만성 기침 환자에서 혈청 클라미디아 항체에 대한 ELISA와 microimmunofluorescence 검사의 비교

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays for Antibodies against Chlamydia Pneumoniae Compared with Microimmunofluorescence Test with Patients with Chronic Cough

  • 이희영 (강원대학교 의과대학 내과학교실, 강원대학교병원 임상의학연구소) ;
  • 김우진 (강원대학교 의과대학 내과학교실, 강원대학교병원 임상의학연구소)
  • Lee, Hui Young (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University and Clinical Research Institute, Kangwon National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Woo Jin (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University and Clinical Research Institute, Kangwon National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2005.01.26
  • 심사 : 2005.06.28
  • 발행 : 2005.07.30

초록

연구배경 : 클라미디아 폐렴균은 임상적으로 중요한 균으로 혈청검사가 진단에 중요하다. 현재 이용되는 micro-immunofluorescence법은 주관적이고 시간이 많이 소요되므로 좀더 객관적으로 진단할 수 있는 ELISA법을 이용하여 만성 기침을 주소로 내원한 환자들의 혈청을 대상으로 검사하고 표준방법과 결과를 비교하였다. 방 법 : 2003년 8월부터 2004년 7월까지 강원대학교병원을 방문한 35명의 성인 환자에서 얻은 혈청을 ELISA법과 micoimmunofluorescence법으로 시행하였다. 비인두 스왑에서 PCR을 시행하였다. 두 방법의 비교는 비모수 상관계수 분석(Spearman)을 하였다. 결 과 : ELISA 검사결과 IgG는 민감도 84.0%, 특이도 60.0%, IgA는 민감도 84.0%, 특이도60.0%, IgM은 민감도 40.0%, 특이도 96.7%의 결과를 보였다. PCR은 3명의 환자에서 양성이었다. 결 론 : ELISA법이 많은 환자들을 대상으로 하는 역학적 연구에서는 좀더 유용하게 이용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다. 임상적으로 적용되기 위해서는 좀더 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Background : Chlamydia pneumoniae is a clinically important pathogen, the diagnosis of such infection being based mainly on serology. Microimmunofluorescence (MIF) is the current standard diagnostic method, but is subjective and time-consuming, so the authors tested the serology of chronic cough patients using an EILSA method for the Chlamydial antibody, which is a more objective method, and compared the results with those of the standard method. Method : Thirty-five patients, who visited Kangwon National University Hospital between August 2003 and July 2004, were evaluated. A MIF and ELISA tests were used to determine C. pneumoniae antibody titers. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The Spearman rank correlation test was used for data analysis. Results : Sensitivities of ELISA for IgG, IgA and IgM, as judged by MIF, were 84.0, 84.0 and 40.0% and the specificities were 60.0, 60.0 and 96.7%, respectively. Three patients were Chlamydia PCR positive. Conclusion : ELISA can be a useful tool for studying the seroprevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae. However, further studies will be required prior to its clinical use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. File TM. Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 2003;362:1991-2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15021-0
  2. File TM, Tan JS, Plouffe JF.The role of atypical pathogens: Mycoplasma pneumonia, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila in respiratory infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1998;12:569-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70199-9
  3. Saikku P, Leinonen M, Mattila KJ, Ekman MR, Nieman MS, Makela PH, et al. Serological evidence of an association of a novel Chlamydia, TWAR, with chronic coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1988;2:983-6
  4. Falck G, Gnarpe J, Hansson LO, Svardsudd K, Gnarpe H. Comparison of individuals with and without specific IgA antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae. Chest 2002;122:1587-93 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.5.1587
  5. Kocazeybek B. Chronic Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection in lung cancer, a risk factor: a case-control study. J Med Microbiol 2003;52:721-6 https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.04845-0
  6. Dowell SF, Peeling RW, Boman J, Carlone GM, Fields BS, Guarner J, et al. Standardizing Chlamydia pneumoniae assays: recommendations from the centers for disease control and prevention and the laboratory centre for disease control. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:492-503 https://doi.org/10.1086/322632
  7. Numazaki K, Ikebe T, Chiba S. Detection of serum antibodies against by Chlamydia pneumoniae ELISA. FEMS Imunol Med Microbiol 1996;14:179-83 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00285.x
  8. Hermann C, Graf K, Groh A, Straube E, Hartung T. Comparison of eleven commercial tests for Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin G in asymptomatic healthy individuals. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:1603-9 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.5.1603-1609.2002
  9. Hermann C, Gueinzius K, OehmeA, von Aulock S, Straube E, Hartung T. Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for immunoglobulin G against Chlamydia pneumoniae to a microimmunofluoresence test for use with patients with respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:2476-9 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.6.2476-2479.2004
  10. Kishimoto T, Matsushima T, Morikawa T, Kawagoe K. Assay of specific anti-Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodes by ELISA method: 3. setting of serological criteria. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1999;73:457-66 https://doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.73.457
  11. Gaydos CA, Quin TC, Eiden JJ. Identification of Chlamydia pneumonia by DNA amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:796-800
  12. Caldwell HD, Kromhout J, Schachter J. Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun 1981;31:1161-76
  13. Wright SW, Edwards KM, decker MD, Grayston JT, Wang S. Prevalence of positive serology for acute Chlamydia pneumonia infection in emergency department patients with persistent cough. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:179-83 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03737.x
  14. Birkebaek NH, Jensen JS, Seefeldt T, Degn J, Huniche B, Andersen PL, et al. Chlamydia pneumonia infection in adults with chronic cough compared with healthy blood donors. Eur Respir J 2000;16:108-11 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16a19.x
  15. Miyashita N, Fukano H, Yoshida K, Niki Y, Matsushima T. Chlamydia pneumonia infection in adult patients with persistent cough. J Med Microbiol 2003;52:265-9 https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.04986-0
  16. Menendez R, Cordoba J, Cuadra P, Cremades MJ, Lopez-hontagas JL, Slavert M, et al. Value of the polymerase chain reaction assay in noninvasive respiratory samples for diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1868-73 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.6.9807070