Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지

Measurement Issues across Different Cultures

  • Published : 2006.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. The purposes of this methodologic paper are to (1) describe theoretical background in conducting research across different cultures; (2) address measurement issues related to instrument administration; and (3) provide strategies to deal with measurement issues. Methods. A thorough review of the literature was conducted. A theoretical background is provided, and examples of administering instrument in studies are described. Results. When applying an instrument to different cultures, both equivalence and bias need to be established. Three levels of equivalence, i.e., construct equivalence, measurement unit equivalence, and full score comparability, need to be explained to maintain the same concept being measured. In this paper, sources of bias in construct, method, and item are discussed. Issues related to instrument administration in a cross-cultural study are described. Conclusion. Researchers need to acknowledge various group differences in concept and/or language that include a specific set of symbols and norms. There is a need to question the philosophical and conceptual appropriateness of an assessment measure that has been conceptualized and operationalized in a different culture. Additionally, testing different response formats such as narrowing response range can be considered to reduce bias.

Keywords

References

  1. Allalouf, A., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (1999). Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items. J of Edu Meas, 36(3),185-198 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00553.x
  2. Bernal, H., Wooley, S., & Schensul, J. J. (1997). The challenge of using Likert-type scales with low-literate ethnic populations. Nurs Res, 46(3), 179-181 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199705000-00009
  3. Boyle, J. S. (2000). Transcultural nursing: where do we go from here? J of Transcultural Nurs, 11(1), 10-11 https://doi.org/10.1177/104365960001100103
  4. Byrne, B. M. & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. J of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555-574 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030005001
  5. Corless, U. B., Nicholas, P. K., & Nokes, K. M. (2005). Issues in cross-cultural quality of life research. Image: J of Nurs Schol, 33(1), 15-20
  6. Halbreich, H. & Karkun, S. (2006) Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. J of Affect Disorder, Feb, 5
  7. Im, E., Page, R., Lin, L., Tsai, H., & Cheng, C. (2005). Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research. Int J of Nurs Stu, 41, 891-899
  8. King, M. et al. (2005). Psychotic symptoms in the general population of England-a comparison of ethnic groups (The EMPIRIC study). Soc Psych & Psych Epi, 40(5), 375-81 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0900-7
  9. Kao, H., Hsu, M., & Clark, L. (2004). Conceptualizing and critiquing culture in health research. J of Transcultural Nurs 15(4), 269-277 https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659604268963
  10. Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res in Nur & Health, 25, 295-306 https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10041
  11. Leininger, M. (1999). What is transcultural nursing and culturally competent care- J of Transcultural Nurs, 10(1),9 https://doi.org/10.1177/104365969901000105
  12. Ng, T. P., Lim, L. C., Jin, A., & Shinfuku, N. (2005). Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore. Quality of Life Res, 14(7), 1755-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1741-2
  13. Ng, S. M., Yau, J. K., Chan, C. L., Chan, C. H., & Ho, D. Y. (2005). The measurement of body-mind-sprit well-being toward multidimensionality and transcultural applicability. Social Work in Health Care, 41(1),33-52 https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v41n01_03
  14. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed). New York: McGraw Hill
  15. Owens, L., Johnson, T. P., & O'Rourke, D. (1999). Culture and item nonresponse in health surveys. Paper presented at the meeting of The 7th Conference on Health Survey Research Methods. Williamsburg, VA
  16. Shah, A., Ellanchenny, N., & Shu, G. H. (2005). A comparative study of behavioral psychological symptoms of dementia in patients with Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia referred to psychogeriatric services in Korea and the U.K. Int Psychogeriatrics, 17(2), 207-19 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610205001468
  17. Van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. Eur J of Psych Assess, 13, 21-29 https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.21
  18. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). NY: Springer Publishing Company