Clinical Usefulness of D-dimer Test with Semiquantitative Latex Agglutination Method in Pulmonary Embolism

폐색전증에서 반정량적 Latex 응집법으로 시행한 D-dimer 검사의 유용성에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Dong Kyun (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Chun, Kang Il (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Yang-Ki (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Mok (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Ki Up (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Uh, Soo-taek (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Yong Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, Choon Sik (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, No Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Choi, Tae Youn (Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 김동균 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 천강일 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김양기 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 이영목 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김기업 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 어수택 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김용훈 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 박춘식 (순천향대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 박노진 (순천향대학교 의과대학 진단검사의학과 교실) ;
  • 최태윤 (순천향대학교 의과대학 진단검사의학과 교실)
  • Received : 2005.10.17
  • Accepted : 2005.10.27
  • Published : 2005.12.30

Abstract

Background : Diagnosing a pulmonary embolism is difficult because its presenting symptoms are nonspecific and there are limitations with all of the objective tests. The D-dimer is known to be a marker of the lysis of intravascular cross-linked fibrin as a result of the activation of the endogenous fibrinolytic pathways, and the D-dimer assay is these an objective method for diagnosing a pulmonary embolism. This study assessed the benefits of the D-dimer test for diagnosing a pulmonary embolism using semiquantitative latex agglutination. Methods : The latex agglutination results of 185 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The D-dimer test was performed at the time a pulmonary embolism was suspected. Ninety patients(group I) were diagnosis with PE through spiral chest CT or a chest CT angiogram, perfusion/ventilation scans, and/or pulmonary angiogram. Ninety-five patients (group II) were found not to have a pulmonary embolism through the above tests. Results : The male to female ratio and mean age in groups I and II was 37:55, and 57 years old to 50:45 and 52 years old, respectively. When the cut off value for a positive D-dimer assay was set to $500{\mu}g$, the sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and specificity was 86.7%, 61.4%, 79.3%, and 48.4%, respectively. Conclusion : The semiquantitative latex agglutination method in the D-dimer test has a lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than the well known ELISA test particularly for small emboli. Therefore, this test is not a suitable screening test for excluding a pulmonary embolism.

연구배경 : D-dimer는 혈장응고 및 섬유소분해계의 활성화 표지자로 알려져 있고 폐색전증은 비특이적인 임상양상과 진단이 어려워 비관혈적인 진단적 필요성이 대두되어 ELISA법에 의한 D-dimer 검사가 알려져 있으나 검사에 대한 소요시간이 길어 현실적으로 적용하기 어려운 단점이 있다. 검사 소요시간이 짧은 latex응집법에 의한 D-dimer 검사가 폐색전증의 선별검사에 유용한지에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 흉부 나선형 전산화 단층촬영, 폐관류 및 폐환기검사, 폐동맥조영술 등을 통해 진단된 폐색전증 환자 90명 (I군) 및 폐색전증을 상기의 방법으로 제외가 가능하였던 환자 95명 (II군)을 대상으로 반정량적 latex응집법에 따른 D-dimer 검사 (Stago D-Di, Diagnostica Stago, France)에 대한 후향적 조사를 시행하였다. 결 과: 환자의 성별 및 연령은 I군은 남:녀 = 37:55 및 57세였고 II군은 남:녀 = 50:45 및 52세 였다. D-dimer $500{\mu}g$ 이상을 양성으로 판정하였을때 민감도는 86.7%, 양성예측치 61.4%, 음성예측치 79.3%, 특이도 48.4%였고 확진이 가능하였던 66명과 음성으로 최종 판독되었던 95명에서 D-dimer $500{\mu}g$ 이상을 양성으로 판정하였을때 민감도는 93.9%, 양성예측치 55.9%, 음성예측치 92.0%, 특이도 48.4% 였다. 결 론: 반정량적 latex응집법에 의한 D-dimer 검사는 알려진 ELISA법에 의한 결과보다 민감도 및 음성예측치가 낮으며 혈전의 부하가 많은 경우에는 비교적 양성률이 높게 나타나나 혈전의 부하가 적은 경우 양성률이 낮게 나타날 수 있어 폐색전증 및 심부정맥 혈전증의 선별검사로 적합하지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Riedel M. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:309-19 https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2003.007955
  2. Donkers van Rossum AB. Diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2001;18:589-97 https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.01.00248601
  3. Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1998;339:93-104 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199807093390207
  4. Dunn KL, Wolf JP, Dorfman DM, Fitzpatrick P, Baker JL, Goldhaber SZ. Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1475-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02172-1
  5. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1227-35 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa023153
  6. Rathbun SW, Whitsett TL, Vesely SK, Raskob GE. Clinical utility of D-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and nondiagnostic lung scans or negative CT findings. Chest 2004;125:851-5 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.3.851
  7. Brown MD, Lau J, Nelson D, Kline JA. Turbidimetric D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a metaanalysis. Clin Chem 2003;49:1846-53 https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2003.022277
  8. Lennox AF, Nicolaides AN. Rapid D-dimer testing as an adjunct to clinical findings in exculding pulmonary embolism. Thorax 1999;54(Suppl 2):S33-6 https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.1.33
  9. Quinn DA, Fogel RB, Smith CD, Laposta M, Taylor Thompson B, Johnson SM, et al. D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1445-9 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.5.9808094
  10. Oger E, Leroyer C, Bressollette L, Nonent M, Moigne E, Bizais Y, et al. Evaluation of a new, rapid, and quantitative D-dimer test in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:65-70 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.1.9710058
  11. ten Wolde M, Kraaijenhagen RA, Prins MH, Buller HR. The clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1880-4 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.16.1880
  12. Kelly J, Rudd A, Lewis RR, Hunt BJ. Plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:747-56 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.7.747
  13. Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, et al. D-dimer for the exculsion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embollism. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:589-602 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-140-8-200404200-00005
  14. Mavromatis BH, Kessler CM. D-dimer testing: the role of the clinical laboratory in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:664-8 https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.54.9.664
  15. Schrecengost JE, LeCallo RD, Boyd JC, Moons KG, Gonias SL, Rose CE, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracies in outpatients and hospitalized patients of D-dimer testing for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Clin Chem 2003;49:1483-90 https://doi.org/10.1373/49.9.1483
  16. Lim CY, Kim HK, Choi KH, Lee SD, Koh YS, Kim WS, et al. Plasma D-dimer determination in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Tuberc Respir Dis 1996;43:69-74 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1996.43.1.69
  17. Park Q, Kim HK, Song KS, Park SJ. Comparison of several commercial D-dimer tests in the patients with thrombosis. Korean J Thromb Hemost 1998;5:147-54
  18. Fedullo PF, Tapson VF. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1247-56 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp035442
  19. Froehling DA, Elkin PL, Swensen SJ, Heit JA, Pankratz VS, Ryu JH. Sensitivity and specificity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism as defined by computed tomographic angiography. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:164-8
  20. Kang ES, Lim CM, Chi HS. Comparison of diagnostic value of D-dimer test by latex and ELISA methods in patients with high risk factors for pulmonary embolism. Korean J Thromb Hemost 1995;2:29-35