DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Clarified Mixed Apple and Carrot Juice Production

반응표면 분석을 이용한 사과.당근 혼합주스의 청징공정 최적화

  • Seog, Eun-Ju (Division of Food Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Ho (Division of Food Engineering, Daegu University)
  • Published : 2006.08.30

Abstract

Response surface methodology was used to investigate the quality of clarified mixed apple and carrot juices using ultrafitration. Apple and carrot juices were blended at the ratio of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1. A three-variable, three-level central composite design was employed where the independent variables were the blend ratio, temperature and average transmembrane pressure (ATP). With increasing temperature and pressure, flux linearly increased regardless of blending ratio. Blend juice with 75% apple showed the highest soluble sugar and total sugar content in apple and carrot blend juices. Soluble solid contents were more affected by blending ratio than temperature and ATP. Total sugar contents were greatly affected by temperature; increasing temperature led to higher total sugar content up to $25^{\circ}C$. Higher carrot ratio led to higher vitamin C content. In general, higher acidity was achieved by higher apple content and acidity was increased with increasing temperature. Turbidity increased for all samples as APT increased, with the blending ratio of 1:1 (apple:carrot) showing the highest turbidity. Viscosity was greatly changed in the blending ratio of 3:1 (apple:carrot) juice. The polynomial models developed by RSM were satisfactory to describe the relationships between the studied factors and the responses. Analytical optimization gave $flux=0.216\;L/m^2.h$, soluble $solids=10.39^{\circ}Brix$, total sugar=71.32 mg/mL, vitamin C=315.18 mg%, acidity=7.78 mL, turbidity=0.017, and viscosity=1.44 cp, when using a $temperature=44.97^{\circ}C$, ATP=113.57 kPa, and blend ratio=28.50%.

온도와 ATP 증가에 따라 사과.당근 배합비율과 상관없이 혼합주스의 투과플럭스가 비례적으로 증가했으며, 특히 온도변화에 따른 투과플럭스의 증가가 뚜렷했다. 사과와 당근비가 3:1인 실험구에서 가용성 고형분과 총당의 함량이 높게 측정되었고, 가용성 고형분의 경우 시료배합비율의 영향이, 총당의 경우 온도의 영향이 큰 것으로 나타났다. 시료배합비율에 따른 비타민 C 함량차이는 크지 않았으나 당근의 함량이 많을수록 비타민 C의 함량이 높게 측정되었고, 압력증가에 따른 비타민 C 함량 증가가 뚜렷했다. 사과의 함량이 높을수록 산도도 높았고, 온도증가에 따른 산도의 증가도 뚜렷했다. 한외여과 결과, 전 시료에 걸쳐 우수한 청징효과를 나타내었고, 사과와 당근비가 3:1인 실험구에서 그 청징효과가 두드러졌으며, 또한 점도변화도 가장 컸다. 또한 공정최적화 결과 공정온도 및 ATP가 각각 $44.97^{\circ}C$, 113.57 kPa이고 사과의 혼합비율이 28.50%인 경우 $flux=0.216\;L/m^2.h$, soluble $solids=10.39^{\circ}Brix$, total sugar=71.32 mg/mL, vitamin C=315.18 mg%, acidity=7.78 mL, turbidity=0.017, viscosity=1.44 cp인 사과.당근 혼합과채주스를 제조할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Eun DW, Choi YH. 1991. Physical properties of the factors affecting the evaporation process of fruit juices. Korean J Food Sci Technol 23: 605-609
  2. Lee JH, Seog-Lee EJ. 1998. Studies on the quality changes of mixed fruit and vegetable juices as influenced by processing conditions during storage. Korean J Postharvest Sci Technol 5: 41-47
  3. Kang HA, Chang KS, Min YK, Choi YH. 1998. Value addition of jujube wine using microfiltration and ultrafiltraion. Korean J Food Sci Technol 30: 1146-1151
  4. Cassano A, Drioli E, Galaverna G, Marchelli R, Di Silvestro G, Cagnasso P. 2003. Clarification and concentration of citrus and carrot juices by integrated membrane processes. J Food Eng 57: 153-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00293-5
  5. Ortega-Rivas E. 1995. Review and advances in apple juice processing. In Food Process Design and Evaluation. Singh RK, ed. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, USA. p 21-47
  6. Zarate-Rodriguez E, Ortega-Rivas E, Barbosa-Canovas GV. 2001. Effect of membrane pore size on quality of ultrafiltrated apple juice. Int J Food Sci Technol 36: 663-667 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2001.00500.x
  7. Girard B, Fukumoto LR. 1999. Apple juice clarification using microfiltration and ultrafiltration polymeric membranes. Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 32: 290-298 https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1999.0554
  8. Youn KS, Hong JH, Bae DH, Kim SJ, Kim SD. 2004. Effective clarifying process of reconstituted apple juice using membrane filtration with filter-aid pretreatment. J Membrane Sci 228: 179-186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.10.006
  9. Cassano A, Jiao B, Drioli E. 2004. Production of concentrated kiwifruit juice by integrated membrane process. Food Res Int 37: 139-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2003.08.009
  10. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington DC
  11. SAS Institute, Inc. 2000. SAS User's Guide. version 6.12. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Cary, NC, USA
  12. Lee EM, Kang HA, Chang KS, Choi YH. 1998. Clarification of sandlance joetkal using ultrafiltration. Food Eng Prog 2: 96-101
  13. Zarate-Rodriguez E, Prtega-Rivas E, Barbosa-Canovas GV. 2001. Effect of membrane pore size on quality of ultrafiltered apple juice. Int J Food Sci Technol 36: 663-667 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2001.00500.x
  14. Ko EJ, Choi YH. 1999. Clarification of grape juice by ultrafiltration and membrane fouling characteristics. Food Eng Prog 3: 57-63
  15. Sohn KS, Seog EJ, Lee JH. 2006. Quality characteristics of clarified apple juices produced by various methods. Korean J Food Preserv 13: 138-143
  16. Sohn KS, Seog EJ, Lee JH. 2006. Quality changes of carrot juice as influenced by clarification methods. Food Eng Prog 10: 48-53
  17. Hutchings JB. 1999. Food colour and appearance. 2nd ed. An Aspen Publication, New York, NY, USA. p 19-21
  18. Floribeth V, Celsa L, Cooke RD. 1981. A study of the production of clarified banana juice using pectinolytic enzymes. Food Technol 16: 115-125
  19. Sin HN, Yusof S, Hamid NSA, Rahman RA. 2006. Optimization of hot water extraction for sapodilla juice using response surface methodology. J Food Eng 74: 352-358 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.005
  20. Joglekar AM, May AT. 1987. Product excellence through design of experiments. Cereal Foods World 32: 857-868