Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

  • 제32권2호
  • /
  • Pages.161-167
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 2234-7550(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-5930(eISSN)
대한구강악안면외과학회 (The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
권호 표지

하악 제3대구치의 맹출 양상과 치관주위염과의 상관관계

CORRELATION OF PERICORONITIS AND ERUPTION STATE OF THE MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR

  • 정정권 (인제대학교 의과대학 상계백병원 구강악안면외과)
  • Cheong, Jeong-Kwon (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
  • 발행 : 2006.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: Pericoronitis was the most common indication for mandibular third molar surgery and there are no universally acceptable predictive criteria for pericoronitis occurrence. This study was designed to analyze the correlation of the pericoronitis and the eruption state of the mandibular third molar using panoramic radiographs statistically. Materials and Methods: 218 patients whose chief complaint was the extraction of the mandibular third molar were examined. The presence and absence of pericoronitis, age, sex, position of extraction site, angulation, impaction degree, position to the anterior border of mandibular ramus, distance between distal cementoenamel junction of second molar and mesial cementoenamel junction of the mandibular third molar were assessed. Then the correlation of pericoronitis and the eruption state of the mandibular third molar were analyzed by Student's t-test and chi-square test. Results: There was no correlation between Pericoronitis and age, sex, position of the mandibular third molar. The angulation(P=0.005), impaction degree(P=0.043), relation with anterior border of mandibular ramus(P=0.003), distance between distal cementoenamel junction of second molar and mesial cementoenamel junction of the mandibular third molar(P<0.05) were correlated with pericoronitis. Conclusions: The occurrence of the pericoronitis can be predicted by the eruption state of the mandibular third molar such as angulation, impaction degree, relation with anterior border of mandibular ramus, distance between distal cementoenamel junction of second molar and mesial cementoenamel junction of third molar.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2002. p.142-144
  2. Venta I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Meurman J, Ylipaavalniemi P: Assessing the eruption of lower third molars on the basis of radiographic features. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;29:259-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(91)90194-A
  3. Laskin DM: Evaluation of the third molar problem. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:824-828 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0130
  4. Bataineh AB, Albashaireh ZS, Hazza'a AM: The surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a study in decision making. Quintessence Int 2002;33:613-617
  5. Leone SA, Edenfield MJ, Cohen ME: Correlation of acute pericoronitis and the position of the mandibular third molar. Oral Surg 1986;62:245-250 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90001-0
  6. Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M: Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:10-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80371-4
  7. 이동근, 김복중: 하악 제3대구치의 위치와 치관 주위염과의 관계 에 대한 연구. 대한치과의사협회지 1989;27:201-209
  8. Richardson ME: The etiology and prediction of mandibular third molar impaction. Angle Orthod 1977;47:165-172
  9. de Boer MP, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G: Complications after mandibular third molar extraction. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:779-784
  10. Shiller WR: Position changes in mesioangular impacted third molars during a year. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:460-464 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0295
  11. Pell JG, Gregory T: Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod 1942;28:660-666
  12. Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M: Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:10-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80371-4
  13. Kay LW: Investigations into the nature of pericoronitis. Br J Oral Surg 1966;3:188-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-117X(65)80033-6
  14. Mercier P, Precious D: Risks and benifits of removal of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:17-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80447-3
  15. Wallace JR: Pericoronitis and military dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;22:545-547 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90436-1
  16. Richardson ME: The development of third molar impaction and its prevention. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:122-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80021-X
  17. Kruger GO: Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th ed. Mosby; 1984
  18. Hellman M: Some aspects of wisdom teeth and their impactions. Arch Clin Oral Path 1938;2:12
  19. Kramer RM, Williams AC: The incidence of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970;29:237-241 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(70)90091-5
  20. Bjork A, Jensen E, Palling M: Mandibular growth and third molar impaction. Acta Odont Scand 1956;14:231-272 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016355609019762
  21. Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS: Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. JADA 1980;101:240-245
  22. Lysell L, Brehmer B, Knutsson K, Rohlin M: Judgement on removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars: influence of the perceived likelihood of pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;22:173-177 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.22.4.8181642