References
- 권재술, 박학규, 김준태, 이영직, 이경호 (2000). 과학학습에서 불일치 상황에 대면한 학생들의 인지갈등 특성(수준 및 유형)과 반응 유형의 관계 분석. 한국교원대학교 부설 교과교육공동연구소, 연구보고. RR 98-VI-11
- 권재술, 이경호, 김연수 (2003). 인지갈등과 개념변화의 필요조건과 충분조건. 한국과학교육학회지 23, 574-591
- 김연수 (2002). 인지갈등 불안유형과 귀인의 동기 심리학적 요인에 따른 학생의 물리개념 변화 특성. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문
- 박종원 (2000) 학생의 과학적 설명가설의 생성과정 분석 . 과학적 가설의 정의와 특성을 중심으로 - 한국과학교육학회지, 20, 667-679
- 박종원 (2001). 학생의 과학적 설명가설의 생성과정 분석 . 대학생의 반응 분석을 중심으로- 한국과학교육학회지 21 , 609-621
- 박종원, 장병기, 윤혜경, 박승재 (1993). 중학생의 빛과 그림자에 대한 증거평가. 한국과학교육학회지, 13, 135-145
- 박지연, 이경호 (2004). 과학개념변화 연구에서 학생의 개념에 대한 이해: 오개념(misconception)에서 정신모형(metal model)까지. 한국과학교육학회지, 24, 621-637
- 신상우 (2004). 작용 . 반작용 과제에서 불일치 현상에 대면한 실업계 고등학생의 인지갈등 특성. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문
- 신상우, 김연수, 권재술 (2005). 작용 . 반작용 과제에서 불일치 현상에 대면한 실업계 고등학생의 인지갈등 특성. 한국과학교육학회지, 25, 편집중
- 인지갈등전략연구회 (2003). 선풍기를 이용하여 무풍지대를 빠져나올 수 있을까. 제 44차 한국과학교육학회 정기총회 및 하계학술대회 워크숍, 151-153
- 인지갈등전략연구회 (2004). 하늘을 나는 선풍기. 제 46차 한국과학교육학회 정기총회 및 하계학술대회 워크숍, 160-163
- 조용현, 김연수, 권재술 (2004). 작용 반작용 과제에서 고등학생의 인지갈등 불안유형에 따른 설명가설 형성의 특성(I). 한국과학교육학회지, 24, 596-611
- Berlyne, D. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: A point of contact between information theory and behavior theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64, 329-339 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041135
- Bruner, J. (1961). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
- Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance, Contemporary Educational Psychology. 27, 270-295 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
- Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1-40 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
- Clark, R. B. (1986a). The answer in obvious, isn't it? The Physics Teacher, 24, 38-39 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2341931
- Clark, R. B. (1986b). Response. The Physics Teacher, 24, 393
- Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovith, R. (1990). Applying the 'cognitive conflict' strategy for conceptual change: Some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science education, 74, 555-569 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740506
- Duit, R. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671-688 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
- Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, and treatment of test anxiety, Review of Educational Research. 58, 47-77 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
- Hewitt, P. (1988). Figuring physics. The Physics Teacher, 26(1), 57-58
- Hewitt, P. (2003). Conceptual physics. (9th Ed.). Addition-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
- Hong, E., & Karstensson, L. (2002). Antecedents of state test anxiety, Contemporary Educational Psychology. 27, 348-367 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1095
- Jargodzki, C., & Potter, F. (2001). Mad about physics: braintwisters, paradoxes, and curiosities. New York: John Willey
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tjosvold, D. (2000). Constructive controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman (Ed.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
- Kim, Y., & Bao, L. (2004a). Development of an instrument for evaluating anxiety caused by cognitive conflict. The Program of Physics Education Research Conference 2004, 18
- Kim, Y., & Bao, L. (2004b). Student anxiety types in cognitive conflict situations and conceptual change. AAPT Announcer, Vol. 34(2), pp. 133
- Kim, Y., Cho, Y., Shin, S., Kwon, J., & Bao, L. (2004). Anxiety Types in Cognitive Conflict at Action and Reaction Task, AAPT Announcer, 34(2), 132
- Kim, Y., & Kwon, J. (2004). Cognitive conflict and causal attributions to successful conceptual change in physics learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24, 687-708
- Lee, G., & Kwon, J. (2003). Toward an understanding and use of cognitive conflict in science instruction (I). Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23, 360-374
- Lee, G, H., Kwon, J, S., Park, S. S., Kim, J. W., Kwon, H. G., & Park, H. K. (2003). Development of an Instrument for Measuring Cognitive Conflict in Secondary-Level Science Classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 585-603 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
- Lee, G., & Kwon, J. (2004). How does cognitive conflict affect conceptual change process in high school physics classrooms? Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24, 1-16
- Liebert, R., & Morris, L. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data, Psychological Reports, 20, 975-978
- Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
- Marchant, E. C. (1974). Xenophon, Memorabilia(Leob). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
- Martinez, K., & Schulkins, M. (1986). The H.M.S. Newton III: an onboard-fan-powered sail cart. The Physics Teacher, 24(7), 393
- Merenluoto, K., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: towards systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 14, 519-534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.016
- McDermott, L. C; & The Physics Education Group at the University of Washington (1996). Physics by Inquiry (Vol. I . Il ), New York: Wiley
- McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: 'Physics Education Research - The Key to Student Learning'. The American Journal of Physics, 69, 1127-1137 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1389280
- McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I. Investigation of student understanding. The American Journal of Physics, 60, 994-1003 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003
- Movshovitz-Hadar, N., & Hadass, R. (1990). Preservice education of math teachers using paradoxes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 265-287 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305093
- Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt
- Rutledge, C. T. (1986). The obvious answer is correct! The Physics Teacher, 24(7), 393 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2342060
- Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II. Design of instructional strategies. The American Journal of Physics, 60, 1003-1013 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16979
- Sinatra, G. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
- Spielberger, C. (1972). Experimental approaches to test anxiety; Attention and the uses of information. In C. D. Spielberger(Ed.), Anxiety; Current trends in theory and research, (Vol. 2), N. Y: Academic press
- Spielberger, C., & Vagg, P. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process model. In C. Spielberger & P. Vagg (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis
- Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice(4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
- Wallingford (1986). Obvious?? The Physics Teacher, 24, 392