생태와환경 (Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment)

한국수생태학회 (The Korean Society of Limnology)
권호 표지

낙동강 중류지점에서의 동물플랑크톤 동태의 연간 변이 및 특성(낙동강)

Characteristics and Inter-annual Variability of Zooplankton Dynamics in the Middle Part of the River (Nakdong River)

  • 장광현 (에히메대학교 해양환경연구센터) ;
  • 주기재 (부산대학교 생물학과) ;
  • 김현우 (순천대학교 환경교육학과)
  • Chang, Kwang-Hyeon (Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University) ;
  • Joo, Gea-Jae (Department of Biology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Woo (Department of Environmental Education, Sunchon National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

낙동강 중류 지점에서 (왜관, 낙동강 하구언으로부터 175 km 상류 지점) 1998년 1월부터 2002년 12월까지 동물플랑크톤 군집 동태 및 환경요인 들과의 상관관계에 대해서 조사하였다. 조사지점에서의 동물플랑크톤의 계절별 변화와 연간 변화는 매우 뚜렷하였으며(ANOVA, p<0.01), 1998년과 2002년을 제외하고는 1999년부터 2001년까지 3년 동안 유사한 동물플랑크톤 양상을 나타내었다. 조사기간 동안 연 평균 윤충류의 개체수는 43${\pm}76 ind. $L^{-1}$ (평균${\pm}$ s.d., n = 118)이며, 요각류 (1.6${\pm}$4.8 ind. $L^{-1}$)와 지각류 (0.4${\pm}$1.2 ind. $L^{-1}$) 순으로 나타났다. 윤충류 군집내에서는 Brachionus spp. Polyarthra spp., Colurella spp., Keratella spp.와 Trichocerca spp. 등이 우점하였다. 이러한 종들은 전체 총 윤충류의 개체수에 대한 상대 풍부도의 80% 이상을 차지하였다. 조사지점 내 총 동물플랑크톤 개체수는 봄과 가을에 급격히 증가 하였으며, 겨울 동안에는 낮은 개체수를 유지하였다. 여름기간 동안, 동물플랑크톤 동태는 수문학적 요인에 의해 크게 영향을 받는 것으로 파악된다. 조사구획 내 동물플랑크톤의 동태는 내적요인 (동물플랑크톤의 먹이상태, 예: 식물플랑크톤 생체량) 보다는 외적 요인 (강의 수문학적 요인)들에 의해서 보다 더 큰 영향을 받는 것으로 사료된다.

The dynamics of zooplankton community and its relationship with environments were studied at the middle stretch (Waekwan, RK; river kilometer; above 175 km from the estuary dam) of large regulated river, Nakdong River from 1998 to 2002. There were distinct inter-annual variations and seasonal changes in total zooplankton abundance in the study site (ANOVA, p<0.01), displaying similar pattern in three years from 1999 to 2001 except 1998 and 2002. The annual average rotifers abundance during the study period was 43${\pm}76 ind. $L^{-1}$ (mean${\pm}$s.d., n = 118), followed by adult copepodids (1.6${\pm}$4.8 ind. $L^{-1}$), and small cladocerans (0.4${\pm}$1.2 ind. $L^{-1}$). Among the rotifers, Brachionus spp. Polyarthra spp., Colurella spp., Keratella spp.·, and Trichocerca spp. were the most common taxa. These species occupied more than 80% of the total rotifer abundance throughout the study period. Total zooplankton abundance rapidly increased in spring and fall and remained low throughout the winter. During summer, zooplankton dynamics seemed to be largely affected by hydrological parameters. Overall, rather the external factors (hydrological factors of the river) than internal factors (food condition for zooplankton such as phytoplankton biomass) appear to be responsible for changes in zooplankton dynamics in the middle stretch of the river.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Admiraal, W., L. Breebaart, G.M.J. Tubbing, B. van Zanten, E.D. de Ruijter van Steveninck and R. Bijkerk. 1994. Seasonal variation in composition and production of planktonic communities in the lower River Rhine. Freshwat. Biol. 32: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01144.x
  2. Allan, J.D. 1976. Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am. Nat. 110: 165-180 https://doi.org/10.1086/283056
  3. Bayly, I.A.E. 1992. 'The Non-marine Centropagidae (Copepoda: Calanoida) of the World.' Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World. No. 2. (SPB Academic Publishing: The Hague)
  4. Benfield, L.A. 1990. The composition and distribution of zooplankton in the lower Waikato River, New Zealand. M.S. thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. 120pp
  5. Bennett, W.N. and M.E. Boraas. 1989. A demographic profile of the fastest growing metazoan: a strain of Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotifera). Oikos 55: 365-369 https://doi.org/10.2307/3565596
  6. De Ruyter Van Steveninck, E.D., W. Admiraal, L. Breebaart, G.M.J. Tubbing and B. van Zanten. 1992. Plankton in the River Rhine: structural and functional changes observed during downstream transport. J. Plankton Res. 14: 1351-1368 https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/14.10.1351
  7. Gannon, J.E. and R.S. Stemberger. 1978. Zooplankton (especially crustaceans and rotifers) as indicators of water quality. Trans. Am. Micros. Soc. 97: 16-35 https://doi.org/10.2307/3225681
  8. Ha, K., E.A. Cho, H.W. Kim and G.J. Joo. 1999. Microcystis bloom formation in the lower Nakdong River, South Korea: importance of hydrodynamics and nutrient loading. Mar. Freshwater Res. 50: 89-94 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF97039
  9. Kim, H.W. 1999. Water quality, plankton community dynamics, and trophic regulation in the microbial food web by zooplankton in a hypertrophic river (Nakdong River, Korea). -Ph. D. dissertation, Pusan National University, Pusan, 230pp
  10. Kim, H.W. and G.J. Joo. 2000. The longitudinal distribution and community dynamics of zooplankton in a regulated large river: a case study of the Nakdong River (Korea). Hydrobiologia. 438: 171- 184 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004185216043
  11. Kim, H.W., K.H. Chang, K.S. Jeong and G.J. Joo. 2003. The spring metazooplankton dynamics in the river-reservoir hybrid system (Nakdong River, Korea): Its role in controlling the phytoplankton biomass. Korean J. Limnol. 36: 420-426
  12. Kim, H.W., K.H. Chang, W.-K. Shin, G.-H. La, K.- S. Jeong and G.J. Joo. 2004. Population dynamics of predator (Asplanchna spp.) and its impact on herbivorous rotifers community in three tributaries of the Nakdong River (S. Korea). Korean J. Limnol. 37: 385-393
  13. Kim, H.W., S.-J. Hwang and G.J. Joo. 1999. Grazing rates of rotifers and their contribution to community grazing in the Nakdong River. Korean J. Ecol. 22: 337-342
  14. Kim, H.W., S.-J. Hwang and G.J. Joo. 2000. Zooplankton grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton in a regulated large river (Nakdong River, Korea). J. Plankton Res. 22: 1559-1577 https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/22.8.1559
  15. Kim, H.W., S.-J. Hwang, K.H. Chang, M.H. Jang, G.J. Joo and N. Walz. 2002. Longitudinal difference in zooplankton grazing on phyto- and bacterioplankton in the Nakdong River (Korea). Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol. 87: 281-293 https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200205)87:2/3<281::AID-IROH281>3.0.CO;2-V
  16. Kobayashi, T., R.J. Shiel, P. Gibbs and P.I. Dixon. 1998. Freshwater zooplankton in the Hawkesbury -Nepean River: comparison of community structure with other rivers. Hydrobiologia 377: 133- 145 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003240511366
  17. Koste, W. 1978. Rotatoria. Die Radertiere Mitteleuropas. Ein Bestimmungswerk begrundet von Max Voigt, 2nd edn. (Borntrager: Stuttgart, Vol. 1, Textband 673p., Vol. 2. Textband 234p.)
  18. Koste, W. and R.J. Shiel. 1987. Rotifera from Australian inland waters II. Epiphanidae and Brachionidae (Rotifera: Monogononta). Invertebrate Taxonomy 1, 949-1021
  19. Naiman, R.J., J.A. Stanford and H. Decamps, 1991. The application of ecological knowledge to river management. In What large rivers for the future? Meeting of the 'Ministere de l'Environement', Orlecans, France, 55pp
  20. Peiler, B. and B. Berzins. 1989. On choice of substrate and habitat in brachionid rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 137-144 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048905
  21. Shiel, R.J. and K.F. Walker. 1984. Zooplankton of regulated and unregulated rivers: The Murray- Darling river system, Australia, in: Regulated rivers- In: A. Lillehammer and S.J. Saltveit (eds.), Univ. Oslo., pp. 263-270
  22. Smirnov, N.N. and B.V. Timms. 1983. A revision of the Australian Cladocera (Crustacea). Records of the Australian Museum Supplement 1: 1-132 https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0812-7387.1.1983.103
  23. Walz, N. 1995. Rotifer populations in plankton communities: Energetics and life history strategies. Experientia 51: 437-453 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143197
  24. Walz, N. and M. Welker. 1998. Plankton development in a rapidly flushed lake in the River Spree system (Neuendorfer See, Northeast Germany). J. Plankton. Res. 20: 2071-2087 https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/20.11.2071
  25. Wetzel, R.G. and G.E. Likens. 2000. Limnological Analyses, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag. New York. 429p