The Morphometric Analysis of the Extraforamen in the Lumbosacral Spine: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Study

  • Jang, Jee-Soo (Department of Neurosurgery, Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hospital)
  • 발행 : 2005.05.28

초록

Objective: The goal of this study is to establish the anatomical criteria of the normal and stenotic lumbosacral extraforaminal tunnel, and also to determine the effect of the pathologic intervertebral disc on the size of extraforaminal tunnel in the lumbosacral spine. Methods: MRI and CT scans were reviewed and classified into two groups: (1) 40 patients with normal discs at L5- S1 (Group 1) and (2) 43 patients that had undergone successful decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment at the lumbosacral region(Group 2). In these two groups, the following parameters were compared are compared: the distance between the disc margin and the ala (lumbosacral tunnel) on the axial MRI, and the posterior disc height at L5-S1 on the mid-sagittal MRI. Results: In the group 1, the mean distance of the lumbosacral tunnel on the axial MRI was $10.1{\pm}2.2mm$. The mean posterior disc height at L5-S1 was $7.4{\pm}1.7mm$ on the mid-sagittal MRI. In the group 2, the mean distance between the disc margin and the ala (costal process) was $1.6{\pm}1.3mm$ on the axial MRI. The average posterior disc height was $4.4{\pm}1.5mm$ on the mid-sagittal MRI. The posterior disc height and the size of the lumbosacral tunnel between the two groups were statistically different on the paired t-test (p<0.0001). However, the posterior disc height was not positively correlated with the size of the extraforaminal tunnel for group 2 (p=0.909). Conclusion: The extraforaminal stenosis was correlated to pathologic disc. However, the posterior disc height was not correlated to the size of the of the extraforaminal tunnel.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdullah AF, Ditto EW, Byrd EB, Williams R : Extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations. Clinical syndrome and special problems of diagnosis. J Neurosurg 41 : 229-234, 1974 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1974.41.2.0229
  2. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Okumura Y, Imura S : Microsurgical nerve root canal widening without fusion for lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal stenosis : technical notes and early results. Spinal Cord 34 : 644-650,1996 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.116
  3. Bose K, Balasubramaniam P : Nerve root canals of the lumbar spine. Spine 9 : 916-918, 1984
  4. Burton CV, Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Young-Hing K, Heithoff KB : Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Rel Res 157 : 191-199, 1981
  5. Gado M, Patel J, Hodges FJ III : Lateral disc herniation into the lower intervertebral foramen: differential diagnosis. AJNR 4 : 598-600, 1983
  6. Gioia G, Mandelli D, Capaccioni B, Randelli F, Tessari L : Surgical treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation : Identification of compressed root and discectomy by lateral approach. Spine 24 : 1952-1957, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199909150-00015
  7. Goderski JC, Erickson DL, Seljeskog EL : Extreme lateral disc herniation : diagnosis by computed tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 14 : 549-552, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198405000-00004
  8. Hasegawa T, An H, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH : Lumbar foraminal stenosis : Critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. J Bone Joint Surg 77A : 32-38, 1995
  9. Hashimoto M, Watanabe O, Hirano H : Extraforaminal stenosis in the lumbosacral spine : efficacy of MR imaging in the coronal plane. Acta Radiol 37 : 610-613, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3109/02841859609177684
  10. Jenis LG, An HS : Spinal update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 25 : 389-394, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022
  11. Kornberg M : Extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations : clinical syndrome and computed tomographic recognition. Spine 12 : 577-589, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198707000-00014
  12. Kunogi J, Hasue M : Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine 16 : 1312-1320, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012
  13. Maroon JC, Kopitnik TA, Schulhof LA, Schulhof LA, Abla A, Wiberger JE : Diagnosis and microsurgical approach to far-lateral disc herniation in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg 72 : 378-382, 1990 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1990.72.3.0378
  14. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Nojiri K, Ishikawa M, Toyama Y, Nishikawa Y : Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine : anatomical study and a report of four cases. Spine 27 : E169-E173, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200203150-00020
  15. Muller A, Reulen HJ : A paramedian tangential approach to lumbosacral extraforaminal disc herniations. Neurosurgery 43 : 854-861, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199810000-00077
  16. Nathan H, Weizenbluth M, Halperin N : The lumbosacral ligament (LSL) with special emphasis on the 'lumbosacral tunnel' and the entrapment of the fifth lumbar nerve. Int Orthop 6 : 197-202, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267730
  17. Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Medel FC : Evidence from cadavers suggestive of entrapment of fifth lumbar spinal nerves by lumbosacral ligaments. Spine 16 : 336-347, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103000-00014
  18. Park YK, Kim JH, Chung HS, Suh JK : Microsurgical midline approach for the decompression of extraforaminal stenosis in L5-S1. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 98 : 264-270, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.98.3.0264
  19. Stephens M, Evans J, O'Brien J : Lumbar intervertebral foramens : An in vitro study of their shape in relation to intervertebral disc pathology. Spine 16 : 525-529, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199105000-00007
  20. Transfeldt EE, Robertson D, Bradford DS : Ligaments of the lumbosacral spine and their role in possible extraforaminal spinal nerve entrapment and tethering. J Spinal Disord 6 : 507-512, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199306060-00006