• Published : 2006.01.01


The watersheds are functional geographical areas that integrate a variety of environmental and ecological processes and human impacts on landscapes. Geographical assessments using GIS recognize the relationship between interdependence of resources and ecological/environmental components in watersheds. They are useful methodology for viable long term natural resource management. This paper performs through the using hydrological analyses, landscape ecological analyses, remote sensing, and GIS. Indicators are items or measures that represent key components of the small watersheds, and they are developed to be evaluated. Some indicators are described that they represent watershed condition and trend as well as focus on physical, biological and chemical properties of small watershed. Also, ecological functions such as stability, resilience, and sensitivity are inferred from them. The model implemented in GIS allows to reflect the ecological and hydrological functioning of watershed. Methodology from image analysis, landscape ecological analysis, spatial interpolation, and numerical process modeling are integrated within GIS to provide assessment for eco-logical/environmental condition. Results are described from the small watershed of Gwynns Falls in Baltimore County and Baltimore City, Maryland, an area of about 66.5 square miles. The small watershed within Gwynns Falls watershed are subject to a number of land-use. But it is predominantly urban, with significantly lesser amounts of forest and agriculture. The increasing urbanization is ass-coiated with ecological/environmental impacts and citizen conflicts.



  1. Aspinall, R. J. and Hill, M. J. (1997). Land cover change: A method for assessing the reliability of land-cover changes measured from remotely sensed data. In IGARSS '97 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceeding (T.L. Stein, ed). IEEE Publications, Piscataway, New jersey, Vol. 1, pp. 275-277
  2. Aspinall, R. J. and Pearson, D. M. (1995). Describing and managing uncertainty of categorical maps in GIS. In Innovations in GIS 2 (P.F. Fisher, ed), pp 71-83. London: Taylor and Francis
  3. Bellamy, J.A., McDonald, G. T., Syme, G. J. And Butterworth, J. E. (1999). Evaluating integrated resource management. Society and Natural Resources 12, 337-353
  4. Bennett, D. A., Sengupta, R., Beaulieu, J. R., and Kraft, S. E. (2000). Integrating simulation models and spatial information for environmental problem solving. In Spatial Information for Land Use Management (M. J. Hill and R. J. Aspinall, eds). Reading: Gordon and Breach
  5. Brown, D. G. (1998a). Classification and boundary vagueness in mapping presettlement forest types. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12, 105-129
  6. Brown, D. G. (1998b). Mapping historical forest types in Baraga County, Michigan as fuzzy sets. Plant Ecology 134, 97-111
  7. Clayton, A. M. H. and Radcliffe, N. J. (1996). Sustainability: A Systems Approach, 258 pp. London: Earthscan Publications
  8. Conroy, M. J. (2000). Mapping biodiversity for conservation and land use decisions. In Spatial Information forLand Use Management (M. J. Hill and R. J. Aspinall, eds). Reading: Gordon and Breach
  9. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1994). Landscape Monitoring and Assessment Research Plan. US EPA 620/R-94/009
  10. Frohn, R. C.(1998). Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology: New Metric Indicators for Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of Ecosystems, 99 pp. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publications
  11. Haines-Young, R.H.(1999). Environmental accounts for land cover: Their contribution to state of the environment reporting. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24, 441-456
  12. Hamblin, A, 1998. Environmental Indicators for National State of the Environment Report. The land. Australian State of the Environment Report. Melbourne( )
  13. Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G. and Miller, J. P.(1964). Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, 522 pp. San Franciso, Wh. H. Freeman
  14. Ludwig, J. A., Tongway, D., Freudenberger, D., Noble, J. and Hodgkinson, K.(1997). Landscape Ecology, Function and Management. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing
  15. Moore, I. D. and Gallant, J.C.(1991). Overview of hydrological and water quality modelling. In Modelling the Fate of Chemicals in the Environment (I.D. Moore, ed.), pp. 1-8. Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University
  16. Oliver, M., Webster, R. and Gerrard, J. (1989a). Geostatistics in physical geography. Part I: Theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 14, 259-269
  17. Oliver, M., Webster, R. and Gerrard, J. (1989b). Geostatistics in physical geography. Part II: Applications. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 14, 270-286
  18. Rhind (1991). Geographical Information Systems and environmental problems. International Social Science Journal XLIII, 649-668
  19. US Geological Survey (USGS) (1990). US GeoData 1: 250,000 and 1:100,000 Scale Land Use and Land Cover and Associated Maps Digital Data. USGS, Reston, Virginia.(
  20. Walker, J. (1997). Conditional Health Indicators as a Proxy for Sustainability Indicators. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 6/97. Canberra
  21. Walker, J. and Reuter, D. G. (1996). Indicators of Catchment health: A Technical Perspective. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing
  22. Whitehead, P. and Gorman, J. (1999). Defining and measuring the health of savanna landscape: a north Australian perspective. In Proceedings from Ecosystem health Workshop, 28-29th May 1999, Darwin