다양한 형태의 생 비골 이식술을 이용한 경골의 재건

Reconstruction of Tibial Defects in Lower Extremity With Various Versions of Vascularized Fibula Transfer

  • 남상현 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김범진 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 고성훈 (한림대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 정윤규 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Nam, Sang-Hyun (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Bom-Jin (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Sung-Hoon (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Yoon-Kyu (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2006.05.31

초록

Twelve cases in eleven patients with segmental bone defects were treated with contralateral fibula free flap and ipsilateral island fibula flap in an antegrade, retrograde or bidirectional flow fashion. Five cases were managed with free flaps and seven were with ipsilateral fibula island transfer. Among seven cases, antegrade fashion was three, retrograde was three, and bidirectional was one. All patients were related with open tibial fractures and its sequelae except one who had open foot bone fracture. According to Gustilo's classification, ten patients were type IIIb and one was type IIIc. Basically, antegrade-flow flaps based on the peroneal vessels as in the conventional free flap were used for the proximal or middle one-third tibial defects. On the contrary, retrograde-flow flaps based on the communicating branch between the peroneal and posterior tibial vessels were used for the middle or distal one-third of the tibia. Bidirection-flow flap based on intact peroneal vessels were used for the middle portion of the tibia. The patients who have undergone ipsilateral fibula island flap had one of the following problems: a previously failed free flap, below-knee amputation of the opposite leg because of open tibial fracture, refusal to use the contralateral sound leg, or poor general condition to stand a lengthy operation. Six of the patients who have got ipsilateral fibula island flap also had an associated fibula fracture on the same leg, which was ultimately used as one of the osteotomy sites. The follow-up period was from 1 to 10 years. Two cases of free flap were failed: one patient had below-knee amputation and the other patient had ipsilateral fibula transfer. Other cases were successful and excellent hypertophy of the transferred fibula was achieved. Time to bone union ranged from 4 to 11 months. Time to full weight bearing was from 5 to 13 months after surgery. All of the transferred fibulas showed hypertrophy after weight bearing. In one case, stress fracture was developed during ambulation, which was healed conservatively. Nonunion occurred in two cases, which were treated with a long leg cast and cancellous bone graft, respectively. Length discrepancy of the legs was noted. The limb was shorter by an average 0.5 cm in three cases, longer by 1.1 cm in one case. In the case of island fibula transfer, limited arc of rotation was not a problem. Other disabling complications were not seen. We believe that these diverse modalities using a vascularized fibula will make us more comfortable to handle major bone defects.

키워드