대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지

간호학 특성을 반영한 4년제 간호교육 평가인정 표준 및 기준 개발

Development of Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of a Baccalaureate Nursing Education Program: Reflections on the Unique Characteristics of the Nursing Profession

  • Kim, Cho-Ja (College of Nursing, Yensei University) ;
  • Ahn, Yang-Heui (Department of Nursing, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Won (Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing) ;
  • Jeong, Yeon-Ok (Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Hee (University of Maryland School of Nursing)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics of nursing science and identify expected outcomes from baccalaureate graduates, and to develop accreditation standards and criteria reflecting the characteristics of the nursing profession. Methods: A methodological research design was utilized in this study. Related literature reviews and the nursing education program goals and objectives of the 99 nursing schools in Korea were analyzed. A cross-sectional survey research design was utilized to test the validity of the developed characteristics of the nursing profession and their accreditation criteria and standards. The face validity was from the advisory committee and public committee hearing. Results: The characteristics of nursing science were defined with five concepts including humanity, scientific knowledge, professionalism, therapeutic relationship, and facilitating well-being. The expected outcomes from graduates were identified as providing holistic nursing, critical thinking, establishing professionalism and leadership, construction of a therapeutic relationship, and skilled nursing practice. Finally6 standards and 14 criteria reflecting the unique characteristics of the nursing profession were developed for accreditation. These proposed accreditation standards and criteria are a challenge to promote the quality of nursing science.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, Y. R., Park, K. S., Yang, S. O., Shin, K. R., & Kim, M. J. (2005). Development of standards and criteria for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education program. J Educ Eval Health Professions, 2(1), 87-103 https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2005.2.1.87
  2. Ahn, Y. R. (2004). Critical thinking and the standards of nursing education. J Educ Eval Health Professions, 1(1), 99-106 https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2004.1.1.99
  3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (1998). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington D.C. : American Association of Colleges of Nursing
  4. Bandman, E. L., & Bandman, B. (1995). Critical yhinking in nursing. Norwalk, Connecticut : Appleton & Lange
  5. Bishop, A. H., & Scudder, J. R. (1997). A phenomenological interpretation of holistic nursing. J Holistic Nurs, 15(2), 103-111 https://doi.org/10.1177/089801019701500203
  6. Bishop, A. H., & Scudder, J. R. (1999). A philosophical interpretation of nursing. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice. Sch Inq Nurs Pract, 13(1), 17-27
  7. Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) Accreditation (2004). Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education 2004. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http;//www.aacn.nche.edu/Accreditation/checklist.htm
  8. Fesler-Birch, D. M. (2005). Critical thinking and patient ourcomes: A review. Nurs Outlook, 53, 59-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2004.11.005
  9. Kim, M. W. (2004). Development of objectives of nursing clinical education, based on the nursing core competency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul
  10. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing (2003). Report on validity of accreditation for nursing education program. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
  11. Korean Nurses Association (2002). 2001 survey on nursing education programs. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
  12. Korean Nurses Association (2004). Report on nursing standards development. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
  13. Korean Nurses Association. (1997). Standards of nursing education programs. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
  14. Lee, J. S., & Lee, M. S. (2000). University accreditation and evaluation of medical education. Yonsei J Medi Edu, 2(1), 1-15
  15. Lee, M. S., & Kim, S. (1999). Clinical performance evaluation in nursing. Korean J Nurs Query, 8(1), 39-59
  16. Liaschenko, J., & Peter, E. (2004). Nursing ethics and conceptualizations of nursing : Profession, practice and work. J Advan Nurs, 46(5), 488-495 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03011.x
  17. National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (2004). Accreditation manual 2004. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http://www.nlnac.org/defaultl.htm
  18. Oh, S. S. (2004). Characteristics of university evaluation and role of evaluation committee members. Paper presented at the 1st workshop for evaluation committee members, Korean Association Board of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul
  19. Simpson, E., & Courtey, M. (2002). Critical thinking in nursing education : Literature review. Int J Nurs Pract, 8, 89-98 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172x.2002.00340.x
  20. Task Force on Accreditation of Health Professions Education (1999). Strategies for change and improvement. San Fransisco, California : Center for the Health Professions, University of California at San Francisco
  21. USA Nursing Knowledge Consensus Conference. (1998). Consensus statement on emerging nursing knowledge, 1998. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/son/theorist/roy.pdf
  22. Yang Y. B. (2004). Problems of university evaluation and recommendations for improvement. Paper presented at the 1st workshop for evaluation committee members, Korean Association Board of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul
  23. Zhang, Z., Luk, W., Arthur, D., & Wong, T. (2001). Nursing competencies : personal characteristics contributing to effective nursing performance. J Advan Nurs, 33(4), 467-474 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01688.x