DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Combined Bulk Electric System Reliability Framework Using Adequacy and Static Security Indices

  • Billinton, Roy (Power System Research Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan) ;
  • Wangdee, Wijarn (System Planning and Performance Assessment, British Columbia Transmission Corporation(BCTC))
  • Published : 2006.12.01

Abstract

Deterministic techniques have been applied in power system planning for many years and there is a growing interest in combining these techniques with probabilistic considerations to assess the increased system stress due to the restructured electricity environment. The overall reliability framework proposed in this paper incorporates the deterministic N-1 criterion in a probabilistic framework, and results in the joint inclusion of both adequacy and security considerations in system planning. The combined framework is achieved using system well-being analysis and traditional adequacy assessment. System well-being analysis is used to quantify the degree of N-1 security and N-1 insecurity in terms of probabilities and frequencies. Traditional adequacy assessment is Incorporated to quantify the magnitude of the severity and consequences associated with system failure. The concepts are illustrated by application to two test systems. The results based on the overall reliability analysis framework indicate that adequacy indices are adversely affected by a generation deficient environment and security indices are adversely affected by a transmission deficient environment. The combined adequacy and security framework presented in this paper can assist system planners to realize the overall benefits associated with system modifications based on the degree of adequacy and security, and therefore facilitate the decision making process.

Keywords

References

  1. R. Billinton and R. N. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, $2^{nd}$ Edition, Plenum Press, New York, 1996
  2. R. Billinton and W. Li, Reliability Assessment of Electrical Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods, Plenum Publishing, New York, 1994
  3. IEEE Task Force, 'Reliability Assessment of Composite Generation and Transmission Systems', IEEE Tutorial Course 90EH031I-1-PWR, February 1990
  4. M. V. F. Pereira and N. J. Balu, 'Composite Generation/Transmission Reliability Evaluation', Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 80, No.4, pp. 470-490, April 1992 https://doi.org/10.1109/5.135372
  5. L. H. Fink and K. Carlsen, 'Operating Under Stress and Strain', IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 48-53, March 1978
  6. EPRI Final Report, 'Composite-System reliability Evaluation: Phase 1 - Scoping Study', Tech. report EPRI EL-5290, Dec 1987
  7. R. Billinton and E. Khan, 'A Security Based Approach to Composite Power System Reliability Evaluation', IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 65-71, February 1992 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.141688
  8. North American Electric Reliability Council Planning Standards. Available at: http://www.nerc.com
  9. Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE), Policy 3: Operational Security (final policy 1.3 E, 20.07.2004), Association of Transmission System Operators in Continental Europe. Available at: http://www.ucte.org
  10. R. Billinton and G. Lian, 'Composite Power System Health Analysis Using a Security Constrained Adequacy Evaluation Procedure', IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, No.2, pp. 936-941, May 1994 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317653
  11. R. N. Allan and R. Billinton, 'Probabilistic Assessment of Power Systems', Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 88, No.2, pp. 140-162, February 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/5.823995
  12. W. Wangdee and R. Billinton, 'Bulk Electric System Well-Being Analysis Using Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation', IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 21, No.1, pp.188-193, February 2006 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2005.862000
  13. R. Ubeda and R. N. Allan, 'Sequential Simulation Applied to Composite System Reliability Evaluation', lEE Proceeding-C, Vol. 139, No.2, pp.81-86, March 1992
  14. A. Sankarakrishnan and R. Billinton, 'Sequential Monte Carlo simulation for composite power system reliability analysis with time varying loads', IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 10, No.3, pp. 1540-1545, August 1995 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.466491
  15. R. Billinton and W. Wangdee, 'Delivery Point Reliability Indices of a Bulk Electric System Using Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation', IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 21, No.1, pp.345-352, January 2006 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2005.855445
  16. B. Stott and O. Alsac, 'Fast Decoupled load flow', IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-93, No.3, pp. 859-869, May/June 1974 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1974.293985
  17. A. J. Wood and B. F. Wollenberg, Power System Generation, operation and control, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 1996
  18. W. Wangdee, Bulk Electric System Reliability Simulation and Application, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, 2005. Available at: http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-12152005133551
  19. R. Billinton and et al, 'A Reliability Test System for Educational Purposes- Basic Data', IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. PWRS-3, No.4, pp. 1238-1244, August 1989
  20. IEEE Task Force, 'IEEE Reliability Test System', IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-98, pp. 2047-2054, NovlDec 1979 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1979.319398

Cited by

  1. Consideration of multiple uncertainties for evaluation of available transfer capability using fuzzy continuation power flow vol.30, pp.10, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2008.08.004
  2. Total transfer capability calculation taking into consideration system uncertainties vol.19, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.239
  3. Transmission Expansion Planning Using Contingency Criteria vol.22, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.908478
  4. Deterministic-based power grid planning enhancement using system well-being analysis vol.6, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-018-0390-8