References
- Balfour A, O' Brien GR. Comparative study of anti rotational single tooth abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1995:73:36-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80270-7
- Boggan RS, Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW. Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999: 82: 436-440 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70030-2
- Matsushita Y, Kithoh M, Mizuta K, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. Two-dimentional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral ImplantoI1990:16:6-11
- Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001 :86:24-32 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116230
- Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear finite element contact analysis of preload dental implant components. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implant 1993:655-661
- Brunski JE, Hipp JE. In the forces on endosteal implant: A measurement system and biomechanical consideration. J Prosthet Dent 1984:51:82
- Sutter F, Webber HP, Sorensen J, Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: design and engineering. Int J Perodont Rest Dent 1993: 13 :409-431
- Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single end osseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:51-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80229-X
- Jemt T et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement. A 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991:6:29-36
- Levine RA. et al. A multicenter retrospective analysis of ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: Preliminary results at six or more months of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1997; 12:237-242
- Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997:8:290-298 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
- Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of internal conical interface two commercially available implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999:81: 159-166 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70243-X
- Norton MR. In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000:83:567-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70016-3
- Sutter F. et al. The new concept of ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants : Part 1. Engineering and design. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implant 1988;3:161-172
- Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Borjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants 1994:9: 179-183
- Henry PJ. Laney WR, Jemt T. et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11 : 450-455
- Krennmair G. Schmidinger S. Waldenberger O. Single-tooth replacement with frialit-2 system: A retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implanst 2002: 17:78-85
- Im TW. Cho IH, Lim JH, Lim HS. Fatigue strength of dental implants with different types of connection between fixture and abutment cylinder. J Korean Acad Stomatog. Function & Occlu. 2002:18:1-19
- Akca K, Cehreli MC, lplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant abutment complex of a reduced diameter morse taper implant: a nonlinear finite element stress analysis, Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003: 14:444-455 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00828.x
- Merz BR. Hunenbart S. Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000:15:519-526
- Kim NH. Chung CH. Son MK, Back DH. A study on the fit of the implant-abutmentscrew interface. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003:41: 503-518
- Chung KM, Chung CH, Jeong SM. Finite element analysis of implant prostheis according to platform width of fixture. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003:41:674-688
- Morimoto K. Kihara A. Takeshita F. Suetsugu T. An experimental study on the tissue compatibility of the titanium bladevent implant coated with HAP-alumina in the semi- functional state. J Oral Implantol 1987: 13: 387-401
- Haraldson T. Zarb GA. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Stand J Dent Rec 1988:96:243-252
- Lum LB. Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part one: Horizontal loading. J Oral Implantol 1992:18:343-348
- Holmes DC. Grigsby WR. Goel VK, Keller JC .. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:450-458
- Kirsch A. Neuendorff G. Ackermann KL, Nagel R, Durr W. Camlog connection: Requirements for a reliable implant prosthetic treament concept: tooth for tooth restoration. Quintessenz 1999: 50: 1-18
- Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989:4:241-247
- Rangert B, Krogh PHJ, Langer B, van Roekel NB. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995: 10: 326-334
- Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 1991: 17: 126-131
- Weinberg LA. Force distribution in splinted anterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral PathoI1957:10:484-494,1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(57)90007-5
- Weinberg LA. Force distribution in splinted posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957: 10: 1268-1276 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80025-5
- Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993:8:19-31
- Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant J Prosthodont 1993; 2:183-189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00405.x
- Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: Biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002:2:33
- Mollersten L, Lockowandt P, Linden LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: An in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1997: 78: 582-591 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70009-X
- Jansen VK, Conards G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997: 12: 527-540
- Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992: 7: 353-359
- Sones AD. Complication with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 62:581-585 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90084-X
- McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clinics of North America 1998:42: 71-89
- Cehreli MC, Akca K. Iplikcioglu H. Sahin S. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implantabutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design. Clin Oral Imp Res 2004: 15:459-463 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01023.x
- Binon PP. Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implants, standard abutments. and laboratory analogs. Int J Prosthodont 1995:8:162-178
- Binon PP. The evolution and evaluation of two interference-fit implant interfaces. Postgraduate Dent 1996: 3: 3-13
- Akca K. Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II : 3-D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2001: 10: 239-245