4. Kim, J. S., Lee, Y. S., Kim, Y. S., Lee, W. S., Bag, J. C. and Park, J. C. (2004). A study on driver response to unexpected situations. Proc. Human-Computer Interaction Conf., 28-33 (in Korean)
  5. Lee, W. S. and Cho, J. H. (2001). Development of a fullscale driving simulator for traffic accident reconstruction and analysis. Int. Conf. Automotive Engineering, 198-202
  6. Lee, W. S., Jung, S. K., Cho, J. H., Shin, S. I. and Bag, J. C. (2001). A sudden acceleration study using the Kookmin University driving simulator. Proc. Human- Centered Transportation Simulation Conf., Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 1-7
  7. OKTAL. (2001). A SCANeR II User's Manual. Paris, France
  8. SeeingMachines. (2002). A FaceLAB v2.0 User Manual. Canberra, Australia
  9. Stanton, N. A., Young, M. and McCaulder, B. (1997). Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science 27, 2/3, 149-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00054-4
  10. West, R., Elander, J. and French, D. (1992). Decision Making, Personality and Driving Style as Correlates of Individual Accident Risk. Contractor Report, 309, Transport Research Laboratory. Berkshire, England
  11. Weinberger, M., Winner, H. and Bubb, H. (2001). Adaptive cruise control field operational test - the learning phase. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan Review, 22, 487-494