Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Rearfoot Motion Control through Marathon Shoes On and Off

마라톤화 착용 시 후족제어에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2005.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study using two-dimensional system of the analysis of image, when normal males in their twenties who have normal foot and step with heel first are walking and running, they who are wearing running shoes or barefoot are testing and comparing the exchange factors of heel control. There are following results of this test by verifying them with T-Test. 1) When they are running, there are two big different gap which is $6.05^{\circ}$ between barefoot and wearing the running shoes. The former is $174.79^{\circ}{\pm}6.31$ and the latter is $180.84^{\circ}{\pm}4.69$. But it is not statistically significant. The angle of first step with heel is $100.42^{\circ}{\pm}3.95$ with barefoot and $93.97^{\circ}{\pm}094$ with wearing the running shoes. In this case, it is statistically significant(p<.01) 2) When they are running, the angle of the Achilles' tendon has different gap which is $5.24^{\circ}$ between barefoot and wearing the running shoes. The former is $179.70^{\circ}{\pm}4.23$ and the latter is $184.94^{\circ}{\pm}4.09$. It is not statistically significant. The angle of minimal step with heel is $96.30^{\circ}{\pm}3.07$ with barefoot and $90.84^{\circ}{\pm}0.44$ with wearing the running shoes. In this case, it is statistically significant(p<.01). 3) In the angle of the Achilles' tendon and the angle of first step with heel, when they are walking, the angle of the Achilles' tendon has different gap which is $1.81^{\circ}$ between barefoot and wearing the running shoes. The former is $6.39^{\circ}{\pm}0.83$ and the latter is $8.20^{\circ}{\pm}1.85$. It is not statistically significant. The angle of first step with heel is $2.32^{\circ}{\pm}0.51$ with barefoot and $3.22^{\circ}{\pm}1.44$ with wearing the running shoes. It is not statistically significant. 4) In the angle of the take-off of Achilles' tendon, when they are walking, the angle of the take-off of Achilles' tendon has different gap which is $3.88^{\circ}$ between barefoot and wearing the running shoes. The former is $177.62^{\circ}{\pm}8.78$ and the latter is $173.74^{\circ}{\pm}16.31$. It is statistically significant(p<.05). Therefore, they are running, the angle of the take-off of Achilles' tendon is $178.37^{\circ}{\pm}19.28$ with barefoot and $171.26^{\circ}{\pm}12.18$ with wearing the running shoes. It is statistically significant(p<.05).

Keywords

References

  1. 강인혁(2001). 발목관절지지 방법이 발목관절 상해자의 보행 동작에 미치는 효과. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문, 7
  2. 곽창수(1993). 운동화 중저의 경도가 주행시 발바닥의 압력분포와 충격흡수에 미치는영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문, 2, 65, 70, 75
  3. 김석관(2000). 신발산업의 기술혁신 패턴과 전개방향. 과학기술정책연구원, P72.
  4. 김지연(2000). 경사도와 속도에 따른 트레드밀 보행의 운동역학적 분석. 이화여자대학교 박사 학위논문, 1-2, 8
  5. 김현수(2001). 달리기시 하지의 해부학적 상해 요인이 후족의 회내, 경골의 내측회전, 그리고 수직충격량에 미치는 형향. 연세대학교 석사 학위 논문, 1, 7
  6. 류지선, 이연종, 문동안(1996). 주행시 케쥬얼화의 후족움직임의 운동학적 분석. 한국체육학회지, 34, 609-615
  7. 부진후(2001). 러닝 시 충격에 의한 신체 각 부위의 가속도 전달 특성. 동아대학교 박사 학위 논문, 22
  8. 이연종, 류지선(1998). 주행 시 체중에 따른 운동화 중저 경도가 충격 흡수 및 후족 제어에 미치는 영향. 한국체육학회지, 37(3), 338-348
  9. 이영숙(1996). 육상선수의 운동상해에 관한 조사. 이화여자 대학교 석사 학위 논문 30-31
  10. 이우창(2001). 러닝화의 경도 차이가 후족 제어 및 충격력에 미치는 영향 분석. 동아대학교 석사 학위 논문, 1, 2, 4, 5, 32
  11. 이종훈, 김재필(1999) 비만 남자의 달리기 시 운동화 중저 경도가 후족제어에 미치는영향. 한국체육학회지, 38(4), 512-528
  12. 윤남식, 이경옥, 김지연(2001). 트레드밀 운동시 속도와 경사도에 따른 운동역학적 변인의 특성비교. 한국유산소운동과학회지, 5(1), 49-68.
  13. 정석길(2000). 노인의 발 유형 및 보행특성에 따른 신발디자인의 인간공학적 연구. 동아대학교 박사학위 논문, 76-79
  14. 정석길(2002.) 보행시 노인의 발목관절 동작에 관한 연구. 산업지인 연구지, 2권, 5-6
  15. 최규정, 권회자(2003). 보행용 전문 신발과 일반 운동화의 운동역학적 비교 분석. 한국운동역학회지, 12(2), 169
  16. 최순복(2001). 발의 불편감에 영향을 미치는 구두 형태 및 보행특성. 건국대학교 박사학위 논문, 1
  17. Alton, F., Baldey, L., Caplan, S., Morrissey, M. C.(1998). A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clinical Bionechanics, 13(6), 434-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00012-6
  18. Cavanagh, P. R., and Lafortune, M. A.,(1980). Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechnics, 13, 397-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0
  19. Clarke, T. E., Frederick, E. C., and Cooper, L. B.,(1982). The effect of shoe cushioning uper selected force and temporal parameters in running. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise, 14(2), 144
  20. Clarke, T. E., Frederick, E. C., and Hamill, C. L.,(1983). The effect of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise, 15(5), 376-381
  21. Clarke, T. E., Frederick, E. C., and Hamill, C. L.,(1984). The study of rearfoot movement in running.InSport Shoes and Playing Surfaces. E.C., FrederickIed. Champaign, Ill. : Human Kinetics Publishers, Icn., pp. 166-189.
  22. Elliott, B. C., & Blanksby, B. A.(1976). A cinematic graphic analysis of overground and treadmill running by males and females. Medicine And Science In Sports. 8(2), 84-87.
  23. Leuh, S. .,Frederick, E. C., Hawes, M. R., and Nigg, B. M.(1986). Influence of shoe construction on lower extemity kinematics and load during lateral movements in tennis. Int. J. Sport Biomech, 2(3), pp. 166-174.
  24. Mann, R. A.(1980). Biomechanics of Running, In Symposium on the foot and leg in running sports. R. P. Mack(ed), st. Louis. The C. V. Mosby Co; 1-29.
  25. Nigg, B. M (1996). Biomechanics of Running Shoe. Champaign, III : Human Kinetics.
  26. Scott, S. H., & winter, D. A.(1990). Internal forces at chronic running injury sites. Medicine and Science In Sports Exercise, 22(3), 357-369.
  27. Stacoff. A., and Kaekin, X(1983). Pronation and sportshoe design. In B. M. Nigg & B. A. Kerr(eds.), Biomechanical aspects of sport shoes and palying surface. 143-151. Calgary : University Printing.
  28. Subotnick, S.I,(1981). The flat foot. Phsician and Sports Medicine, 9, 85-91.