DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usability Evalulation of Button Selection Aids for PDAs

PDA 화면 내 버튼 선택을 위한 입력지원방식의 사용성 평가

  • 박용성 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 한성호 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 문정태 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 전석희 (포항공과대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
  • Published : 2005.08.31

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to design input methods for assisting button selection tasks on a PDA screen. Familiar methods in the existing computing environments were investigated to develop aiding methods. Factors manipulated in the experiment included aiding method, button size, and users' prior experience with PDAs. A total of sixteen participants examined the usability of button selection tasks. Two types of button selection tasks were used as experimental tasks; one was selecting a target button, and the other was selecting multiple target buttons consecutively. The results showed that the aiding method and the button size had significant effects on the subjective satisfaction as well as the performance. In addition, users' prior experience with PDAs affected the performance significantly. The interaction between the aiding method and the button size was found to have significant effects on the performance. However, the interaction effect between the button size and the PDA experience was significant on the task performance time only for the multiple button selection tasks. Design considerations were proposed based on the experimental results. These can be applied to the PDA interaction design to make the PDAs more usable.

Keywords

References

  1. Aoki, P. M., Hurst, A. and Woodruff, A., 'Tap Tips: Lightweight discovery of touchscreen targets', Proceedings of the ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI 2001. Extended Abstracts (pp. 237-238), Seattle, WA, Apr. 2001
  2. Albert, A. E., 'The effect of graphic input devices on performance in a cursor positioning task', Proceedings of the human factors society 26th annual meeting (pp. 54-58), Santa Monica, CA. 1982
  3. Albinsson, P. and Zhai, S., 'High precision touch screen interaction.' Proceedings of the ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI 2003 (pp. 105-112), New York. 2003
  4. Fitts, P. M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391, 1954 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053732
  5. Greenstein, J. S., Pointing devices. In Martin. G. Healander, Thomas K. Landauer, and Prasad V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997
  6. Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A., Nonparametric statistical methods, Wiley: New York, 1973
  7. Mankoff, J. and Abowd, G. D., Cirrin: A word-level unistroke keyboard for pen input. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp 213-214), New York, 1998
  8. Marcus, A. and Chen, E., Designing the PDA of the future. Interactions, 9(1), pp. 34-44, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1145/503355.503356
  9. Matsushita, N., Ayatsuka, Y. and Rekimoto, J., Dual Touch: A two-handed interface for pen-based PDAs. CHI Letters, 2(2), pp. 211-212, 2000
  10. McGee, D., Cohen, P. R. and Oviatt, S. L., Confirmation in multimodal systems. Proceedings of Coling-ACL '98. Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics. 1998
  11. Neggers, S. F. W. and Bekkering, H.,Gaze anchoring to a pointing target is present during the entire pointing movement and is driven by a non-visual signal. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86(2), pp. 961-970, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.961
  12. Nielson, J. and Levy, J., Measuring usability: Preference vs. Performance. Communications of The ACM, 37(4), pp. 66-75, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1145/175276.175282
  13. Ren, X. and Moriya, S., Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: A study of Pen-based interaction for selection task. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(3), pp. 384-416, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1145/355324.355328
  14. Sanders, M. S. and McCormick, E. J., Human factors in engineering and design. McGraw-Hill: Singapore, 1992