DESIGN EVALUATION OF NO SPIN DIFFERENTIAL MODELS USING THE AXIOMATIC APPROACH

  • Pyun, Y.S. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sun Moon University) ;
  • Jang, Y.D. (Department of Mechanical Design, Korea Polytechnic College II) ;
  • Cho, I.H. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Sun Moon University) ;
  • Park, J.H. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sun Moon University) ;
  • Combs, A. (Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Sun Moon University) ;
  • Lee, Y.C. (Jinheung Machinary Co.)
  • Published : 2006.08.01

Abstract

Two No Spin Differential(NSD) models were benchmarked for a project of Dual-Use Technology. The Axiomatic approach is utilized to evaluate the designs of the models. The Independence Axiom is satisfied at the top level of design but not at the second level, which implies the design exhibits coupling and will admit design improvements. The detailed process of design evaluation is described. It is shown that it is possible to develop a unique and evolutionary NSD design by solving the problems that cause coupling within two models.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, S. and Moon, Y. (2000). New vibration isolator made axiomatic approach. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design, 1-8
  2. Do, S. (1997). Application of Design Axioms to the Design of Manufacturability for Television Glass Bulb. Ph. D. Dissertation. Hanyang University. Korea
  3. Dual Use Technology Center (1995). http://www dutc.re.kr/
  4. Fery, D., Jahangir, E. and Engelhardt, F. (2000). Computing the information content of decoupled designs. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design, 151-160
  5. Houshmand, M. and Jamshidnezhad, B. (2002). Conceptual design of lean production systems through an axiomatic approach. 2nd Conf. Axiomatic Design, 1-12
  6. Hu, M., Yang, K. and Taguchi, S. (2000). Enhancing robust design with the aid of TRIZ and axiomatic design. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design, 1-9
  7. Kang, Y., Hwang, Y., Cha, S. and Moon, Y. (2001). The development of tool for evaluating quantitative independency between FRS in axiomatic design. J. KSPE 18, 3, 122-130
  8. Kim, Y., Cho, K., Moon, Y. and Cha, S. (2001). Evolution methodology development of disassembly through axiomatic design. J. KSPE 18, 4, 197-202
  9. Lee, K. and Park, G. (2000). A structural optimization methodology using the independence axiom. J. KSME 24, 10, 2348-2450
  10. Lee, K., Yi, J., Lee, K. and Park, G. (2000). A structural optimization methodology using the independence axiom. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design, 145-150
  11. Lee, Y. (2002). NSD Annual Project Report. Dual Use Technology Center. 383-388
  12. Liu, X. and Soderborg, N. (2000). Improving an existing design based on axiomatic design principles. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design, 199-202
  13. Lossack, R. and Grabowski, H. (2000). The axiomatic approach in universal design theory. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design, 1-8
  14. Moon, Y., Cha, S. and Kim, Y. (1999a). Axiomatic approach for design appraisement and development DVD (I). J. KSPE 16, 5, 124-131
  15. Moon, Y., Cha, S. and Kim, Y. (1999b). Axiomatic approach for design appraisement and development DVD (II). J. KSPE 16, 9, 82-88
  16. Moon, Y., Cha, S. and Yoon, P. (1999c). Weight reduction in automobile design through axiomatic approach. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 7, 6, 106-109
  17. Pyun, Y., Jang, Y., Lee, Y., Park, J. and Yea, J. (2003). A study on the development of no spin differential for an off-road vehicle. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 11, 6, 127-133
  18. Sozo, V., Forcelline, F. and Ogliari, A. (2001). Axiomatic approach application during the product conceptual design phase. Int. Conf. Mechanica, 267-272
  19. Suh, N. (1995). Design and operation of large systems. J. Manufacturing Systems 14, 3, 203-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6125(95)98887-C
  20. Suh, N. (1999). The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York. 64-72
  21. Suh, N. (2001). Axiomatic Design. Oxford University Press, New York. 239-297