SIMULATION OF AUTOMOTIVE SEAT FOR REDUCING NECK INJURY IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT

  • CRO H. C. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chung Ju National University)
  • Published : 2005.04.01

Abstract

Neck injuries sustained during low speed rear impact are the most commonly sustained traffic injury. Therefore, the analysis of neck injury mechanisms and methods for mitigating and reducing neck injuries during low speed rear impact are a very important issue in the vehicle safety field. In order to find a method to absorb the shock that is transmitted to the occupant, the response of frontal and rear dummy due to the motion of the struck vehicle and the rotational angular displacements of dummies' necks during rear impact at 12km/h speed were investigated using a Working Model 2D. The results suggest that the shock absorption system should be equipped in the bottom of the seat of the vehicle to reduce shock and mitigate neck injury to the occupants.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheon, S. S., Choi, J. H. and Lee, D. G. (1995). Development of the composite bumper beam for passenger car. Composite Structures 32, 491-499 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(95)00078-X
  2. Eichberger, A., Geigl, B. C. Moser, A., Fachbach, B. and Steffan, H. (1996). Comparison of different car seats regarding head-neck kinematics of volunteers during rear end impact. Proceedings of 1996 International IRCDBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. 153-164
  3. Gillespie, T. D. (1992). Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc .. Warrendale
  4. Harris, C. M. and Crede, C. E. (1961). Shock and Vibration Handbook. McGraw-Hill Book Company. 2 and 3. New York
  5. Huang, S. C., Chu, J. Y. and Chang, C. H. (2000). Vehicle occupant response to rear-end impacts. Int. J. Vehicle Design 24, 2/3, 198-210 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2000.005182
  6. Lee, J. W., Yoon, K. H. and Park, G. J. (2000). A study on occupant neck injury in rear end collisions. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 8, 3, 130-138
  7. Maher, J. (2000). Report investigating the importance of head restraint positioning in reducing neck injury in rear impact. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32, 299-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00127-X
  8. Ono, K. and Kanno, M. (1996). Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 28, 4, 493-499 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(96)00019-X
  9. Park, K. H. and Han, M. H. (2000). Intelligent head-rest design for rear impact safety and driver's convenience. Seoul 2000 FISITA World Automotive Congress. F2000G363, Seoul, Korea
  10. Svensson, M. Y., Lovsund, P., Hlliand, Y. and Larsson, S. (1996). The influence of seat-back and head-restraint . properties on the head-neck motion during rearimpact. Accident Analysis and Prevention 28, 2, 221-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(96)00064-4
  11. Thomson, R. W. (1990). An investigation into low speed rear impacts of automobiles. Ph.D Dissertation, The University of British Columbia. Canada
  12. Thomson, R. W., Romilly, D. P., Navin, F. P. D. and Macnabb, M. J. (1993). Dynamic requirements of automobile seatbacks. SAE Paper No. 930349
  13. Watanabe, Y., Ichikawa, H., Kayama, O., Ono, K., Kaneoka, K. and Inami, S. (2000). Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32, 243-250 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00082-2
  14. Welcher, J. B. and Szabo, T. J. (2001). Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33,289-304 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00043-9