대한전자공학회논문지TC (Journal of the Institute of Electronics Engineers of Korea TC)

대한전자공학회 (The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers)
권호 표지

IEEE 802.16 TDD-OFDMA 하향링크에서의 단순 릴레이 협력 자원 관리와 수율 보장 스케줄러를 이용한 서비스 커버리지 및 섹터 수율에 관한 연구

Performance Evaluation of Simple-Relay Aided Resource Allocation and Throughput Guarantee Scheduler in IEEE 802.16 TDD-OFDMA Downlink

  • 기영민 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 변대욱 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 김동구 (연세대학교 전기전자공학과) ;
  • 손행선 (전자부품연구원 SoC센터)
  • Ki, Young-Min (Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Byun, Dae-Wook (Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Ku (Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Son, Haeng-Seon (SoC Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute)
  • 발행 : 2006.11.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 IEEE 802.16 기반의 TDD-OFDMA 하향링크의 서비스 커버리지 향상을 위한 단순 릴레이 협력 자원 관리(SRARA Simple-Relay Aided Resource Allocation) 구조를 제시하고, 채널 스케줄러가 적용되었을 때의 성능 향상을 서비스 커버리지 및 유효 섹터 수율 측면에서 분석하였다. 단순 이동 릴레이는 고정 릴레이와 달리, 송신 전력 수준이 낮고, 기지국으로부터 받은 데이터를 다른 이동 단말로 전달할 수 있는 기능만 가지며, 낮은 송신 전력 수준 때문에 제한된 개수의 부채널만을 사용할 수 있다. 모의실험에서는 PF (Proportional Fair) 및 TGS (Throughput Guarantee Scheduling) 채널 스케줄러가 고려된 SRARA 구조에 대하여, 서비스 커버리지 및 유효 섹터 수율을 평가하였다. 릴레이의 송신 전력은 500 mW와 1 W에 대해서 고려하였고, 릴레이가 사용할 수 있는 부채널의 수는 1개 또는 2개로 제한되었다. 상대적으로 낮은 송신전력인 500 mW에서는, 릴레이가 1개의 부채널로 모든 전력을 다 사용하는 방식이, 2개의 부채널로 전력을 나누어 사용하는 방식보다 커버리지 성능 향상이 우수하였다. 1 W 경우에는, 릴레이가 2개의 부채널을 사용할 때 더 많은 커버리지를 제공하였다. 상대적으로 낮은 QoS 요구조건인 64 kbps에서는 릴레이에 의한 커버리지 향상이 스케줄러 설계에 의한 커버리지 향상보다 많았지만, 128 kbps 요구조건에서는 제한된 자원만을 활용하는 릴레이보다는 TGS에 의한 서비스 영역의 향상이 크게 나타났다.

Simple-relay aided resource allocation (SRARA) schemes are incorporated with throughput guarantee scheduling (TGS) in IEEE 802.16 type TDD-OFDMA downlink to enhance service coverage, where the amount of resources at each relay is limited due to either its available power which is much smaller than base station (BS) power or the required overhead The performance of SRARA schemes is evaluated with both proportional fair (PF) and TGS schedulers at 64 kbps and 128 kbps user throughput requirements. For SRARA with RSs of relatively lower power, a scheme putting total power into only one subchannel shows larger coverage than when both subchnnels are used in a manner of equal power allocation, while the RS with evenly power-allocated two subchannels could provide larger coverage gain for a relatively higher power. In a lower target (64kbps), more improvement comes from relay scheme rather than scheduler design. For a relatively higher level (128 kbps), it comes from scheduler design rather than relay.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Shakkottai, and T. S. Rappaport, 'CrossLayer Design for Wireless Networks,' IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 41, Oct. 2003, pp. 74-80 https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2003.1235598
  2. B. Classon, P. Sartori, V. Nangia, and K. Baum, 'Multi-dimensional Adaptation and Multi-user Scheduling Techniques for Wireless OFDM Systems,' IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC2003), 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2003.1204066
  3. W. Anchun, X. Liang, Z. Shidong, X. Xibin, and Y. Yan, 'Dynamic Resource Management in the Forth Generation Wireless Systems,' International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT2003), 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2003.1209721
  4. L. Xiao, A. Wang, S. Zhou, and Y. Yao, 'A Dynamic Resource Scheduling Algorithm for OFDM System,' The 9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APPC2003), 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2003.1274395
  5. S. Das, and H. Viswanathan, 'Dynamic Power and Sub-carrier Assignment in a Multi-user OFDM System,' IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2004) https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2004.1404681
  6. K. Kim, H. Kim, and Y. Han, 'Subcarrier and Power Allocation in OFDMA Systems,' IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2004) https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2004.1400183
  7. Young Min Ki, and Dong Ku Kim, 'Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Throughput Fairness and Coverage Enhancement in TDD-OFDMA Downlink Network,' IEICE Transactions on Communications, Vol.E88-B, No.11, pp.4402-4405, Nov. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1093/ietcom/e88-b.11.4402
  8. http://www.ieee802.org/16/relay/
  9. IEEE C802.16j-06/004rl, Recommendations on IEEE 802.16j, May, 2006
  10. EEE C802.16j-06/041, Harmonized Definitions and Terminology for Mobile Multihop Relay, May 2006
  11. M. Hu, and J. Zhang, 'Opportunistic multi-access: multiuser diversity, relay-aided opportunistic scheduling, and traffic-aided smooth admission control,' Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol.9, pp.435-444, Aug. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MONE.0000031609.89077.14
  12. Y. Lee, S. Park, S. Yun, Y. Kim, and K. Kim, 'Radio Resource Management for Relay-based Cellular Systems with Sectorization,' Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF) 14 Meeting, July 2005, San Diego, California
  13. http://www.ieee802.org/16
  14. http://www.ieee802.org/16/tge/
  15. Mobile WiMAX - Part I: A Technical Overview and Performance Evaluation, WiMax Forum, Feb. 2006
  16. Mobile WiMAX - Part II: A Comparative Analysis, WiMax Forum, Feb. 2006
  17. A. Jalali, R. Padovani, and P. Pankai, 'Data Throughput of CDMA-HDR a High Efficiency-High Data Rate Personal Communication Wireless System,' The 51th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2000-Spring https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECS.2000.851593
  18. P. Ameigeiras, J, Wigard, and P. Mogensen, 'Performance of Packet Scheduling Methods with Different Degree of Fairness in HSDPA,' IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2004-Fall https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2004.1400143
  19. Recommendation ITU-R M.1225, Guideline for ？Evaluation of Radio Transmission Technologies for IMT-2000, 1997
  20. IEEE C802.20-03/79, Channel Models for IEEE 802.20 MBWA System Simulations - Rev 02, Sep. 2003
  21. IEEE C802.16e-05/141r3, CINR measurements using the EESM method, April 2005
  22. G. Senarath, S. Periyalwar, M. Smith, and R. Matyas, 'Coverage Evaluation Methodology for Next Generation Wireless Systems,' Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF) 12 Meeting, Nov. 2004. Toronto, Canada