인간 치주인대 유래 섬유모세포에 대한 흡수성 교원질 차폐막의 생체적합성

BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF ABSORBABLE COLLAGEN MEMBRANES IN HUMAN PDL-DERIVED FIBROBLASTS IN VITRO

  • 권용대 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 이백수 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 주성숙 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강해부학교실)
  • Kwon, Yong-Dae (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Baek-Soo (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Jue, Sung-Sook (Dept. of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.30

초록

Purpose: This study is designed to evaluate biocompatibility of three types of absorbable collagen GBR membrane in vitro. Material and Method: The human PDL fibroblasts culture was obtained through typical way and the cells used in the experiment was forth passage. The membranes examined were Experimental group A, B, C. All the 3-experimental groups were made of bovine pericardium and the membranes were excised into 5$\times$5mm respectively. The samples of the membranes were fixed on the 24-well plate with the double-sided adhesive tape. Then, 2ml of cell suspension which included $2{\times}10^4$cells was inoculated into the 24-well plate, and the cells were cultured for 1 week. Cellular viability and the alkaline phosphatase activity were measured with ELISA. The membranes in the culture were processed to examine with SEM. Results: The survival rate was highest in control and Experimental group A is the next, group B and group C in order of the value. The values are analyzed for statistical difference using Wilcoxon test. All the values of experimental groups are significantly lower than those of control, and the vaules among the experimental groups significantly differ from each other. Alkaline phosphatase level was identical order with the viable cell rate. SEM examination revealed that the PDL fibroblasts adherent on culture dish (control) and group A were spindle-shaped, but on group B and C, the cells were round-shaped without processes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gottlow J, Nyman S, Karring T, Lindhe J: New attachment formation as the result of controlled tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:494-503 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1984.tb00901.x
  2. Caffesse RG, Dominguez LE, Nasjleti CE, Castelli WA, Morrison EC, Smith BA: Furcation defects in dogs treated by guided tissue regeneration (GTR). J Periodontol 1990;61:45501
  3. Gottlow J: Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and nonresorbable devices: initial healing and long-term result. J Periodontol 1993;64:1157-1165 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1157
  4. Machtei EE, Cho MI, Dunford R, Norderyd J, Zambon JJ, Genco RJ: Clinical, microbiological, and histological factors which influence the success of regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1994;65:154-161 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.2.154
  5. Selvig KA, Kersten, BG, Chamberlain AD, Wikesjo UM, Nilveus RE: Regenerative surgery of intrabony periodontal defects using ePTFE barrier membranes: scanning electronmicroscopic evaluation of retrieved membranes vs. clinical healing. J Periodontol 1992;63:974-978 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.974
  6. Tempro PJ, Nalbandian J: Colonization of retrieved polytetrafluoroethylene membranes: morphological and microbiological observations. J Periodontol 1993;64:162-168 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.3.162
  7. Yaffe A, Ehrlich J, Shoshan S: Restoration of periodontal attachment employing enriched collagen solution in the dog. J Periodontol 1984;55:623-628 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.11.623
  8. Yukna CN, Yukna RA: Multicenter evaluation of bioabsorbable collagen membrane for guided tissue regeneration in human class II furcations. J Periodontol 1996;67:650-6577 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.7.650
  9. Payne JM, Cobb CM, Rapley JW, Killoy WJ, Spencer P: Migration of human human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J Periodontol 1996;67:236-244 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.3.236
  10. Ha ¨mmerle CHF, Lang NP: Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:9-18 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001009.x
  11. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Polansky RA, Jakse N, Wegscheider WA: Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:274-280 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x
  12. Wang H-L, Miyauchi M, Takata T: Initial attachment of osteoblasts to various guided bone regeneration membranes: an in vitro study. J Periodont Res 2002;37:340-344 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01625.x
  13. Simain-Sato F, Lahmouzi J, Kalykakis GK, Heinen E, Defresne MP, De Pauw MC, Grisar T, Legros JJ, Legrand R: Culture of gingival fibroblasts on bioabsorbable regenerative materials in vitro. J Periodontol 1999;70:1234-1239 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.10.1234
  14. Takata T, Wang H-L, and Miyauchi M: Attachment, proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament cells on various guided tissue regeneration membranes. J Periodont Res 2001;36:322-3278 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360508.x
  15. Takata T, Wang H-L, Miyauchi M: Migration of osteoblastic cells on various guided bone regeneration membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:332-338 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004332.x
  16. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Herten M, Scherbaum W, Becker J: Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:443-449 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x
  17. Kononen M, Hormia M, Kivilahti J, Hautaniemi J, Thesleff I: Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1325-1341 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820261006
  18. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM: Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1992;7:302-310
  19. Burridge K, Molony L, Kelly T: Adhesion plaques: sites of transmembrane interaction between the extracellular matrix and the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci (Suppl) 1987;8:211-229-606
  20. Sela MN, Kohavi D, Krausz E, Steinberg D, Rosen G: Enzymatic degradation of collagen-guided tissue regeneration membranes by periodontal bacteria. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:263-268 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140302.x
  21. Quteish D, Dolby AE: The use of irradiated-crosslinked human collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:476-484 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb01160.x
  22. Speer DP, Chvapil M, Eskelson CD, Ulreich J: Biological effects of residual glutaraldehyde in glutaraldehyde-tanned collagen biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1980;14:753-7647 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820140607
  23. Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL: Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:80-90 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x
  24. Pitaru S, Noff M, Grosskopf A, Moses O, Tal H, Savion N: Heparan sulfate and fibronectin improve the capacity of collagen barriers to prevent apical migration of the junctional epithelium. J Periodontol 1991;62:598-601 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.10.598
  25. Folkman J, Moscona A: Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978;273:345-349 https://doi.org/10.1038/273345a0