Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제21권3호
  • /
  • Pages.255-273
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A response spectrum method for seismic response analysis of structures under multi-support excitations

  • Li, Jian-Hua (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia) ;
  • Li, Jie (School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • 투고 : 2004.08.24
  • 심사 : 2005.07.17
  • 발행 : 2005.10.20
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Based on the random vibration theory, a response spectrum method is developed for seismic response analysis of linear, multi-degree-of-freedom structures under multi-support excitations is developed. Various response quantities, including the mean and variance of the peak response, the response mean frequency, are obtained from proposed combination rules in terms of the mean response spectrum. This method makes it possible to apply the response spectrum to the seismic reliability analysis of structures subjected to multi-support excitations. Considering that the tedious numerical integration is required to compute the spectral parameters and correlation coefficients in above combination rules, this paper further offers simplified procedures for their computation, which enhance dramatically the computational efficiency of the suggested method. The proposed procedure is demonstrated for tow numerical examples: (1) two-span continuous beam; (2) two-tower cabled-stayed bridge by using Monte Carlo simulation (MC). For this purpose, this paper also presents an approach to simulation of ground motions, which can take into account both mean and variation properties of response spectrum. Computed results based on the response spectrum method are in good agreement with Monte Carlo simulation results. And compared with the MSRS method, a well-developed multi-support response spectrum method, the proposed method has an incomparable computational efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. and Rubin, L.I. (1982), 'Suspension bridge response to multiple-support excitations', J. Eng. Mech., 108, 419-435
  2. Alkhaleefi, A.M. and Ali, A. (2002), 'An efficient multi-point support-motion random vibration analysis technique', Comput. Struct., 80, 1689-1697 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00161-X
  3. Allam, S.M. and Datta, T.K. (2000), 'Analysis of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion by response spectrum method', Eng. Struct., 22, 1367-1377 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00076-0
  4. Berrah, M. and Kausel, E. (1992), 'Response spectrum analysis of structures subjected to spatially varying motions', EESD, 21, 461-470
  5. Berrah, M. and Kausel, E. (1993), 'A modal combination rule for spatially varying seismic motions', EESD, 22, 791-800
  6. Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1975), Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
  7. Davenport, A.G. (1964), ''Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading', Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, 28, 187-196, London
  8. Der Kiureghian, A. (1980), 'Structural response to stationary excitation', J. Eng. Mech., 106, 1195-1213
  9. Der Kiureghian, A. and Neuenhofer, A. (1992), 'Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations', EESD, 21, 713-740
  10. Dumanoglu, A.A. and Severn, R.T. (1990), 'Stochastic response of suspension bridges to earthquake forces', EESD, 19, 133-152
  11. Dusseau, R.A. and Wen, Y.K. (1989), 'Seismic response of deck-type arch bridges', EESD, 18, 701-715
  12. Hao, H., Olivera, C.S. and Penzien, J. (1989), 'Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-l array data', Nucl. Eng. Design, 111, 293-310 https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(89)90241-0
  13. Hao, H. (1993), 'Arch response to correlated multiple excitations', EESD, 22, 389-404
  14. Hao, H. (1994), 'Ground-motion spatial variation effects on circular arch responses', J. Eng. Mech., 120(11), 2326-2341 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:11(2326)
  15. Harichandran, R.S. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1986), 'Stochastic variation of earthquake motion in space and time', J. Eng. Mech., 112(2), 154-174 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:2(154)
  16. Harichandran, R.S., Hawwari, A. and Sweidan, B.N. (1996), 'Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion', J. Struct. Eng., 122(5),476-484 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:5(476)
  17. Harichandran, R.S. (1999), Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
  18. Heredia-Zavoni, E. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1994), 'Seismic random-vibration analysis of multisupport-structural systems', J. Eng. Mech., 120(5), 1107-1128 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:5(1107)
  19. Hyun, C-H., Yun, C.-B. and Lee, D.-G. (1992), 'Nonstationary response analysis of suspension bridges for multiple support excitations', Probabilistic Engrg. Mech., 7, 27-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(92)90006-4
  20. Lin, J.H., Li, J.J., Zhang, W.S. and Williams, F.W (1997), 'Non-stationary random seismic responsed of multisupport structures in evolutionary inhomogeneous random fields', EESD, 26, 135-145
  21. Loh, C.H. and Yeh, Y.T. (1988), 'Spatial variation of stochastic modeling of seismic different ground motion', EESD, 16, 583-596
  22. Loh, C.H. and Ku, B.D. (1995), 'An efficient analysis of structural response for multiple-support seismic excitations', Eng. Struct., 17(1), 15-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)91037-2
  23. Nakmura, Y., Der Kiureghian, A. and Liu, D. (1993), 'Multiple-support response spectrum analysis of the Golden Gate Bridge', Report No. UCB/EERC-93/05, EERC, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1993
  24. Nazmy, A.S. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1992), 'Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges', EESD, 21, 1-20
  25. Nazmy, A.S. and Konidaris, E.G. (1994), 'Nonlinear seismic behavior of steel deck-type arch bridges', Proc. of Fifth U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, EERl, Oakland, CA, 367-376
  26. Price, T.E. and Eberhard, M.O. (1998), 'Effects of spatially varying ground motions on short bridges', J. Struct. Eng., 124(8), 948-955 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(948)
  27. Soyluk, K. and Dumanoglu, A.A. (2000), 'Comparison of asynchronous and stochastic dynamic response of a cable-stayed bridge', Eng. Struct., 22, 435-445 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00126-6
  28. Soyluk, K., Dumanoglu, A.A. and Tuna, M.E. (2004), 'Random vibration and deterministic analysis of cablestayed bridge to asynchronous ground motion', Struct. Eng. Mech., 18(2),231-246 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2004.18.2.231
  29. Tseng, W.S., Lilhanand, K. and Yang, M.S. (1993), 'Generation of multiple-station response-spectrum-andcoherency- compatible earthquake ground motions for engineering applications', SmiRT-12, K01/3, 13-18
  30. Vanmarcke, E.H. (1972), 'Properties of spectral moments with applications to random vibration', J. Eng. Mech., 98, 425-446
  31. Wang, J.J. and Fan, L.C. (1998), 'Modification of code response spectrum in long-period phase', Chinese J. of Civil Eng., 31(6), 49-55
  32. Zanardo, G., Hao, H. and Modena, C. (2002), 'Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion', EESD, 31, 1325-1345
  33. Zerva, A. (1990), 'Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions', EESD, 19, 819-832

피인용 문헌

  1. Information Theory for Generation of Accelerograms Associated with Shock Response Spectra vol.25, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00643.x
  2. Generation of critical and compatible seismic ground acceleration time histories for high-tech facilities vol.26, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.26.6.687
  3. A simplified multisupport response spectrum method vol.11, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0114-4
  4. Soil–structure interaction analysis of cable-stayed bridges for spatially varying ground motion components vol.35, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.003
  5. Comparison of model order reductions using Krylov and modal vectors for transient analysis under seismic loading vol.76, pp.5, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.5.643