Advanced Design of Birdcage RF Coil for Various Absorption Regions at 3T MRI System

  • Lee, Jung-Woo (Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Choe, Bo-Young (Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Choi, Chi-Bong (Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Huh, Soon-Nyoung (Dept. of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2005.06.20

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to design and build an optimized birdcage resonator configuration with a low pass filter, which would facilitate the acquisition of high-resolution 3D-image of small animals at 3T MRI system. Methods and Materials: The birdcage resonator with 12-element structures was built, in order to ensure B1 homogeneity over the image volume and maximum filling factor, and hence to maximize the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and resolution of the 3-dimensional images. The diameter and length of each element of a birdcage resonator were as follows: (1) diameter 13 cm, length 22 cm, (2) diameter 15 cm, length 22 cm, (3) diameter 17 cm, length 25 cm. Spin echo pulse sequence and fast spin echo pulse sequence were employed in obtaining MR images. The quality of the manufactured birdcage resonators wes evaluated on the basis of the return loss following matching and tuning process. Results: The experimental MR image of phantoms by the various manufactured birdcage resonators were obtained to compare the SNR in accordance with the size of objects. The size of an object to that of coil was identified by parameters that were estimated from the image of a phantom. First, the diameter of the birdcage resonator was 15cm, and the ratio of the tangerine to the birdcage resonator accounted for approximately 27%. The Q factor was 53.2 and the SNR was 150.7. Second, at the same birdcage resonator, the ratio of the orange was approximately 53%. The SNR and the Q parameter was 212.8 and 91.2, respectively. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that if birdcage resonators have the same forms, SNR could be different depending on the size of an object, especially when the size of an object to that of coil is approximately 40~80%, the former is bigger than the latter. Therefore, when the size of an object to be observed is smaller than that of coil, the coil should be manufactured in accordance with the size of an object in order to obtain much more excellent images.

Keywords