The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Drug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Investigated at One University Hospital in Seoul

서울지역 한 대학병원에서 조사된 폐결핵 약제 내성률 및 위험인자

  • Kim, Do Kyun (National Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Mi Ok (Department of Internal Medicine, JeJu Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hyung (Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical School) ;
  • Sohn, Jang Won (Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical School) ;
  • Yoon, Ho Joo (Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical School) ;
  • Shin, Dong Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical School) ;
  • Park, Sung Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical School)
  • 김도균 (국립의료원) ;
  • 김미옥 (제주대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김태형 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 손장원 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 윤호주 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 신동호 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 박성수 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실)
  • Received : 2004.10.28
  • Accepted : 2005.01.25
  • Published : 2005.03.30

Abstract

Background : The prevalence of tuberculosis is slowly decreasing in Korea. However, the drug-resistance of pulmonary tuberculosis is a major risk factor of treatment failure. Moreover, the National Surveillance System has recently been discontinued. Therefore, a continuous survey is necessary for the exact detection of the rate of drug resistance. We studied the recent 4-year drug resistance rate of tuberculosis at a single University hospital in Seoul. Materials and Methods : The study included 239 pulmonary tuberculosis patients performed with a tuberculosis culture and a drug-sensitivity test at Hanyang University Medical Center from March 1999 to March 2003. Results : Of the 239 patients included in the study during the 4-year period, 52 patients showed resistance to one or more anti-tuberculosis drug (21.8%). The rate of multi-drug resistance was 12.6%. The resistance rates to isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, streptomycin and pyrazinamide were 18.4%, 13.8%, 11.7%, 6.7% and 8.4%, respectively. Ninety patients had a history of previous anti-tuberculosis treatment, and the rates of the overall drug resistance and multi-drug resistance of these patients were 36.7% and 25.6%, respectively. The patients with drug-resistance showed a higher rate of a previous tuberculosis treatment history (63.5%) than the drug-sensitive group patients (30.5%). Conclusion : The rate of drug resistant tuberculosis is 21.8%, and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is 12.6%. The rate of drug resistance is higher in those previously treated for tuberculosis.

연구배경 : 한국에서 결핵환자의 유병률은 지속적으로 감소하고 있으나 약제에 대한 내성은 치료 실패의 중요한 요인이다. 국가적인 조사가 시행되지 않는 현 시점에서 지속적인 내성률 조사가 더욱 필요하다. 이에 저자들은 최근 4년간 서울 소재 한 대학병원에서 조사된 결핵균의 내성률 및 관련된 위험인자를 조사하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 1999년 3월부터 2003년 3월까지 한양대학교 의료원에서 치료 받은 결핵환자 중 결핵 배양 및 감수성 검사를 시행한 239명을 대상으로 하였다. 결 과 : 239명 중 한가지 이상의 약제에 내성을 보인 경우는 25명(21.8%)였고, 다제 내성 결핵은 30명(12.6%)이었다. INH, RFP, EMB, SM, PZA의 내성률은 각각 18.4%, 13.8%, 11.7%, 6.7%, 8.4%였다. 과거 결핵 치료력이 있는 환자는 90명이었으며 이들 중 약제 내성률은 36.7%, 다제 내성률은 25.6%였다. 약제 내성을 보인 환자의 63.5%는 과거 치료력이 있었으며 약제 감수성군의 과거 치료력은 30.5%였다. 결 론 : 서울에 소재한 한 대학병원에서 조사된 결핵 내성률은 21.8%, 다제 내성 결핵의 비율은 12.6%였다. 과거 결핵 치료력이 있는 경우에 약제 내성률이 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Report on the 7th tuberculosis prevalence survey in Korea. Ministry of health and welfare, Korean na. tional tuberculosis association. P.1-180, 1996
  2. Hong YP. Tuberculosis in Korea-yesterday, today and tomorrow. Tuberc Respir Dis 1997;44:1-10 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1997.44.1.1
  3. Hong YP, Kim SJ, Lew WJ, Lee EK, Han YC. The 7th nationwide tuberculosis prevalence survey in Korea, 1995. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:27-36
  4. Lew WJ. Tuberculosis situation in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis 1999;46:301-10 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1999.46.3.301
  5. The annual report 2003, Korean tuberculosis sur. veillance system. Korea center for disease control and prevention, The Korean national tuberculosis association
  6. Lew WJ. Tuberculosis surveillance system in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis 2000;48:298-307 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2000.48.3.298
  7. Canetti G, Fox W, Khomenko A, Mahler HT, Menon NK, Mitchison DA, et al. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull World Health Organ 1969;41:21-43
  8. Lew WJ. Several problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Tuberc Respir Dis 2000;48(S1):33-38 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2000.48.1.33
  9. Pablos-Mendez A, Raviglione MC, Laszlo A, Binkin N, Rieder HL, Bustreo F, et al. Global surveillance for anti-tuberculosis drug resistance, 1994-97, WHOInternational Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Working Group on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. N Engl J Med 1998;338 (23):1641-9
  10. Kim SJ, Bai GH, Hong YP. Drug-resistant tuber. culosis in Korea, 1994. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997; 1(4):302-8
  11. Dye C, Espinal MA, Watt CJ, Mbiaga C, Williams BG. Worldwide incidence of multidrug-resistant tu. berculosis. J Infect Dis 2002;185(8):1197-202 https://doi.org/10.1086/339818
  12. Kim SI, Park JM, Wie SH, Kim YR, Kang MW. The trend of antibiotics usage in Korea during 1981- 1998. Korean J Infect Dis 2000;32(6):436-447 https://doi.org/10.1080/003655400750045105
  13. Lee JH, Chang JH. Drug resistant tuberculosis in a tertiary referral teaching hospital of Korea. The Korean J Int Med 2001;16(3):173-179 https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.3.173
  14. Welsh CH. Drug resistant tuberculosis after gastr. ectomy. Double jeopardy? Chest 1991;99(1):245-7 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.1.245