The comparative study with administrative and clinical standard of conservative treatment on herniated intervertebral lumbar disc patients

요추 추간판 탈출증 환자에 대한 보존적 치료의 행정기준과 임상기준에 관한 비교 연구

The purpose of this study is comparative with administrative and clinical standard of conservative treatment on herniated intervertebral lumbar disc patients. The persons who diagnosed to herniated intervertebral lumbar disc were attended in this study. The number of cases were 120 cases. We evaluated their chart, X-ray and MRI. The result of the group 1 study(60 cases) were as follows; 1. The patients who treated for 41days were improved 100%, which was 3cases(5%). 2. The patients who treated for 45days were improved 90%, which was 13cases(22%). 3. The patients who treated for 43days were improved 80%, which was 28cases(47%). 4. The patients who treated for 39days were improved 70%, which was 6cases(10%). 5. The patients who treated for 28days were improved 60%, which was 5cases(28%). 6. The patients who treated for 22days were improved 50%, which was 4cases(7%). 7. The patient who treated for 28days were improved 40%, which was 1case(2%). The result of the group 2 study(60 cases) were as follows; 1. The patients who treated by administrative standard were improved 40%, which was 8cases(13%). 2. The patients who treated by administrative standard wereimproved 30%, which was 32cases(53%). 3. The patients who treated by administrative standard wereimproved 20%, which was 7cases(12%). 4. The patients who treated by administrative standard were improved 10%, which was 9cases(15%). 5. The patients who treated by administrative standard wereimproved 0%, which was 4cases(7%). Conclusion ; In herniated intervertebral lumbar disc patients who had conservative treatment. The highest improve patients were 28 cases(47%), who treated for 43 days in group 1. The lowest improve patient were 4 case(7%), who treated by administrative standard in group 2. The Effective duration of conservative treatment was more than 43 days in group 1. Group 1 which applied to clincal standard was much batter than group 2 which applied to administrative standard.