산림유역 특성에 의한 붕괴 위험지역의 평가 및 예지

Evaluation and Prediction of Failure Hazard Area by the Characteristics of Forest Watershed

  • 정원옥 (국립공원관리공단 국립공원연구원) ;
  • 마호섭 (경상대학교 농과대학 산림과학부)
  • 발행 : 2006.12.30

초록

산림유역 조건에 따른 붕괴 토사량을 측정하여 사면 붕괴가능성을 평가하고 붕괴위험 지역에 대한 예지기술(豫知技術)을 개발함으로서 산지사면에서 발생하는 각종 재해에 대한 피해를 최소화 할 수 있는 산림유역 관리에 대한 기술적 기초 자료를 제공하고자 연구하였다. 붕괴 위험지역을 평가한 결과 I급지(매우 위험지역)는 화성암지 역으로 침엽수림이며 임령은 20년생 이하, 토심은 30cm 이하, 토성은 사질식양토(SCL), 석력함량은 $31{\sim}40%$, 사면방위는 남${\sim}$$(S{\sim}E)$사면, 주하천길이는 $2,501{\sim}3,500m$, 총하천수는$26{\sim}30$개, 총하천길이는$5,501{\sim}10,000m$, 하천차수는 3차수, 일차하천수는 $11{\sim}15$개 또는 16개 이상, 사면경사는 $31^{\circ}$이상의 지역으로 평가되었고, II급지(위험지역)는 변성암지역으로 활엽수림이며 임령은 $21{\sim}24$년생, 토심은$31{\sim}40cm$, 토성은 미사질식양토(SiCL) 또는 사질식양토(SCL), 석력함량은 $11{\sim}20%$, 사면방위는 남${\sim}$$(S{\sim}W)$사면, 주하천길이는 $1,501{\sim}2,500m$, 총하천수는 $6{\sim}10$개, 총하천길이는 $3,501{\sim}5,500m$, 하천차수는 2차수, 일차하천수는 $6{\sim}10$개, 사면경사는 $31^{\circ}$이상의 지역으로 평가되었으며, III급지(비 위험지역)는 퇴적암지역으로 임상은 혼효림, 임령은 25년생 이상, 토심은 $41{\sim}50cm$, 토성은 미사질식양토(SiCL), 석 력함량은 10% 이하, 사면방위는북${\sim}$$(N{\sim}W)$사면, 주하천길이는 500m 이하, 총하천수는 5개 이하, 총하천길이는 1,000m 이하, 하천차수는 1차수, 일차하천수는 2개 이하, 사면경사는 $25^{\circ}$이하의 지역으로 평가되었다. 붕괴위험 예측치를 이용하여 붕괴위험지역을 예지한 결과 점수의 합계가 I급지는 4.8052점 이상이며 II급지는 4.8051점에서 2.5602점 사이에 해당하며 III급지는 2.5601점 이하의 지역으로 분석되었다.

This study was carried out to analyze the characteristics of forest watershed factors by using the quantification theory(I) for evaluation and prediction of the failure hazard area. Present $sediment(m^3/yr/ha)$ of erosion control dams were investigated in 95 sites of erosion control dam constructed during 1986 to 1999 in Gyeongnam province. The results obtained from this study were summarized as follows; General condition of class I(Very hazard area) were as follow; Igneous rock in parent rock, coniferous in forest type, below 20year in stand age, below 30cm in soil depth, SCL in soil texture, $31{\sim}40%$ in gravel contents, $S{\sim}E$ in aspect, $2,501{\sim}3,600m$ in length of main stream, $26{\sim}30$ in number of total streams, $6,601{\sim}10,000m$ in length of total streams, over 3 in stream order, over 16 in number of first streams order and over $31^{\circ}$ of slope gradient. General condition of class IIl(hazard area) were as follow; Metamorphic rock in parent rock, hardwood in forest type, over $21{\sim}24year$ in stand age, $31{\sim}40cm$ in soil depth, SiCL or SCL in soil texture, $11{\sim}20%$ in gravel contents, $S{\sim}W$ in aspect, $1,501{\sim}2,600m$ in length of main stream, $6{\sim}10$ in number of total streams, $3,501{\sim}5,500m$ in length of total streams, 2 in stream order, $6{\sim}10$ in number of first streams order and over $31^{\circ}$ of slope gradient. General condition of class III(Un hazard area) were as follow; Sedimentary rock in parent rock, mixed in forest type, over 25year in stand age, $41{\sim}50cm$ in soil depth, SiCL in soil texture, below 10% in gravel contents, $N{\sim}W$ in aspect, below 500m in length of main stream, below 5 in number of total streams, below 1,000m in length of total treams, below 1 in stream order, below 2 in number of first streams order and below $25^{\circ}$ of slope gradient. The prediction method of suitable for failure hazard area divided into class I, II, and III for the convenience of use. The score of class I evaluated as a very hazard area was over 4.8052. A score of class II was 4.8051 to 2.5602, it was evaluated as a hazard area, and class III was below 2.5601, it was evaluated as a un hazard area.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 姜渭平, 村井宏, 大村寬, 麻鎬變(1986) 數量化(II)에 의한 山沙汰斜面의 危險度判別. 韓國林學會誌 75:32-37
  2. 建設交通部(1999) 河川 工事計劃과 砂防計劃과 設計施 工. 226p
  3. 산림청(2000) 임업통계연보
  4. 정원옥(2001) 임도 절토 비탈면의 안정과 식생활착에 미치는 환경인자의 영향.한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 4(2): 74-83
  5. 崔 敬(1986) 韓國의 山沙汰發生要因과 豫知에 關한 研究. 江原大學校博士學位論文
  6. 崔敬(1999) 임도사면에서의 붕괴발생원인과 방지대책. 산림 405: 50-53
  7. 海掘正博, 石川芳治, 牛山素行, 久保田哲也, 平松音也, 藤田正治, 三好岩生, 山下祐一(1999) 1999年6月29日 廣島土砂災害に關 する緊急調查報告(速報). 砂防學會誌 52(3): 34-43
  8. 平野宗夫, 疋田誠, 森山總之(1986) 活火山流域における 土石流の設生限界と流出規模の予測. 第30回水理議 溝曾論文集
  9. 平野宗夫, 橋本晴行, 河野通濟(1994) 1993年雲仙におけ る土石流の現地観測, 水工學論文集第 38:747・752
  10. 福永寛之(1993) 風害發生 と立地及ぴ林分構造因子との 關係解析. 林業技術 6: 19・34
  11. 梶原規弘, 塚本次郎, 入国慎太郎(1999) ヒノキ人工林に おける下層植生のタイプと土壌侵蝕危険度との關係.日林誌 81(1): 42-50
  12. 竹下敬司(1971) 山と地形. 治山調査と地形の見方. 山林 航測. No. 86
  13. 竹下敬司, 金錫權(1993) ダウンパーストによる森林被 害と地形との關係解析.1991年台風19号による風倒 木被害-.日林論 104:347-348
  14. 竹下敬司, 高木潤治(1997) 暖帯林地の水保全環境に關 する土壌及ぴ地形的研究.福岡縣林試時報 26: 1-51
  15. 三浦 覺, 松本陽介, 進下育久(1983) 台風15号 (昭和56年) により東京大學北海道演習林に發生した風害の要 因解析. 東大演報 73: 139-160
  16. 淵本正隆(1972) 地形主航空寫進. 山林航測. No. 93
  17. 新版 標準土色帖(1997) 農林水產省農林水產技術會議事務局
  18. 小河誠司, 佐佐木重行, 野田亮, 野中重之, 廣田篤彥, 福島敏彥, 宮原文彥(1992) 1991年9月仁發生した台風 17号 19号による森林被害調查報告書. 福岡縣林試研究資料, No. 18, 89p
  19. 大石道夫(1999) 新にた砂防調査 計劃の基本的な考え 方. 砂防事會誌 52(2): 1-3
  20. 諌本信義, 高宮立身(1992a) 1991年9月台風19号により 議生した大分縣における森林被害の要因解析. 大分縣林試時報 18: 1-43
  21. 諌本信義, 高宮立身(1992b) 1991年9月台風19号により 發生した大分縣における森林被害の要因解析. 森林立地 34(2): 98-105
  22. 平松晋也, 石川芳治, 小山内信智, 三好岩生(1999) 1999 年6月29日徳島県系西組谷山村で設生した土砂災害 (速報). 砂防學會誌 52(3): 44-49
  23. 塚本良側. 小橋燈治編(1991) 新砂防工學. 朝創書店
  24. 志水俊夫(1977) 花崗岩地帯の斜面の安定性に關する統 計的解析. 日林誌 59(5): 186-190
  25. 志水俊夫(1978) 崩壞の危険かある斜面の判定-その理論と手法-. 林業技術 439:23-26
  26. Carroll C, Merton L. and Burger P .(2000) Impact of vegetative cover and slope on runoff, erosion and water quality for field plots on a range of soil and spoil materials on central Queensland coal mines. Austrlian journal of soil research 38(2): 313-327 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR99052
  27. Chaplot V. and Le Bissonnais Y.(2000) Field measurements of interrill erosion under different slopes and plot sizes. Earth surface processes and landforms 25(2): 145-153 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(200002)25:2<145::AID-ESP51>3.0.CO;2-3
  28. O'Loughlin, C. and R. R. Ziemer(1983) The importance of root strengh and deterioration rates upon edaphic stability in steepland forests. NZFS Reprint 1570: 70-78
  29. Strahler, A. N.(1952) Dynamic Basis of Geomorphology. Geological Society of Americal, Bulletin 63: 923-938