Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

A Study for Natural Conservation Value Assessment of Developing Area - Case Study of Alpensia Resort -

개발 예정지역에서의 자연보전 가치 평가 - 대관령 알펜시아 리조트 조성 예정지역을 사례로 -

  • Published : 2005.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

While the recent lift of restrictions in greenbelt areas is expected to generate a number of development plans, there are efforts to create various development plans into spatial plans that consider the natural and ecological conditions of development sites. However, these development plans consider Degree of Green Naturality or Degree of Ecology only when designating areas for conservation within development sites. It is true that they don't fully reflect the value of green areas and wetlands as habitats and natural resources. Therefore, this study built an conservation value assessment model that is applicable to sites where development is planned in Korea by reviewing prior case examples md studies and applied the developed model to a case study area. The site where the conservation value assessment model was applied to is an area around Yongsan-ri and Suha-ri, Doam-myon, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwon province where quality natural resources are located in and wend the site. This is a site for the development of Alpensia Resort where a resort including facilities for the Winter Olympics is planned to be introduced. In order to assess the conservation value of the site for Alpensia Resort, a total of eight items including area, distribution of communities, habitation of species with conservation value, functions of habitats, connectivity of habitats, vegetation layers of forests, age of forests, and ratio of non-native plants were studied through literature review and field surveys. The assessment was made by dividing the site into 95 habitats that are perceived by aerial photographs and each habitat unit was assessed on the eight items in a 3-point scale. Each unit habitat assessed in a 3-point scale was segmented into primary, secondary or tertiary areas based on the conservation value. Habitats assessed as primary were designated as priority (absolute) conservation areas and those assessed as secondary and tertiary were set as secondary conservation areas and tertiary conservation areas, respectively. As a result, each area represented 26.9%, 20% and 3% of total site area. Based on this result, habitat management plans were developed to conserve primary conservation areas, improve secondary conservation areas and restore tertiary conservation areas. In addition, a development plan was developed to create habitats in areas where new habitats are requested in order to build an eco-network in the site and a plan to create eco-corridors was proposed. In developing a land use plan for the site, a development plan that considers conservation areas first should be set up based on the outcome of conservation value assessment. This can be linked to the development of an environment-friendly land use plan as well as easing the establishment of a green area and eco-network. This study will facilitate the implementation of the 'conservation before development' principle, which can prevent reckless development, by assessing conservation value in setting up development plans.

Keywords

References

  1. 강원도개발공사(2004) 대관령 알펜시아 리조트 조성사업에 따른 사전환경성검토서. p. 112
  2. 김귀곤(2002) 습지와 환경. 서울: 아카데미 서적. pp 173-196
  3. 김귀곤, 조동길(2004) 자연환경.생태복원학 원론. 서울: 아카데미서적
  4. 김영숙(2003) 보전성을 중심으로 한 토지적성 평가 개선 방법에 관한 연구. 서울시립대학교 석사학위논문
  5. 대한주택공사(2003a) 파주운정 2지구 택지개발예정지구 사전환경성 검토서
  6. 대한주택공사(2003b) 청주 성화 2지구 택지개발예정지구 사전환경성 검토서
  7. 대한주택공사(2004) 수원 호매실지구 택지개발 예정지구 사전환경성 검토서
  8. 류상림(2002) 도시지역의 생태자원 보전을 위한 평가모형 개발. 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문
  9. 박소현(2000) 자연자원의 평가를 중심으로 한 자연환경감사의 적용: 파주시 민통지역 및 비무장지대를 대상으로, 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문 p.107
  10. SH공사(2004) 서울 신내 2지구 택지개발 예정지구 사전환경성 검토서
  11. 한국토지공사(2003a) 청주 율량지구 택지개발 예정지구 사전 환경성 검토서
  12. 한국토지공사(2003b) 김포 양촌지구 택지개발 예정지구 사전 환경성 검토서
  13. 환경부(1998) 인공위성 영상자료와 GIS를 이용한 녹지자연도 등급판정 기법 개발. pp. 2-3
  14. 환경부(2004) 생태.자연도작성지침
  15. Adams, L. W. and L. E. Dove(1989) Wildlife Reserves and Corridors in the Urban Environment: a Guild to Ecological Landscppe Planning and Resource Conservation. Maryland: National Institute for Urban Wildlife
  16. Adams, L. W.(1994) Urban Wildlife Habitats: a Landscape Perspective. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press
  17. Anonymous(1997-98) Ecological Evaluation. Leeds Metropolitan University Faculty of Design & Built Environment School of Art, Architecture and Design 'BA(Hons) Landscape Architecture: Level 2'. p. 6
  18. City of Redmond(2000) City of Redmond Draft Wildlife Habitat Plan. Seattle: Adolfson Associates Inc
  19. Cook, E. A., and H. N. van Lier(1994) Landscape planning and ecological networks: an introduction, In E. A Cook and H. N. van Lier, eds., Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks. Amsterdam: ELSEVIER. pp, 1-11
  20. Dlugosch, K. M.(1998) Effects of English Ivy (Elsevier) Invasions on Forested Plant Communities in Pacific Northwest Urban Parks. Honors Thesis. University of Washington
  21. Eagles, P. F. J. (1984) The Planning and Management of Environmentally Sensitive Area. London and New York: Longman Inc. p. 40, 45-46
  22. England Field Unit Nature Conservation Agency (1990) Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey-a Technique for Environmental Audit. p. 96
  23. English Nature(1997) Nature Conservation Objectives in Shoreline Management Plan 'Suggested Approach'. p. 30
  24. Kelleher, G.(1999) Guidelines for Marine_Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. p. 107
  25. Kliji, F., ed. (1994) Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 12, 43, 56, 323
  26. London Ecology Unit.(1994) Policy, Criteria and Procedure for Identifying Nature Conservation Site in London Ecology Unit. p .9
  27. Sutherland, W. J. and D. A. Hill, eds,(1995) Managing Habitats for Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 25-28, 59-83
  28. Tilghman, N. G. (1987). Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 481-495 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(87)90061-2
  29. England Field Unit Nature Conservancy Council(1990) Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey: a Technique for Environmental Audit
  30. Frank, I. and D. Brownstone(1992) The Green Encyclopedia. New York: A Simon & Schuster Macmillan Company
  31. Ratcliff, D. A., ed.(1997) A Nature Conservation Review, Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 25-64
  32. Rochelle, J. A.(1998) Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications. Oregon: Conference Summary Statement. pp. 25-47
  33. Severine V. and P. Roland 2002. Map of ecological networks for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 58: 157-170 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00218-3
  34. Spellerberg, I. F.(1992) Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation Ecological Guidelines for Determining Priorities for Natural Conservation. Lndon: Champman & Hall
  35. Quinn, T. and R. Milner(1999) Great blue heron (Aedea herodiss). In E. M. Larsen and N. Nordstrom. eds., Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Species IV. Olympia: Wasington Department of Fish and Wildlife
  36. Usher, M. B.(1980) An assessment of conservation value within a large site of special scientific interest in North Yorkshire. Field Studies 5(2): 323-348