Journal of Animal Science and Technology

  • 제47권6호
  • /
  • Pages.975-984
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2672-0191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-0391(eISSN)
한국축산학회 (Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유기셀레늄 혼합제 급여가 비육말기 거세한우의 성장, 도체성적, 체내 셀레늄 분포 및 경제성에 미치는 영향

Effects of Organic Selenium Mix on the Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Tissue Selenium Distribution, and Economic Value in Finishing Hanwoo Steers

  • 김동균 (상지대학교 생명자원과학대학) ;
  • 정다운 (상지대학교 생명자원과학대학) ;
  • 성하균 (상지대학교 생명자원과학대학)
  • Kim, D.K. (College of Life Science and Natural Resources, Sang Ji University) ;
  • Jung, D.U. (College of Life Science and Natural Resources, Sang Ji University) ;
  • Sung, H.G. (College of Life Science and Natural Resources, Sang Ji University)
  • 발행 : 2005.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 유기태 셀레늄 급여가 한우의 생산성에 미치는 영향을 연구하기 위하여 유기태 셀레늄 혼합제의 첨가량을 달리하여 비육말기 거세한우에 급여하였을 때 나타나는 성장, 육질, 체내 셀레늄 분포 및 경제성을 분석 평가하고자 실시하였다. 총 45두의 비육후기 거세한우를 유기태 셀레늄 혼합제 급여 수준에 따라 15 두씩 3개의 시험구에 임의배치 하고 사료 건물 중 셀레늄 함량을 0.5ppm 수준이 되도록 유기셀레늄 혼합제를 급여한 시험구(0.5ppm OSM구), 1.0ppm 수준으로 처리한 시험구(1.0ppm OSM구) 및 대조구(혼합제 무첨가 관행사육구)로 나누어 4개월간 사양시험을 수행한 결과는 다음과 같다. 3개의 시험구간 총 증체량, 일일 증체량 및 사료 섭취량의 통계적 유의성은 없었다(p>0.05). 도체중량, 배최장근면적, 등지방두께, 육량지수, 육색지수, 지방색, 연도, 성숙도 등에서도 시험구간 유의적 차이가 인정되지 않았다(p>0.05). 그러나 상대적으로 유기태 셀레늄과 함께 미생물 제제가 많이 공급된 1.0ppm OSM 구에서 사료효율(사료요구량과 증체당 TDN), 도체등급 및 육질등급이 다른 시험구보다 좋은 성적을 나타냈다. 각 조직의 셀레늄은 유기태 셀레늄 급여에 의해 함량이 증가되었는데 0.5ppm OSM 구에서는 간과 우둔 그리고 1.0ppm OSM 구에서는 신장, 간, 등심 및 우둔의 셀레늄함량이 대조구보다 높았다(p<0.05). 조직 내 셀레늄 함량은 전반적으로 1.0ppm OSM 구에서 가장 높게 나타났으며, 각 조직간 셀레늄 함량은 신장, 간, 등심 그리고 우둔 순으로 높았다. 사양시험 종료시 도체 경락가를 기초로 경제성을 평가하였을 때 1.0ppm OSM 구가 대조구에 비하여 수익성이 5.5% 정도 높았다. 결론적으로, 유기셀레늄 혼합제의 급여와 급여수준은 사료섭취량, 증체량 그리고 도체특성에 큰 영향을 주지 않았지만 각 조직의 셀레늄 함량을 증가시켰다. 또한 유기셀레늄 혼합제를 1.0ppm 수준으로 사용하였을 때 육우 판매수입이 증가하였다.

This study fulfilled to investigate the feed efficiency, tissue selenium distribution, carcass characteristic and economic value in finishing Hanwoo steers fed organic selenium mix (OSM) which included seleno-yeast, rumen culture and other microbial supplements. Forty five finishing Hanwoo steers were tested for 4 months dividing to three feeding groups: OSM add as 0.5 ppm Se of DM feeds (0.5 ppm OSM), OSM enriched add as 1.0 ppm Se of DM feeds (1.0 ppm OSM) and basal diet without OSM (control). The total weight gains, the average daily gains and the feed intakes were not differ in treatments (p > 0.05). No differences (p > 0.05) were noted for hot carcass weight, loin eye area, backfat thickness, meat yield index, meat color, fat color, tenderness and maturity. However, the 1.0 ppm OSM showed better performances for feed requirement, TDN per gain, meat yield grade and meat quality grade compared to other groups. Tissue selenium distribution was increased by organic selenium feeding: higher Se concentration in liver and rump of 0.5 ppm OSM (p < 0.05), and kidney, liver, sirloin and rump of 1.0 ppm OSM (p < 0.05) than the tissues of control group. Generally, tissue selenium was the highest value in 1.0 ppm OSM and showed higher concentrate in order; kidney, liver, sirloin and rump. The income over feed cost was 1.06-fold higher in 1.0 ppm OSM than control group. In conclusion, organic selenium mix supplementation and its amounts were not influenced to feed intake, body gain and carcass characteristic but significantly increased tissue selenium. Therefore, these results suggest that finishing Hanwoo steer fed an enriched organic selenium mix with proper probiotics is able to produce “high-Se” beef as high bioavailable form as well as create a beneficial opportunity on Hanwoo farm.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aderman, G. 1985. Prediction of the energy of compound feeds. In recent advances in animal nutrition. Butterworths
  2. Allaway, W. H. 1973. Selenium in the food chain. Vet. 63(Soppl. 3):151-170
  3. Arthur, J. R., Mckenzie, R. C and Beckett. G. J. 2003. Selenium in the immune system. J. Nutr (Suppl): 1457s-1459s
  4. Brown, K. M. and Arthur, J. R. 2001. Selenium. seleoproteins and human health: a review. Public. Health Nutr. 4:593-599
  5. Banuelos, G. S. and Mayland, H. F. 2000. Absorption and distribution of selenium in animal consuming canola grown for selenium phytoremediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 46:322-328 https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1999.1909
  6. Clark, L. C, Combs, G. F., Turnbull, B. W.. Slate, E. H., Chalker, D. K., Chow, J., Davis, L. S., Glover, R. A., Gramham, E. G., Gross, E. G, Krongard, A., Lesher, J. L., Park, H. K., Sandes, B. B., Smith, C. L. and Taylor, J. R. 1996. Effect of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. JAMA (J. Am. Med. Assoc.) 276:1957-1962 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.276.24.1957
  7. Comb, G. F. Jr. and Comb, S. B. 1986. The role of selenium in nutrition. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida
  8. Finley, J. W., Davis, C. D. and Feng, Y. 2000. Selenium from high selenium broccoli protects rats from colon cancer. J. Nutr. 130: 2384-2389
  9. Gierus, M., Schwarz, F. J. and Kirchgessner, M. 2002. Selenium supplementation and selenium status of dairy cows fed diets based on grass, grass silage or maize silage. J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nitr. 86:74-82 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00359.x
  10. Gunter, S. A., Beck, P. A. and Phillips, J. M. 2003. Effects of supplementary selenium source on the performance and blood measurements in beef cows and their calves. J. Anim. Sci. 81: 856-864
  11. Hintze, K. J., Lardy, G. P. Marchello, M. J. and Finley J. W. 2001. Areas with high concentrations of selenium in the soil and forage produce beef with enhanced concentrations of seleniwn. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:1062-1067 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000699s
  12. Hintze, K. J., Lardy, G. P., Marchello, M. J. and Finley, J. W. 2002. Selenium accumulation in beef: Effect of dietary selenium and geographical area of animal origin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 3938-3942 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011200c
  13. Kim. Y. Y. and Mahan, D. C. 2001. Comparative effects of high dietary levels of organic and inorganic selenium on selenium toxicity of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 79:942-948
  14. Kimbrough, D. E. and Wakakuwa, J. R. 1989. Acid digestion for sediments, sludeges, soil, and solid wastes. Enviro.l Sci. Technol. 23:898 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00065a021
  15. Knowles, S. O., Grace, N. D., Wurms, K. and Lee, J. 1999. Significance of amount and form of dietary selenium on blood, milk, and casein selenium concentration on grazing cows. J. dairy Sci. 82:429-437 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75249-5
  16. Krehbiel, C. R., Rust, S. R. and Gilliland, S. E. 2003. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant dieet: Perfermance response and mode if action. J. Anim. Sci. 81(E. Suppl. 2):E120-E 132
  17. Lawler, T. L., Taylor, J. B., Finley, J. W. and Caton, J. S. 2004. Effect of supranutritional and organically bound selenium on performance, carcass characteristics, and selenium distribution in finishing beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1488-1493
  18. Martin, S. A. and Nisbet, D. J. 1992. Effect of direct-fed microbials on rumen microbial fermentation. J. dairy Sci. 75: 1736-1744 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77932-6
  19. Mir, Z. and Mir, P. S. 1994. Effect of the addition of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on growth and carcass quality of steers fed high-forage or high-grain diets on feed digestibility and in situ degradability. J. Anim. Sci. 72:537-545
  20. NRC. 1988. Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Washington, National Academy Press
  21. Ortman, K. and Pehrson, B. 1997. Selnenite and selenium yeast as feed supplements for dairy cows. J. Vet. Med. A 44:373-380 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1997.tb01121.x
  22. Rotruck, J. T., Pope, A. L., Ganther, H. E., Swanson, A. B., Hafman, D. G. and Hoekstra, W. G. 1973. Selenium; Biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179: 588-590 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4073.588
  23. SAS Institute, Inc. 1995. DAD. For Linear models: a guide to the ANOVA and GLM procedures. SAS. Inst. Inc., Cary, NC
  24. Schubert, A., Hoden, J. M. and Wolf, W. R. 1987. Selenium content of a core group of foods based on a critical evaluation of published analytical data. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 87:285-299
  25. Shi, B. and Spallholz, J. E. 1994. Selenium from beef is highly bioavailable as assessed by liver glutathione peroxidase activity (EC 1.11.1.9) and tissue selenium. Br. J. Nutr. 72:873-881 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19940092
  26. Steel, R. G. D. and Tome, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedure of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach 2nd ed MCGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York
  27. Van Ryssen, J. B. J., Deagen, J. T., Beilstein, M. A and Whanger, P. D. 1989. Comparative metabolism of organic and inorganic selenium by sheep. J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:1358-1363 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00089a033
  28. Wright, P. L. and Bell, M. C. 1966. Comparative metabolism of selenium and tellurium in sheep and swine. Am. J. Physiol. 211:6-10