The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

A STUDY ON THE SOLUBILITY AND THE WATER SORPTION OF VARIOUS RESIN CEMENTS

수종의 레진 시멘트의 용해도와 수분흡착에 관한 연구

  • Hwang Yu-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim Ju-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim Heon-Song (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 황유진 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임주환 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임헌송 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2005.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. Among the physical properties of adhesion luting cement, the aspect that requires the most important factor is the degree of solubility and water sorption. Dissolution or an inadequate due to excessive water sorption inside the oral cavity compromises the while concurrently increasing the susceptibility to secondary dental caries. Susceptibility to dissolution and difficulty of removing remnant cement from the gingival sulcus have hindered the use of dental resin cement in the clinical practice, but the improved characteristics of newer generation resin cements have interest in and enabled resin cements to be widely used in adhesion of fixed prosthesis, such as laminate veneers and all-ceramic crowns. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the degrees of solubility and water sorption of a variety of resin cements widely used for clinical purposes with different curing methods. Material and methods. Self-curing resin cements, $Avanto^{(R)}$, $C&B^{TM}$ CEMENT and Superbond C&B cements comprised group 1, 2 and 3. The dual-curing resin cements $Panavian^{TM}$ F, $Calibra^{(R)}$ and $Variolink^{(R)}$ II were divided into groups 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The investigation was carried out using disc-shaped specimens as specified by ANSI/ADA Specification No. 27. The degree of water sorption, water solubility and lactic acid solubility of each test group was analyzed statistically leading to the following conclusion. Results. The degree of water sorption was shown to increase in the following order : group 6, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 3. There were significant differences between the water sorption of each group. Results of the degree of water solubility were shown to increase in the following order : group 6, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 3. Statistically significant differences were found between each group, with the exception of groups 1 and 3. Finally, the degree of lactic acid solubility was found to increase in the following order : group 6,5,4,2,3 and 1. Significant differences were found between each group. In general dual-curing resin cements displayed substantially lower values than self-curing resin cements with regard to water sorption, water solubility, and lactic acid solubility. Conclusions. From the results of this study, dual-curing resin cements show a significantly lower degree of water sorption and solubility than their self-curing counterparts. Clinically, when selecting resin cements, the product with a lower degree of water sorption and solubility are preferred. The results of this study indicate that the use-of dual-curing resin cements is preferable to self-curing cements.

Keywords

References

  1. Yap A, Lee CM. Water Sorption and Solubility of Resin Modified Polyalkenoate Cements. J Oral Rehabili 1997;24(4):310-4 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.d01-282.x
  2. Pluim L J, Arends J, Havinga P, Jongebloed W L, Stokroos I. Quantitative Cement Solubility Experiments in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1984;11(2):171-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00566.x
  3. Beech DR, Bandyopadhyay S. A New Laboratory Method for Evaluating the Relative Solubility and Erosion of Dental Cements. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10(1):57-63 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00100.x
  4. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Water Sorption Characteristics of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cements. Biomaterials 1997;18(4):343-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00124-X
  5. Kalachandra S. Influence of Fillers on the water sorption of Composites. Dent Materi 1989:5(4):283-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90077-8
  6. Lacefield WR, Reindl MC, Retief DH. Tensile Bond Strength of a Glass-Ionomer Cement. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53(2):194-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90108-8
  7. Osborne JW, Swartz ML, Goodacre CJ, Phillips RW, Gale EN. A Method for Assessing the Clinical Solubility and Disintegration of Luting Cements. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40(4):413-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90123-3
  8. Richter WA. Ueno H. Clinical Evaluation of Dental Cement Durability. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33(3):294-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80086-2
  9. Lowen JC, Granas DG. Clinical Evaluation of Cement Solubility. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40(4):453-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90131-2
  10. Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. The Influence of Water Absorption on the Development of Setting Shrinkage Stress in Traditional and Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cements. Dent Materi1995;11(3):186-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80016-6
  11. Hersek Ne, Canay S. In vivo Solubility of Three Types of Luting Cement. Quint Inter 1986;27(3):211-6
  12. American Dental Association. Reports of Councils and Bureaus Revised American National Standards Institute. American Dental Association Specification No. 27 for Resin-Based Filling Materials 1988:8-9
  13. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, McMillen K. Clelland N. Solubility and Sorption of Resin-Based Luting Cements. Operative Dentistry 2000;25:434-40
  14. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Caughman WF. The Curing Potential of Light-activated Composite Resin Luting Agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:512-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90291-4
  15. Braden M. Recent Advances in Dental Materials. Dental Update. 1977, 369
  16. Cardash HS, Baharav H, Pilo R, Amar R. The Effect of Porcelain Color on the Hardness of Luting Composite Resin Cement. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:620-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90293-W
  17. Calais JG, Soderholm KJ. Influence of Filler Type and Water Exposure on Flexural Strength of Experimental Composite Resins. J Dent Res 1998;67(5):836-40
  18. Brown RL, Rapson JE, Dickson G. Hardening Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion of Composite Resins. J Dent Res 1982;62(5):654-8
  19. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of New Crown and Fixed Partial Luting Agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(2):156-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90447-I
  20. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal Leakage of Cast Gold Crowns Luted with an Adhesive Resin Cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(1)11-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90039-D
  21. Tanakawa M, Atsuta M. In-vitro Solubility of Three Types of Resin and Conventional Luting Cements. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:285-91
  22. Setchell DJ. Teo CK, Khun AT. The Relative Solubilities of Four Mothern Glass-Ionomer Cements. J British Dent 1985;158(6):220-2 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805575
  23. Blackmann R. Barghi N. Duke E. Influence of Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization of Light-cured Resin Cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:295-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90199-M
  24. Hoffman N, Papsthart G, Hugo B. Comparison of Photo-activation Versus Chemical or Dual-curing of Resin-based Luting Cements. Regarding Flexural Strength, Modulus and Surface Hardness. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1022-8 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00809.x
  25. Jacobsen PH, Darr AH. Conversion of Dual Cure Luting Cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:43-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00209.x
  26. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of Dual-cured Cements under Composite Inlays J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:187-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80046-0
  27. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Sato W, Kawai K, Tori M. Weight Change of Various Light-Cured Restorative Materials after Immersion. Oper Dent 1998;23(3):132-7
  28. Warren K. An Investigation into the Microhardness of a Light-cured Composite when Cured through Varying Thickness of Porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:327-35 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb00016.x
  29. W Frank Caughman, Daniel C, N Chan, Fredrick A, Rueggeberg. Curing Potential of Dual-Polymerizable Resin Cements in Stimulated Clinical Situations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(1):101-6 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114842a
  30. Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture Susceptibility of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Materials. Quint Inter 1995;26(5):351-8
  31. Eliades G, Palaghias G. In Vitro Characterization of Visible Light-Cured Glass-Ionomer Liners. Dent Materi 1993;9(3):198-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90120-F
  32. Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. Variables Affecting the Fracture Toughness of Dental Composite. J Dent Res 1987;66(6):1140-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660060901