Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

High School Students' Problem Solving Approaches on the Concept of Stoichiometry

  • Published : 2005.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined two students' problem solving approaches: the similarities and the differences in their problem solving approaches, and the general problem solving strategies (heuristics) the students employed were discussed. The two students represent differences not only in terms of grades earned, but also in terms of participation, motivation, attention to detail, and approaches to answering questions and problem solving. Three separate problems were selected for this study: A stoichiometry problem; a fruit salad problem; and a limiting reactant problem. Each student was asked individually on three separate occasions to contribute to this study. There are more similarities in the students' problem solving strategies than there are differences. Both students were able to correctly solve the stoichiometry and the fruit salad problems, and were unable to correctly solve the limiting reactant problem. They recognized that an algorithm could be used for both chemistry problems(a stoichiometry problem & a limiting reactant problem). Both students were unable to correctly solve the limiting reactant problem and to demonstrate a clear understanding of the Law of Conservation of Mass. Nor did they show an ability to apply it in solving the problem. However, there was a difference in each one's ability to extend what had been learned/practiced/quizzed in class, to a related but different problem situation.

Keywords

References

  1. Ambruso, M. D. (2003). Challenging students with experiments. Science Teacher, 70(1), 41-43
  2. Asirvatham, M. (2004). Enriching science through diversity. from http://www.colorado.edu/ftep/diversity/div12.html
  3. Carson-Dellosa Publishing (1994). Thematic units collection. Carson-Dellosa Publishing co, Inc. NC: Greensboro
  4. Gendell, J. (1987). The solution is not the problem. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 523-524 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed064p523
  5. Good, R. & Smith, M. (1987). How do we make students better problem solvers?. Science Teacher, 54(4), 31-36
  6. Herron, J. D. (1975). Piaget for chemists - explaining what 'good' students cannot understand. Journal of Chemical Education, 52(3), 146-150 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed052p146
  7. Kean, E., Middlecamp, C. H., & Scoot, D. L. (1988). Teaching students to use algorithms for solving generic and harder problems in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 65(11), 987-990 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed065p987
  8. Kim, Sung-Geun, Yeo, Sang-Ihn, & Woo, Kyu-Whan (1999). A study on students' questioning activity in science class. JKARE, 19(4), 560-569
  9. Lee, K. S. (1982). Fourth grader's heuristic problem solving behavior. Journal for Research in Math Education, 13(2), 110-123 https://doi.org/10.2307/748358
  10. McCalla, J. (2003). Problem solving with pathways. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(1), 92-98 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p92
  11. National Science Teachers Association (1985). Science-Technology-Society: Science education for the 1980's, in NSTA HANDBOOK 1985-86. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association
  12. Problem solving techniques and algorithms (2004). from www.heliosat3.de/e-learning
  13. Rief, F. & Larkin, J. H. (1991). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28(9), 733-760 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280904
  14. Tobias, S. (1990) 'They're not dumb, They're different: Stalking the second tier.' Research Corporation, Tucson, Arizona
  15. Wilson, E. O. (1992). The diversity of life. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press