Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3-D Kinematic Analysis According to Open Stance Patterns During Forehand Stroke in Tennis

테니스 포핸드 스트로크 동안 오픈스탠스 조건에 따른 3차원 운동학적 분석

  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently among several tennis techniques forehand stroke has been greatly changed in the aspect of spin, grip and stance. The most fundamental factor among the three factors is the stance which consists of open, square and closed stance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between the segments of the body, the three dimensional anatomical angle according to open stance patterns during forehand stroke in tennis. For the movement analysis three dimensional cinematographical method(APAS) was used and for the calculation of the kinematic variables a self developed program was used with the LabVlEW 6.1 graphical programming(Johnson, 1999) program. By using Eular's equations the three dimensional anatomical Cardan angles of the joint and racket head angle were defined 1. In three dimensional maximum linear velocity of racket head the X axis showed $11.41{\pm}5.27m/s$ at impact, not the Y axis(horizontal direction) and the z axis(vertical direction) maximum linear velocity of racket head did not show at impact but after impact this will resulted influence upon hitting ball It could be suggest that Y axis velocity of racket head influence on ball direction and z axis velocity influence on ball spin after impact. the stance distance between right foot and left foot was mean $74.2{\pm}11.2m$. 2. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of shoulder joint showed most important role in forehand stroke. and is followed by wrist joints, in addition the movement of elbow joints showed least to the stroke. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of racket increased flexion/abduction angle until the impact. after impact, The angular displacement of racket changed motion direction as extension/adduction. 3. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk in flexion-extension showed extension all around the forehand stroke. The angular displacement of trunk in adduction-abduction showed abduction at the backswing top and adduction around impact. while there is no significant internal-external rotation 4. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of hip joint and knee joint increased extension angle after minimum of knee joint angle in the forehand stroke, The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of ankle joint showed plantar flexion, internal rotation and eversion in forehand stroke. it could be suggest that the plantar pressure of open stance during forehand stroke would be distributed more largely to the fore foot. and lateral side.

Keywords

References

  1. 강상학(2002). 테니스 탑스핀 포핸드 스트록의 운동학적 분석, 한국체육학회지,제41권 3호, p557-564
  2. 강영택(2000). 테니스포핸드시 밀어치기와 때려치기의 운동학적 분석, 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  3. 김신회(1995). 테니스 포핸드 드라이브시 라켓 속도에 대한 인체분절의 기여도. 서울대학교 석사학위논문
  4. 김인식(1984). 테니스 타격과 전략, 서울 : 금화출판사
  5. 서국웅(1989) 인체와 라켓 움직임의 생체역학적 분석, 부산대학교 체육 과학연구소
  6. 서국웅(1991). 인체와 라켓 움직임의 생체역학적 분석, 부산대학교 체육연구소논문집, 제7호. pp.65-95
  7. 서국웅(1992). 테니스와 볼 스핀. 테니스코리아 10월호
  8. 서정건(1986). 테니스 백핸드 드라이브 스트로크에 관한 연구. 경북대학교.
  9. 용석준(1990). 테니스 그라운드 스트로크 동작시 기능적 차이에 따른 근전도 비교분석, 성균관대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  10. 이중숙(1989). 테니스 포핸드 스트로크 동작의 운동역학적 분석-톱스핀, 플렛트, 슬라이스를 중심으로, 부산대학교 석사학위논문.
  11. 이중숙(2002) 준비동작의 형태 변화에 따른 신체 움직임의 운동역학적 분석, 한국운동역학회, 12(2) p 179-195. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2002.12.2.179
  12. 정철수.임규찬(1993). 테니스 포핸드 스트로크의 포워드 스윙에서 multisegment 스윙과 single unit 스윙의 라켓속도에 대한 기여도 비교에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 체육연구소.
  13. 황인승(1997). Kinematic analysis of sports skills using three dimensional cinematography(round house kick in Taekwondo). 미출판강의 교재, 연세대학교
  14. Abdel-Aziz, Y.I. & Karara, H.M. (1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object coordinates in close-range photogrammetry, Proceedings of the Symposium on Close-Range photogrammetry,(pp. 1-18). Falls Church, VA: American Society of Photo-grammetry.
  15. Baker,J.A, & Putnm,C,A(1979). Tennis racket and ball responses during impact under clamped and free standing condition, Resesarch Quartely, Vo1. 50, No. 2, 164-170.
  16. Brody,H.(1979). Physics of the Tennis Racket, American Journal of Physics, 46-47
  17. Elliott,B. & Kilderry,R.(1983). The art and science of tennis. New York Saunders. 58.
  18. Groppel,J.L.(1984) Tennis for advanced players and those who like to be, Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics
  19. Grood, E.S., & Suntay, W.J. (1983). A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 105, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138397
  20. Hatze,H.(1979). Forces and Duration of Impact and Grip Tightness During the Tennis Stroke. Medicine and science in Sports, 8. pp. 88-95.
  21. Johnson, G.W. (1999). LabVIEW graphical programming: Practial applications in instrumentation and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Knudson D., Blackwell J. (2000) Trunk muscle activation in open stance and square stance tennis forehands, J. sports Med. 21(5);321-324. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-3776
  23. Nigg, B.M. & Herzog, E. (1994). Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system.
  24. Plagenhoef,s.(1979). Tennis racket testing related to "tennis elbow." In J.L. Groppel(Ed.), Proceedings of the National Symposium on Racquet Sports. Champaign : University of Illinois, 291-312.
  25. Roetert, P., &Groppel, J.(2001). World-Class Tennis Technique. England: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
  26. Watanabe,I,M.(1979). "The effect of Grip Firmness on Ball velocity after Impact." Medicine and Science in Sports, Vo1. 11, No. 4, 359-361.