References
- 김금희, 초현실주의, 열화당, 2003
- 박신의 역, 자유구상, 열화당, 1990
- 박영순 외 역, 인테리어디멘션, 디자인하우스, 1996
- 이일, 현대미술의 궤적, 서울동아출판사, 1974
- 전경희 역, 팝아트, 열화당, 1988
- 정무정, 미니멀리즘, 열화당, 2003
- 이춘섭, 모더니즘이후의 실내디자인, 형성출판사, 2004
This study is about objectified spatial composition. The Interior Design field has grown and established its major trends dependent upon other related field of study. With this perspective in mind, esthetics on Interior Design has to be treated in similar manner. In modem architects or fine artists have defined the terminology 'objectification' theoretical principle where by unable to distinguish between 'object's type' and 'objects', Presently, the term 'objectified' became a trend word. In order to confront misconception of the idea of 'objectification', some people define as reflection of this complex society. There are five types in expression of objectified spatial composition in Interior Design. Which are free form spatial composition through artistry of artists, fantastic spatial composition by polysemous collision, symbolic spatial composition from the metaphorical of form, aggregate spatial composition by geometric collision and geometric superimposition, and cultural spatial composition. Therefore, this study aims to help understanding of tendency in various space expressions in Interior Design through searching how to express type of objectified spatial composition in Interior Design from 2000 through 2005.