Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on Correlations between Journal Impact Factor and Research Performance Evaluation Weight

학술지 영향계수와 연구업적 평가비중의 상관성 분석

  • 윤희윤 (대구대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김신영 (대림대학 문헌정보과)
  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Journal impact factor(JIF) of the ISI has many limitations and exceptions notwithstanding its great publicity. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics and limitations of IF, and to investigate and analyse research performance evaluation weight of academic faculty in Korea, and to make recommendations for the efficient evaluation criteria for Korean academic journal.

ISI의 영향계수는 그 범용성에도 불구하고 많은 한계와 가외성을 지니고 있다. 본 연구는 학술지 영향계수의 함의와 가외성을 살펴보고, 국내 대학에서 교수의 연구업적을 평가할 때 학술지에 부여한 점수기준(배점)과 가중치 반영실태를 조사.분석하여 어떤 문제점과 한계가 있는 지를 적시하고, 국내 학술지에 대한 적절한 평가기준을 제안함으로써 ISI 영향계수에 대한 연구업적 평가의 편향성을 극복하는 계기로 삼고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김신영, 이창수. 대학도서관 외국 학술지 평가모형 개발을 위한 평가지표 분석. "정보관리학회지", 21(2): 45-67.
  2. 배순자. 2002. 국내 학술연구자들의 국내학술지 의존도에 대한 계열 간 비교 조사연구. "한국문헌정보학회지", 32(2): 127-142.
  3. 윤희윤. 2003. 학술지의의 디지털 아킬레스 건 분석. "한국도서관.정보학회지", 34(4): 43-66.
  4. 한선화, 김태희, 김선호. 1999. SCI DB 분석을 통한 기초과학수준 평가체제 수립에 관한 연구. "정책연구", 99(12).
  5. 한국. 교육인적자원부. 2004. "교육통계연보". 중앙교육평가원 편.
  6. 한국. 교육인적자원부. 2004. "03년도 SCI 논문 종합분석결과 발표." 보도자료. 12월 10일.
  7. Allen, E. S. 1929. "Periodicals for mathematicans." Science, 70: 592-594. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.70.1825.592
  8. Amin, M., and M. Mabe. 2000. "Impact factor: use and abuse." Perspectives in Publishing, No.1. [cited 2005. 5. 10]. .
  9. Bensman, S. J. 1996. "The structure of the library market for scientific journals: the case of chemistry." Library Resources & Technical Services, 40(2): 145-170. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.40n2.145
  10. Brody, T., and S. Harnad. 2005. "Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact." [cited 2005. 5. 25]. .
  11. Brody, T., H. Stamerjohanns, S. Harnad, Y. Gingras, F. Vallieres, and C. Oppenheim. 2004. The effect of Open Access on Citation Impact. Presented at: National Policies on Open Access(OA) Provision for University Research Output: an International meeting, 19 February. Southampton University, Southampton UK. [cited 2005. 6. 10]. .
  12. Clausen, H., and I. Wormell. 2001. "A Bibliometric analysis of IOLIM[International Onlin Information Meeting] Conference. 1977-1999." Journal of Information Science, 27(3): 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150102700305
  13. Dalziel, C. F. 1937. "Evaluation of periodicals for electrical engineers." Library Quarterly, 7: 354-372. https://doi.org/10.1086/614068
  14. Garfield, E. 1972. "Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation." Science, 178: 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
  15. Garfield, E. 1998. "The use of journal impact factors and citation analysis in the evaluation of science." Presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Council of Biology Editors, 4 May - 17 April, Salt Lake City, UT. [cited 2005. 4. 25]. .
  16. Garfield, E. 1999. "Journal impact factor: a brief review." Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8): 979-80.
  17. Gross, P. L. K., and A. O. Woodford. 1931. "Serial literature used by American geologists." Science, 73: 660-664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.73.1903.660
  18. Hackh, I. 1936. "The periodicals useful in the dental library." Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 25: 109-112.
  19. Harter, S. P., and T. E. Nisonger. 1997. "ISI's impact factors misnomer: a proposed new measure to assess journal impact." Journal of the American Society For Information Science, 48(12): 1147-1148.
  20. Hofbauer. R. ed. 2002. $Euro-Factor^{TM}$ : The New European scientific currency. Vienna : VICER Publishing. [cited 2005. 6. 25]. .
  21. Huth, E. J. 2001. "Author, editors, policy makers, and the impact factor." Croatian Medical Journal, 42(1): 14-17.
  22. Ingwersen, P. 1998. "The Calculation of web impact factor." Journal of Documentaion, 54(2): 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007167
  23. Kurtz, M. J. 2004. "Restrictive access policies cut readership of electronic research journal articles by a factor of two." National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: an International meeting. [cited 2005. 4. 25]. .
  24. Line, M. 1976. "On the irrelevance of citation analyses to practical librarianship." EURIM II: AEuropean Conference on the Application of Research In nformation Services in Libraries. London : Aslib, 51-53.
  25. McNeely, J. K., and C. D. Crosno. 1930. "Periodicals for electrical engineers." Science, 72: 81-84. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.72.1856.81
  26. Merton, R. K. 1968. "The Matthew effect in science." Science, 159: 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
  27. Nisonger, T. E. 1999. "JASIS and library and information science journal ranking: a review and analysis of the lase half-century." Journal of the American society for Information Science, 50(11): 1004-1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:11<1004::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-K
  28. Nisonger, T. E. 2004. "The Benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries." The Serials Librarian, 47(1/2): 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v47n01_04