Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지

Predictive Value of Sensory Nerve Conduction in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

  • Published : 2006.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Electrodiagnostic test has shown diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in carpal tunnel syndrome[CTS]. This study was to evaluate the correlation between clinical outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel ligament release[ECTR] and the predictive value of sensory nerve conduction. Methods : From January 1998 to December 2004, 87 patients [44 right hand, 37 left hand, 6 bilateral hands] with CTS who underwent ECTR were followed up in our hospital for an average of 24 months. We retrospectively analyzed the results with previous medical records. All patients underwent electrodiagnostic test and ECTR. The patients were divided into three groups according to the electrodiagnostic test results. Group [A] was normal sensory nerve response, Group [B] was slowing sensory response and Group [C] was no sensory response. Improvement of the symptom after ECTR was assessed using a visual analogue scale[VAS] score. Results : Differences between the three groups on the correlation of severity of sensory potential and duration of preoperative symptoms were significant. The mean value of improved VAS scores for the three groups were $6.0{\pm}0.96$ in the Group A, $6.11{\pm}0.48$ in the Group B and $6.14{\pm}0.53$ in the Group C. There was no statistically significant difference between the severity of sensory nerve response and improvement in VAS score after ECTR. Complications included a wound infection, a case of skin necrosis, and two patients with persistent symptoms without any improvement. Conclusion : Although electrodiagnostic test has been known to be useful, sensory nerve response is considered not to be a good prognostic value for carpal tunnel syndrome after ECTR.

Keywords

References

  1. Braun RM, Jackson WJ : Electrical studies as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 19A : 893- 900, 1994
  2. Denys EH : The influence of temperature in clinical neurophysiology. Muscle Nerve 14 : 795-811, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880140902
  3. Finsen V, Russwurm H : Neurophysiology not requried before surgery for typical carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 26B : 61-64, 2001
  4. Giannini F, Cioni R, Mondelli M : A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome : validation of the measurement and clinical neurophysiological assessment. Clin Neruophysiol 113 : 71-77, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00704-0
  5. Glowacki KA, Breen CJ, Sachar K, Weiss AP : Electrodiagnostic testing and carpal tunnel release outcome. J Hand Surg 21A : 117-122, 1996
  6. Graham RA : Carpal tunnel syndrome : a statistical analysis of 214 cases. Orthopaedics 66 : 1283-1289, 1983
  7. Grundberg AB : Carpal tunnel decompression in spite of normal electromyography. J Hand Surg 8 : 348-349, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80179-8
  8. Kuntzer T : Carpal tunnel syndrome in 100 patients : senstivity, specificity of multi-neurophysiological procedures and estimation of axonal loss of motor, sensory and sympathetic median nerve fibers. J Neurol Sci 127 : 221-229, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(94)90076-0
  9. Lee JM, Jeon JY, Ryu GH, Sim YJ, Choi J : The correlation of electrodiagnostic severity, severity of symptom, functional stauts, and clinical severity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Korea Acad Rehabil Med 27 : 906-910, 2003
  10. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ : A self administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 75A : 1585-1592, 1993
  11. Murphy RX, Jennings JF, Wukich DK : Major neurovascular complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 19A : 114-118, 1994
  12. Nathan PA, Meadows KD, Doyle LS : Relationship to age and sex to sensory conduction of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel and association of slowed conduction with symptoms. Muscle Nerve 11 : 1149-1153, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880111107
  13. Nielsen L, Grefersen H, Toft E, Bjerring P : Involvement of thin afferents in carpal tunnel syndrome : evaluated quantitatively by argon laser stimulation. Muscle Nerve 12 : 508-514, 1991
  14. Nishimura A, Ogura T, Hase H : A correlative electropohysiologic study of nerve fiber involvement in carpal tunnel syndrome using current perception thresholds. Clin Neurophysiol 115 : 1921-1924, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.022
  15. Ogura T, Akiyo N, Kubo T, Kira Y, Aramaki S, Nakanishi F : The relationship between nerve conduction study and clinical grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ortho Surg 11 : 190-193, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900301100215
  16. Omer GE : Median nerve compression at the wrist. Hand Clin 8 : 317- 324, 1992
  17. Park YS, Lee JC, Lee SM : Carpal tunnel syndrome : diagnostic application of MRI and sonography. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 28 : 1738-1745, 1999
  18. Pauda L, Aulisa L, Tamburreli F, Romanini E, Lo Monaco M : Carpal tunnel syndrome : indication for surgical treatment based on electrophysiologic study. J Hand Surg 23A : 678-691, 1998
  19. Rydevic B, Lundborg G, Bagge U : Effects of graded compression on intraneural blood flow. An in vivo study on rabbit tibial nerve. J Hand Surg 6 : 3-12, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(81)80003-2
  20. Stevens JC : The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 20 : 1477-1486, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199712)20:12<1477::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-5
  21. Sunderland S : The nerve lesion of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 39 : 615-626, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.39.7.615
  22. Vogt T, Mika A, Thomke F, Hopf HC : Evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with polyneurpathy. Muscle Nerve 20 : 153- 157, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199702)20:2<153::AID-MUS3>3.0.CO;2-B
  23. White JC, Hansen SR, Johnson RK : A comparison of EMG procedure in the carpal tunnel syndrome with clinical-EMG correlation. Muscle Nerve 11 : 1177-1182, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880111112