Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine (동의생리병리학회지)

The Physiological Society of Korean Medicine and The Society of Pathology in Korean Medicine (대한동의생리학회·한의병리학회)
권호 표지

Study of Personality Traits in So-yang, So-eum and Tae-eum Using NEO-PI-R

NEO-PI-R을 이용한 소양인, 소음인 및 태음인의 성격 특성에 관한 연구

  • Cho Chang-Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho Yoon-Soong (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee Sang-Kwan (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University)
  • 조창현 (원광대학교 한의과대학 광주한방병원 내과학교실) ;
  • 조윤성 (원광대학교 한의과대학 광주한방병원 내과학교실) ;
  • 이상관 (원광대학교 한의과대학 광주한방병원 내과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the personality traits in three constitutional types, So-yang, So-eum and Tae-eum, using NEO-PI-R. The Questionnaire for QSCC II and NEO-PI-R Korean version were completed by 155 university students (108 males and 47 females), Analysis of difference among groups was conducted by ANOVA and followed by Scheffe test. Significant differences of personality among three constitutional types were revealed with respect to NEO-PI-R scales such as Extroversion and Openness in the big five factors and Anxiety, Angry ,Gregariousness, Assertiveness, Excitement Seeking, positive Emotion, Fantasy, Feeling, Action, Values, Modest and Deliberation in subtypesof the big five factors. The score of So-yang is significantly higher than that of so-eum in Extroversion, Openness, Angry, Gregariousness, Assertiveness, Excitement Seeking, Positive Emotion, Fantasy, Action and Values. The score of So-yang is significantly higher than that of Tae-eum in Extroversion, Openness, Gregariousness, Assertiveness, Excitement Seeking, Feeling, Action and Values. The score of So-eum is significantly higher than that of So-yang in Anxiety, Modest and Deliberation. The results Suggst that NEO-PI-R is helpful to determine constitution type, especially in the level of personality.

Keywords

References

  1. 박효인, 이건인, 사상체질분류검사와 성격특성검사의 비교분석을 통한 사상체질별 성격특성에 관한 연구. 사상체질의학회지 12(2):104-122, 2000.
  2. 김선호, 고병희, 송일병. 사상체질분류검사(QSCC)의 타당화 연구. 사상체질의학회지 5(1):67-80, 1993.
  3. 이정찬, 고병희, 송일병. 사상체질분류검사지 I (QSCC I)의 준거 타당화 연구. 사상체질의학회지 5(1):87-104, 1993.
  4. 김선호, 고병희, 송일병. 사상체질분류검사지(QSCC II)의 표준화 연구. 사상체질의학회지 8(1):187-246, 1996.
  5. 김영우, 이의주, 최선미, 김중화, 정성일, 이현민, 김종원. 사상체질진단을 위한 사상체질분류검사지 II (QSCC II)의 연구. 동의대학교 대학원 박사논문. 2004.
  6. 이상규, 곽창규, 이의주, 고병희, 송일병. 사상체질분류 검사지(QSCCII)의 Upgrade 연구. 사상체질학회지 15(1):39-49, 2003.
  7. Lee, S.K., Jeong, E.S., Sung, K.K. A Study of Personality Traits in Constitutional Types. 동의생리병리학회지 18(6):1892-1895,2004
  8. 이제마. 동의수세보원 여강출판사. 1992.
  9. 안창규, 채준호 NEO-PI-R의 한국 표준화를 위한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담과 심리치료. 9(1):443-473, 1997.
  10. 정유희. NEO-PI-R상에 나타난 범죄자의 성격특성. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. 2000.
  11. Botwin, M.D., Buss, D.M. Structure of Actreport Data: Is The Five-Factor Model of Personality Recaptured? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 988-1001, 1989.
  12. Golderg, L.R. Language and Individual Differences: The Search for Universals in Personality Lexicons. In L. Wheeler, Review of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 141-165, 1981.
  13. Goldberg, L.R. An Alternative 'Description of Personality: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(6):1216-1229, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
  14. Digman, J.M., Inouye, J. Futher Specification of The Robust Factors of Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 116-123, 1986.
  15. McCrea, R.R., Costa, P.T. Jr. Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism Scales with Measures of The Five-Factor Model of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences 6, 587-597, 1985.
  16. McCrea, R.R., Costa, P..T Jr. Validation of The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 81-90, 1987.
  17. Peabody, D., Goldberg, L.R. Some Determinants of Factor Structure from Personality-Trait Descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 552-567, 1989.
  18. 이경임. 한국인의 NEO-PI-R 요인구조와 부적응 집단 프로파일. 부산대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. 1995.
  19. Buss, A.H. Personality as Traits. American Psychologist. 44, 1378-1388, 1989.
  20. Mcadams, D.P. The Five-Factor Model in Personality: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Personality 60, 329-361, 1992.