ANALYSIS OF FAMILIAL TENDENCY IN SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCCLUSION

골격성 하악전돌증 환자의 유전적 경향에 대한 분석

  • Lee, Chang-Hwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Soo (Department of Dentistry & Oral Surgery, College of Medicine, Pochon Cha University) ;
  • Kwon, Tae-Geon (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 이창환 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이상한 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김현수 (포천중문의과대학 치과 구강외과학교실) ;
  • 권대근 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the familial tendency of the patients with mandibular prognathism in three generations and to define the relationship between the familial tendency and the skeletal class III morphology. The probands of this study were 103 orthognathic surgery patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions who had undergone (48 men, 55 women) mandibular set-back surgery. A questionnaire was given to patients who sought surgical treatment for excessive mandibular length, and all answers were confirmed in interviews. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed in cranial base parameters, mandibular positional parameters and mandibular skeletal parameters. In the examined families, 58.3% had at least one member other than the proband who had mandibular prognathism. The affected ratio of total relatives was 4.5%, and the value was higher in first-degree (13.4%) than second-degree (5.9%) and third-degree relatives (1.7%). The affected ratio was 51.9% in the offsprings who had at least one affected father or mother. The comparison of the groups according to the familial tendency showed no significant craniofacial skeletal measurments. In conclusion, skeletal class III malocclusion showed high familial tendency, suggesting a significant genetic influence in the etiology. However, the patient's familial tendency did not show the special craniofacial patterns compare to the subjects without familial tendency.

Keywords

References

  1. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby. 1993;233
  2. Monteleone L, Duvigneaud JD: Prognathism. J Oral Surg 1963;21:190-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90241-6
  3. Pascoe J, Hayward JR, Costich ER: Mandibular prognathism, its etiology and a classification. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 1960;18:21-24
  4. Downs WG: Studies in the causes of dental anomalies. J Dent Res 1928;8:367-379 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345280080030401
  5. Gold JK: A new approach to the treatment of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1945;35:893-912 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(49)90085-8
  6. Darvidov S, Geseva N, Dinceva T, Dehova L: Incidence of prognathism in Bulgaria. Dent Abstr 1961;6:240
  7. Litton SF, Ackermann LV, Isaacson RJ, Shapiro BL: A genetic study of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1970;58:565-577 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(70)90145-4
  8. Kraus BS, Wise WJ, Frie RH: Heredity and the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod 1959;45:172-217 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(59)90076-4
  9. Wolff G, Wienker TF, Sander H: On the genetics of mandibular prognathism analysis of large European noble families. J Med Genet 1993;30:112-116 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.30.2.112
  10. Nakasima A, Ichinose M, Nakata S, Takahama Y: Hereditary factors in the craniofacial morphology of Angle's Class II and Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1982;82:150-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90493-6
  11. El-Gheriani AA, Maher BS, El-Gheriani AS, Sciote JJ, Abushahba FA, Al-Azemi R, et al: Segregation analysis of mandibular prognathism in Libya. J Dent Res 2003;82:523-527 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200707
  12. 오태경, 백형선: III급 부정교합에서 두개안면 형태와 지문 유전 성향 분석. 대한치과교정학회지 2004;34:279-287
  13. Suzuki S: Studies on the so-called reverse occlusion. H Nihon University Sch Dent 1961;5:51-58
  14. Report on the survey of dental diseases. Japan: Dental Health Division of Health Policy Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. 1999
  15. 서정훈, 남동석, 장영일: 한국인 부정교합 발생 빈도에 관한 역학적 연구. 대한치과교정학회지 1984;14:33-37
  16. 유영규: 연세대학교 2,378명을 대상으로 한 부정교합빈도에 관한 연구. 대한치과교정학회지 1971;2:35-40
  17. Tang EL: The prevalence of malocclusion amongst Hong Kong male dental students. Br J Orthod 1994;21:57-63 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.21.1.57
  18. van Vuuren C: A review of the literature on the prevalence of Class III malocclusion and the mandibular prognathic growth hypotheses. Aust Orthod J 1991;12:23-28
  19. Schopf PM: Indication and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interactive measures. J Orofac Orthop 2003;64:186-200 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-003-0234-6
  20. Emrich RE, Brodie AG, Blayney JR: Prevalence of class I, Class II, and class III malocclusions(Angle) in an urban population; an epidemiological study. J Dent Res 1965;44:947-953 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345650440053301
  21. Ngan P, Hu AM, Fields HW Jr: Treatment of class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:386-395
  22. Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y: Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. Angle Orthod 2002;72:28-35
  23. Watanabe M, Naoto S, Kimie O: Mandibuar prognathism in Japan families ascertained through orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:466-470 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.018
  24. 부정교합백서 발간위원회: 한국 성인 정상교합자의 측모두부규격방사선사진 계측연구 결과보고서. 대한치과교정학회 1997
  25. Johannsdottir B, Thorarinsson F, Thordason A, Magnusson TE: Heritability and craniofacial characteristics between the parents and offspring estimated from lateral cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:200-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.033
  26. Nakata M, Yu PL, Nance WE: Multivariate analysis of craniofacial measurements in twin and family data. Am J Phys Anthropol 1974;41:423-430 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330410309
  27. Lin YC, Miyazono H, Ichinose M, Nakasima A: A study to evaluate the parent-offspring similarity in the maxillofacial profile using fingerprints in Japanese families. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1998;18:119-127
  28. Saunders SR, Popovich F, Thomson GW: A family study of craniofacial dimension in the Burlington Growth Centre sample. Am J Orthod 1980;78:394-403 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90020-2
  29. Iwagaki H: Hereditary influence of malocclusion. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1938;24:328-336 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-6347(38)90140-1
  30. Lundstrom A: Comparison of some cephalometric distances and corresponding facial proportions with regard to heritability. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:27-29 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/10.1.27
  31. Chudley AE: Genetic landmarks through philately-the Habsburg jaw. Clin Genet 1998;54:283-284 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.1998.5440404.x
  32. Schulze C, Weise W: Zur Vererburg der Progenie. Fortschr die Kiefer Orthopedie 1965;26:213-229 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163505
  33. Susami R, Kushida S, Onishi K, Ozeki S, Kuroda Y: Clinical information of anterior cross-bite cases. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1968;27:118-124
  34. Carter CO: The inheritance of congenital pyloric stenosis. Br Med Bull 1961;17:251-254 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a069918
  35. Bjork A: The nature of facial prognathism and its relation to normal occlusion of the teeth. Am J Orthod 1951;37:106-124 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(51)90024-3
  36. Sanborn RT: Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1995;25:208-222
  37. Broadbent BH Sr, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH. Bolton standards of dentofacial growth. S. Louis: Mosby. 1975
  38. Yamaguchi T, Maki K, Shibasaki Y: Growth hormone receptor gene varient and mandibular height in the normal Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:650-653 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114536
  39. Zhou J, Lu Y, Gao XH, Chen YC, Lu JJ, Bai YX, Shen Y, Wang BK: The growth hormone receptor gene is associated with mandibular height in Chinese population. J Dent Res 2005;84:1052-1056 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508401116