DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of the Incomplete Lactation Records for Genetic Evaluations with Random Regression Test-Day Models (RRTDM) in Holstein Cattle

불완전 검정일 기록이 RRTDM을 이용한 홀스타인 젖소의 유전평가에 미치는 영향

  • Cho, J.H. (Dairy Cattle Improvement Center, N.A.C.F.) ;
  • Cho, K.H. (National Livestock Research Institute, R.D.A.) ;
  • Lee, K.J. (Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Animal Husbandry, Konkuk University)
  • 조주현 (농협중앙회 가축개량사업소 젖소개량부) ;
  • 조광현 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소) ;
  • 이광전 (건국대학교 동물생명과학부)
  • Published : 2005.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out the effects that daughters' incomplete lactation records affect sire's breeding values through genetic evaluation using RRTDM(random regression test-day model). First, we estimated genetic parameters and breeding values on sires having complete lactation records of daughter by RRTDM, second, we changed complete lactation records of specific sires into incomplete records by various methods. Third, the breeding values were compared between complete and incomplete records. Finally, this study aimed to find out the methods to minimize the estimation errors of young bulls' breeding values. Data used in this study were collected from the dairy herd improvement program, and a total of 97,562 records were composed of 10,929 first parity with both parents known, since 1999. Breeding values on the daughters from randomly chosen sires were calculated and compared with among 90 day, 150day, and 200 day's incomplete records. For milk yields, sire's ranks of breeding values used by complete lactation records were very different from sire's ranks of breeding values obtained by incomplete lactation records(Rank_90 cut, 150cut, 200 cut).The differences were also obtained between complete lactation records(per305_full) and incomplete lactation record (per_90 cut, 150cut, 200 cut) in breeding values regarding persistency. Especially, the differences between per_90 cut and per305_full were very large(from 1.8 kg to 145kg).

Keywords

References

  1. Dekkers, J. C. M., Jamrozik, J., ten Hag, J. H., Schaeffer, L. R. and Weersink, A. 1996. Genetic and economic evaluation of persistency in dairy cattle. Interbull. 12:97-102
  2. Gengler N., Tijani, A., Wiggans, G. R., Van Tassel, C. P. and Pilpot, J. C. 1999. Estimation of (co)variances od lactation yields for first lactation Holsteins in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 82:225
  3. Gengler, N., Tijani, A., Wiggans, G. R. and Misztal, I. 1999. Estimation of (co)variance function coefficients for Test-day yields with expectation-maximization restricted maximum likelihood algorithm. J. Dairy Sci. 82(Aug.) Online. Available: http://www.adsa.org/jbs
  4. Jakobsen, J. H., Madsen, P., Jensen, J., Pedersen, J., Christensen, L. G. and Sorensen, D. A. 2002. Genetic parameters for milk production and persistency for Danish Holsteins estimated in Random Regression models using REML. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1607-1616 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74231-8
  5. Jamrozik, J. and Schaeffer, L. R. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters for a Test-day model with Random Regressions for yield traits of first lactation Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80:762-770 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75996-4
  6. Jamrozik, J. and Schaeffer, L. R. 2000. Comparison of two computing algorithms for solving mixed model equations for multiple trait Random Regression test-day models. Livest. Prod. Sci. 67: 143-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00186-X
  7. Jamrozik, J., Kistemaker, G. J., Dekkers, J. C. M. and Schaeffer, L. R. 1997. Comparison of possible covariates for use in a Random Regression model for analyses of Test-day yields. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2550-2556 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76210-6
  8. Jamrozik, J., Jansen, G., Schaeffer, L. R. and Liu. Z. 1998. Analysis of persistency of lactation calculated from a Random Regression Test-day model. Interbull Bull. 16:43-47
  9. Jamrozik, J., Schaeffer, L. R. and Dekkers. J. C. M. 1997. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using Test-day yields and Random Regression model. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1217-1226 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76050-8
  10. Jamrozik, J., Schaeffer, L. R., Liu, Z. and Jansen. G. 1997. Multiple trait Random Regression Test- day model for production traits. Proc. Interbull Mtg., Vienna, Austria. Interbull Bull. 16:43-47
  11. Jamrozik, J. and Schaeer, L. R. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameter for a Test-day model with random regressions for production of first lactation Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80:762-770 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75996-4
  12. Jensen, J. 2001. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test-day model. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2803-2812 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74736-4
  13. Kettunen, A., Mantysaari, E. A., Stranden, I., Poso, J. and Lidauer, M. 1998. Estimation of genetic parameters for first lactation milk production using Random Regression models. Proc. 6ht World congr. Genet. Appl. Licest. Prod. 23:307-310
  14. Lee, K. J. and Kang, M. S. 1997. A Study on the Development of Age Adjustment Factors for Production Traits in Dairy Cattle. Korean J. Dairy Sci. 39(6):625-640
  15. Lee, K. J., Kang, M. S., Park, K. D., Choi, Y. S. and Ko, M. S. 1995. Development of 305-day adjustment factors for production traits in Holstein cattle. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 37(5):445-454
  16. Lee, J. K., Kim, J. B. and Joo, J. C. 1994. Study on data processing procedures for standardizing dairy lactation records. Korean J. Dairy Sci. 16(1): 83-91
  17. Liu, Z., Reinhardt, F. and Reents, R. 2000. Estimating Parameters of a Random Regression Test-day Model for first three lactation milk production traits using the covariance function approach. INTERBULL Bulletin No.25:74-80
  18. Meyer, K., Graser, H.-U. and Hammond, K. 1989. Estimates of genetic parameters for first lactation Test-day production of Austalian Black and White cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 21:177-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(89)90049-3
  19. Mosztal, I. 1999. REMLF90 Manual
  20. Misztal, I. 2001. BLUPPF90 family pakage. http:// hce.ads.uga.edu
  21. Ptak, E. and Schaeffer, L. R. 1993. Use of Test-day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 34:23-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(93)90033-E
  22. Reinhardt, F., Liu, Z., Benger, A., Dopp, L. and Reents, R. 2002. Impact of Application of a Random Regression Test-day Model to Production Trait Genetic Evaluations in Dairy Cattle. INTERBULL Bulletin No.29:103-107
  23. $SAS^\circledr$User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.0 Edition 1990. SAS Inst., Cary, NC
  24. Strabel, T. and Misztal, I. 1999. Genetic parameters for first and second lactation milk yeilds of Polish black and white cattle with Random Regression test-day model. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2805-2810 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75538-4
  25. Swalve, H. H. 2000. Theoretical basis and computational methods for dierent testday genetic evaluation methods. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1115-1124 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74977-0
  26. VanRaden, P. M. 1997. Lactation yields and accuracies computed from Test-day yield and (co)variances by best prediction. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 3015-3022 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76268-4
  27. Van Tessel, C. P., Wiggans, G. R. and Norman, H. D. 1999. Method R estimates of heritability for milk, fat, and protein yields of United tates dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2231-2237 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75470-6
  28. Vargas, B., Perez, E. and Van Arendonk, J. A. M. 1998. Analysis of Test-day yield data of Costa Rican dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81:255-263 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75574-2
  29. Wilmink, J. B. M. 1987. Adjustment of Test-day milk, fat, and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 16, 335-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(87)90003-0
  30. 이득환, 조주현, 한광진. 2003. 임의 회귀검정일 모형을 이용한 홀스타인 젖소의 1. 산차 산유형질 및 체세포 지수에 대한 유전모수. 한국동물자원과학회지 45(5):739-748
  31. 축산기술연구소. 2003. 2003년 상반기 젖소 유전능력 평가 보고서. 농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소

Cited by

  1. Models for Estimating Genetic Parameters of Milk Production Traits Using Random Regression Models in Korean Holstein Cattle vol.29, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0308