Genetic Analysis of Pod Dehiscence in Soybean

  • Kang Sung Taeg (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim Hyeun Kyeung (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Baek In Youl (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Chung Moung Gun (Samcheok National Univ., Dept. of Pharmacognosy Material Develop.) ;
  • Han Won Young (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Shin Doo Chull (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Lee Suk-Ha (School of Plant Science, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

Pod dehiscence (PD), defined as the opening of pods along both the dorsal and ventral sutures, causes the seed to shatter in the field before harvesting and results in loss of seed yields. However, breeding for resistance to PD is difficult due to the complicated genetic behavior and environmental interaction. The objective of the present research was to analyze the genetic behavior of PD for improving the breeding efficiency of resistance to PD in soybean. PD after oven-drying the sampled pod at $40^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours was the most reliable to predict the degree of PD tested in the field. Keunolkong, a dehiscent parent, was crossed with non-dehiscent parents, Sinpaldalkong and Iksan 10. Using their $F_1\;and\;F_2$ seeds, PD was measured after oven drying the pod at $40^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. The gene conferring PD behaved in different manners depending on the genetic populations. In the Keunolkong$\times$Sinpaldalkong population, PD seemed to be governed by single major recessive gene and minor genes, while several genes were probably involved in the resistance to pod dehiscence in the Keunolkong$\times$Iksan 10 population. Heritability for PD estimated in F2 population showed over $90\%$ in the two populations. High heritability of PD indicated that selection for resistance to PD should be effective in a breeding program. In addition, genetic mapping of quantitative locus (QTL) for PD in both populations may reveal that genes conferring PD are population-specific.

Keywords

References

  1. Bailey, M. A., M. A. R. Mian, T. E. Carter Jr., D A. Ashley, and H. R. Boerma. 1997. Pod dehiscence of soybean Identification of quantitative trait loci, J. Heredity 88 : 152-154 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023075
  2. Bhatia, V. S. and S. P Tiwari. 1994. Pod-wall thickness as a selection criterion for shattering resistance in soybean. Soybean Genet. Newsletter 21 : 98-100
  3. Carlson, J. B. and N. R. Lersten. 1987. Reproductive Morphology. p 95-134 In J. R. Wilcox (ed.) Soybeans: Improvement, production, and uses. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr 16. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI
  4. Caviness, C. E. 1963. A Physiological and genetic study of shattering in the soybean. Ph. D Dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia
  5. Caviness, C. E. 1969. Heritability of pod shattering and its association with some agronomic characters in soybeans. Crop Sci 9: 207-209 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900020029x
  6. Halvankar, G. B. and V. P. Patil, 1994. Inheritance and linkage studies in soybean. Indian J. of Genet. & Plant Breed. 54(3) : 216-224
  7. Helms, T. C. 1994. Greenhouse and field evaluation of pod dehiscence in soybean. Canadian J of Plant Sci 74(4). 699-701 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps94-126
  8. Monsi, M. 1942 Untersuchungen uber den Mechanismus der schleuder- bewegung der Sojabohnen-Hulse Jap. J Bot. 12 437-474
  9. Nagai, I. 1926. On the inheritance of the Soybean. Separate Mag. Noggo and Engel. I : nos. 1-2
  10. Piper, C. V and W J. Morse. 1923. The soybean. Mcgraw Hill. New York
  11. Quick, G R. 1974. A quantitative shatter index for soybeans. Experimental- Agriculture 10(2) . 149-158 https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447970000956X
  12. Ting, C. L. 1946. Genetical studies on the wild and cultivated soybean. J Amer Soc. Agron. 38: 381-393 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1946.00021962003800050001x
  13. Tiwari, S. P. and P. S Bhatnagar. 1991. Genetics of pod shattering in soybean. Soybean Genetics Newsletter 18 . 150-153
  14. Tiwan, S. P. and V. S. Bhatia. 1995. Characters of pod anatomy associated with resistance to pod-shattering in soybean. Annals of Botany 76(5) . 483-485 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1123
  15. Tsuchiya, T and K. Sunada. 1977. Shattering of pods in soya bean breeding I. Relations between degree of shattering and moisture content in pods Bull. Of Hokkaido Prefectural Agri. Experi. Stations. No 37: 17-24
  16. Tsuchiya, T. and K. Sunada 1978. Breeding studies on pod shattering in soya bean. II. Methods of testing for shattering and varietal differences. Bull. of Hokkaido Prefectural Agri. Experi. Stations Hokkaidorrtsu Nogyo Shikenjo Shuho, No. 39 : 19-26
  17. Tsuchiya, T. 1987. Physiological and genetic analysis of pod shattering in soybeans. JARQ Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly. No 21(3): 166-175