DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation Analysis Between Forest Volume, ETM+ Bands, and Height Estimated from C-Band SRTM Product

  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Yonsei University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Hong (Yonsei University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Bin (Yonsei University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Heo, Joon (Yonsei University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
  • Published : 2006.10.31

Abstract

Forest stand height and volume are important indicators for management purpose as well as for the environmental analysis. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) is backscattered over forest canopy and DSM can be acquired from such scattering characteristic, while National Elevation Dataset (NED) provides bare earth elevation data. The difference between SRTM and NED is estimated as tree height, and it is correlated with forest parameters, it is correlated with forest parameters, including average DBH, Trees per acre, net BF per acre, and total Net MBF. Especially, among them, net Board Foot(BF) per acre is the index that well represents forest volume. The Project site was Douglas-fir dominating plantation area in the western Washington an the northern Oregon in the U.S. This study shows a relationship of high correlation between the forest parameters and the product from SRTM, NED, and ETM+. This research performs multi regression analysis and regression tree algorithm, and can get more improved relationship between several parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Cunningham, R. et al, 2004. The Louisiana statewide LiDAR project, Technical report
  2. Global Land Cover Facility (GLCF), http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu
  3. Hoffmann, J. et al, 2006. How complementary are SRTM-X and -C band digital elevation models?, PE&RS, 72(3): 261-268 https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.3.261
  4. Huang, C. et al, 2001. A strategy for estimating tree canopy density using LANDSAT 7 ETM+and high resolution images over large areas. International conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and forestry, CDROM
  5. Hyde, P. et al, 2006. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sensing of Environmental, 102: 63-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.021
  6. Joon, H. et al, 2006. Quality Improvement of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation inventory GIS using shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) and the national elevation dataset (NED), Forest Ecology Management, 233: 61-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.007
  7. Ludwig, R. et al, 2006. Validation of digital elevation models from SRTM X-SAR for applications in hydrologic modelling. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 60: 339-358 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.05.003
  8. Simard, M. et al, 2006. Mapping height and biomass of mangrove forests in everglades national park with SRTM elevation data, PE&RS, 72(3): 299-311 https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.3.299
  9. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2003. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Documentation: SRTM Topo. http://edcftp.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/srtm/documentation/SRTM_Topo.txt
  10. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2005. The USGS National Elevation Dataset. http://ned.usgs.gov
  11. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2006. The National Map Seamless Data Distribution System. http://seamless.usgs.gov