정보처리학회논문지C (The KIPS Transactions:PartC)

한국정보처리학회 (Korea Information Processing Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

차세대 네트워크 표준화 방안에서의 이동성 기술 비교 분석

Comparison and Analysis of Mobility Support Schemes for NGN standardization plan

  • 발행 : 2006.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

차세대 네트워크에서 이동성 지원을 위해 다양한 방식이 제시되고 있으나 이들의 성능이 상대적으로 비교된 바는 없다. 따라서, 본 논문에서는 MIPv6, IP2, QMMF, IMS 방식의 위치 등록 과정과 핸드오버 절차를 분석하고, 성능 분석을 위한 파라미터 및 시뮬레이션 방법을 이용하여 각각의 절차에 대한 등록 및 핸드오버 지연 시간과 비용 측면에서 성능을 비교 분석하였다. 결과적으로 위치관리자(Location Manager)가 코어 네트워크 상의 중심에 위치한 IP2가 다른 메커니즘들에 비해 가장 좋은 성능을 보임을 확인하였다.

Various schemes for mobility support are currently proposed in NGN. However the performance comparison of all existing schemes is not relatively examined as yet. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the location registration and handover procedure of MIPv6, IP2, Q.MMF, IMS, compare and analyze the location registration time and cost and handover latency time using various performance parameters and simulation for the performance analysis. As a result of analysis, when Location Manager locates in the center of core network, IP2 showed better performance than other schemes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Thomas Towle, Seong Gon Choi, 'Mobility Management Capability Requirements for NGN,' 8th FGNGN meeting-Geneva, FGNGN-OD-00225, 24 August-2 September, 2005
  2. Debashis Saha, 'Mobility Support in IP: A survey of Related Protocols,' IEEE Network, 0890-8044/04, pp.34-36, November/December, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2004.1355033
  3. K. Nishida, S. lsobe, T. yagyu, I. Akiyoshi, 'Implementation and Evaluation of a Network-Controlled Mobility Management Protocol(IP/sup2/MM): performance evaluation compared with mobile IPv6,' WCNC 2005 IEEE, Vol.3,13-17 pp.1403-1405. March, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2005.1424721
  4. Editors, 'Draft New Recommendation Q.MMF (version 0.7),' Q.2/19 2005 July electronic meeting, MMF-05 output document, pp.3-22
  5. 3GPP TS 23.228, IMS Stage 2 (Rel.6), V6.5.0, March. 2004
  6. O. Haase, K. Murakami, 'Unified Mobility Manager: Enabling Efficient SIP/UMTS Mobile Network Control,' IEEE Wireless Communications, 1536-1284/03, pp.66-74. August, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2003.1224981
  7. Sangheon PACK, Yanghee CHOI, 'A Study on Performance of Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 in IP-Based Cellular Networks,' IEICE TRANS. COMMUN., Vol.E87-B, No.3, pp.464, MARCH, 2004
  8. Seong Gon Choi, Hyun Joo Kang, Jun Kyun Choi, 'Efficient Handover Mechanism Using the GSMP on the MPLS network,' ETRI Journal, Vol.25, No.5, pp. 369-378. Oct., 2003 https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.03.0102.0018
  9. Jiang Xie, Lan F. Akyildiz, 'A Novel Distributed Dynamic Location Management Scheme for Minimizing Signaling Costs in Mobile IP,' IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, Vol.1, No.3, pp.166-170, JULY-SEPTEMBER, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2002.1081753
  10. ITU-R draft recommendation, 'Vision, framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT-2000 and system beyond IMT 2000,' November, 2002
  11. K. Imai, M. Yabusaki, and T. Ihara, 'IP2 Architecture towards Mobile Net and Internet Convergence,' WTC2003, September, 2002
  12. V.P. Team, 'The Network Simulator-ns-2,' VINT Project Team, available at http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/, Nov., 2000
  13. K. Nishida, S. lsobe, T. yagyu, I. Akiyoshi, 'Implementation and Evaluation of a Network-Controlled Mobility Management Protocol(IP/sup2/MM): performance evaluation compared with mobile IPv6,' WCNC 2005 IEEE, Vol.3,13-17 pp.1403-1405 March, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2005.1424721
  14. M. Jo T. Okagawa, M. Sawada, M. Yabusaki, 'Address interchange procedure in mobility management architecture for IP-based IMT network platform(IP/sup 2),' ICT 2003, 10thInternational Conference, VoL. 1,23, pp.118-122, Feb.-1 March, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEL.2003.1191196
  15. O. Gonzaledz, M. Maeda, R. Hamasaki, S. Uno, T. Okagawa, K. Nishida, 'Study and Evaluation of Mobility Management for the IP-based IMT Platform(IP/sup 2) Architecture,' VTC 2003-Fall, 2003 IEEE 58th Vol.3,6-9, pp.1954, Oct., 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2003.1285366
  16. Dr. Martin Reisslein, 'Transmission delay versus propagation delay in a packet switched network'