Simulation of ECT Bobbin Coil Probe Signals to Determine Optimum Coil Gap

  • Kong, Young-Bae (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Song, Sung-Jin (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Hwan (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Yu, Hyung-Ju (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Nam, Min-Woo (Nondestructive Evaluation Center, Korea Electric Power Research Institute) ;
  • Jee, Dong-Hyun (Nondestructive Evaluation Center, Korea Electric Power Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Jong (Nondestructive Evaluation Center, Korea Electric Power Research Institute)
  • Published : 2006.12.30

Abstract

Eddy current testing (ECT) signals produced by a differential bobbin coil probe vary according to probe design parameters such as the number of turns, geometry and coil gap size. In the present study, the characteristics of a differential bobbin coil probe signals are investigated by numerical simulation in order to determine the optimum coil gap. For verification of numerical simulation accuracy, a specially designed bobbin probe of which the coil gap can be adjusted is fabricated and a series of experiments to acquire signals from two kinds of standard tubes with the variation in coil gap is performed. Then, the experimental signals are compared to the simulation results. Based on this investigation, a decision on the optimum range of coil gap is made. The theoretically predicted signals agree very well to the experimental signals. In fact, this excellent agreement demonstrates a high potential of the simulation as a design optimization tool for ECT bobbin probes.

Keywords

References

  1. Electric Power Research Institute (2005) Pressurized Water Reactor Steam Generator Examination Guidelines, Revision 6, pp. 720-21
  2. Nam, M. W., Cho, C. H., Jee, D. H., Jung, J. H. and Lee, H. J. (2006) An Analysis of Signal Characteristics due to Coil-Gap Variation of ECT Bobbin Probe for Steam Generator Tube, Proceedings of 2006 Annual Spring Conference of KSNT, pp. 283-290
  3. Victor Technologies (2005) VlC-3D User Manual, Bloomington, Indianapolis
  4. Dunbar, W. S. (1985) The Volume Integral Method of Eddy Current Modeling, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 43-53
  5. Yoo, J. Y., Kim, C. H., Jung, H. J., Song, S. J., Choi, Y. H., Kang, S. C., Song, M. H. and Jung, H. K. (2005) Prediction and Evaluation of Rotating Pancake Coil Probe Signals Simulated from Steam Generator Tubes, D. O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Eds.), Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 25A, AlP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, NY, pp. 383-390
  6. American Society for Nondestructive Testing (1986) Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4 Electromagnetic Testing, pp. 593