A Study of the Role of the Science Teacher in light of Michael Polanyi's Epistemology

  • Published : 2005.10.31

Abstract

Science education has been in a state of crisis for some time. To understand the science teacher's role, it is helpful to reconsider an aspect as fundamental as the nature of science. Since teaching cannot be separated from learning and knowledge, their very close dynamic processes need to prescribe the role of the teacher and student simultaneously. However, traditional views are limited because they tend to emphasize some particular selected aspect of learning and teaching. This paper investigates the epistemology of Michael Polanyi (1891 1976), which is often considered to transcend the confrontation between objectivity and subjectivity of knowledge. Polanyi reconceptualized science knowledge as 'personal knowledge' based on his own experience as a scientist and a thinker. In this study, I discuss 1) the nature of science in light of Polanyi's epistemology, 2) what this says about the meaning of science learning and teaching, 3) the potential of these ideas for the role of the science teacher.

Keywords

References

  1. Chuangtzu (2001). Chuangtzu. EulyuMunhwaSa. Translated by Kim Hakjoo. (Korean language publication)
  2. Kim Manhee (2003). Narrative Natures of Science Teaching Based on Polanyi's Epistemology. Ph.D thesis. Korea National University of Education. (Korean language publication)
  3. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2002). Improving the quality of Korean school education (II): a qualitative case study of good science teaching in a secondary school. Seoul: KICE. (Korean language publication)
  4. Lee Hongwoo (2000). Internalization of subject. Asian Education Research, 1(1), 249-271. Education Development for Asian Pacific. (Korean language publication)
  5. Lim Byungduk (2000). Educational epistemology and subject matter education. Research News on Subject Matter Education (2000. 8. 14), 1-7. Korea National University of Education. (Korean language publication)
  6. Matthews, M. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge
  7. Oakeshott, M. (1965). Learning and Teaching. Peters, R. S. (ed.). The Concept of Education, 156-176. London: R. K. P.
  8. Petrie, H. (1981). The Dilemma of Enquiry and Learning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  9. Polanyi, M. (1964). Science, Faith and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  10. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. New York: Harper and Row
  11. Polanyi, M. (1959). The Study of Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  12. Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
  13. Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minnesota University Press
  14. Yager, R. (1996). Science/Technology/Society: As Reform in Science Education. State University of New York
  15. Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and Learning about Science and Society. Cambridge University Press