Some Insights into the Basic QA/QC for the Greenhouse Gas Analysis: Methane and Carbon Dioxide

온실가스 기기분석의 정도관리를 위한 고려사항 연구 - CH4과 CO2를 중심으로 -

  • Jeong, Jae-Hak (Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Lim, Ho-Soo (Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Hyun (Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Bae, Wi-Sup (Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Jeon, Eui-Chan (Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Sejong University)
  • 정재학 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 임호수 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 김기현 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 배위섭 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 전의찬 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과)
  • Published : 2006.10.31

Abstract

In order to investigate the analytical uncertainties associated with sampling and analysis of major greenhouse gaseous pollutants(carbon dioxide and methane), we attempted to quantify their adsorptive loss due to the contact with the container wall(such as Tedlar bag and vial). Using the GC/FID method, some basic experimental parameters(such as reproducibility and method detection limit) have been evaluated as part of the essential QA/QC The reproducibilities of carbon dioxide and methane were estimated as 2.02 and 0.2%, respectively. In addition, method detection limits were measured as 0.61 and 0.06 ng, respectively. A test of sample loss rate has also been made for Tedlar bag and vial by assessing the absolute amount of sample loss on the wall. By transferring the samples contained in Tedlar bag to various sizes of Tedlar bags, we measured differences in the absolute loss quantity due to such transfer. In addition, we also examined such loss mechanism as a function of elapsed time and light penetration rate for vial. As results, carbon dioxide and methane have shown about 2% of sample loss due to such contact. It is also noticed that the amount of loss with vial surface is lower than that of Tedlar bag. Therefore, field collection of greenhouse gases using various container types should be made more cautiously to minimize the possibility of sample loss and bias related to such loss.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경렬 (1999) 지구온난화 기체의 측정, 대기오염물질의 측정기술, 한국대기환경학회, 한국환경분석학회, 159-163
  2. 김기현, 최여진, 안지원(2005) 악취황 성분의 채취와 샘플백 내부의 시료 유실율 비교: 검량선의 기울기를 이용한 평가, 한국분석과학회지, 18(4), 338-343
  3. 김득수, 장영기, 전의찬 (2000) 플럭스챔버에 의한 매립지표면 메탄의 배출량 측정과 분석, 한국대기환경학회지, 16(5), 499-509
  4. 백성옥, 김기현, 허귀석(2004) 대기환경측정과 정도관리(I) - 원리와 방법론, 한국대기환경학회지, 20(2), 237-249
  5. 에너지관리공단(2005) 온실가스 국가배출계수 마련을 위한 기반 연구
  6. 전의찬, 사재환, 이성호, 정재학, 김기현, 배위섭 (2006) 에너지사용시설의 온실가스 배출 특성 연구-유연탄화력발전소의 이산화탄소를 중심으로-, 한국대기환경학회지, 22(1), 107-116
  7. 최여진, 전의찬, 김기현 (2005) 반월공단의 대기배출시설을 대상으로 한 악취성 황화합물의 측정과 배출특성에 대한 연구, 한국대기환경학회지, 21(5), 515-524
  8. Komhyr, W.D., R.H. Gammon, T.B. Harris, and L.S. Waterman (1985) Global Atmospheric $CO_2$ distribution & Variations from 1968-1982 NOAA/GMCC $CO_2$ Flask Sample Data Jour. of Geophy. Res., 90, 5567-5596 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD03p05567
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996) Technologies, Policies and Measures for Mitigating Climate Change
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1997) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2 Volumes: Volume 2, Workbook, Volume 3, Reference Manual, Inter-government Panel of Climate Change
  11. United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (1996) EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. USEPA Quality Assurance Division, EPA QA/G-5