Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute (콘크리트학회논문집)

Korea Concrete Institute (한국콘크리트학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Evaluation of 3 Story OMRCF Based on Scaled Model Testing

축소모델실험에 의한 철근콘크리트 3층 보통모멘트골조의 구조 성능 평가

  • Han Sang-Whan (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kwon Gun-Up (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Published : 2005.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

ACI 318 (1999) defines three types of moment frames: Ordinary Moment Resisting Concrete Frame (OMRCF), Intermediate Moment Resisting Concrete Frame (IMRCF), and Special Moment Resisting Concrete Frame (SMRCF). OMRCF is the most popular type of moment frame in mild seismic zones that requires the least detail and design requirements. This study focuses on the seismic performance of Ordinary Moment Resisting Concrete Frames (OMRCF) designed only for gravity loads. For this purpose a 3-story OMRCF was designed in compliance with the minimum design requirements in ACI 318 (1999). An one third 3 story specimen was made and tested. For scaled model, the similitude law of true replica was applied. The specimen was loaded with quasi-static reversed cyclic lateral loading. The overall behavior of OMRCF is quite stable without abrupt strength degradation. It is found that tested frame has the base shear strength larger than the design base shear for seismic zone 1, 2A and 2B calculated using UBC 1997.

ACI 318(1999) 규준에서는 모멘트골조를 특수모멘트골조, 중간모멘트골조, 보통모멘트골조의 3가지로 구분하고 있다. 이중 중 약 지진 지역에서는 대부분의 구조물이 보통모멘트골조로 설계되고 있다. 이러한 보통모멘트골조는 현행 규준에서 가장 엄격하지 않은 상세와 요구사항이 적용되는 골조 형식이다 본 연구는 중력하중으로만 설계되고 ACI 318(1999) 기준의 보통모멘트골조의 상세만을 가지는 3층의 사무소 건물의 내진 성능 평가를 그 목표로 한다 실험적 연구를 위하여 1/3 축소 모델을 제작하여 준정적 실험을 실시하였다. 보통모멘트골조의 전체적인 거동은 갑작스러운 강도의 저감 없이 안정적인 거동을 하였다 실험결과, 중력하중으로만 설계된 3층의 사무소건물은 UBC 1997 규준의 지진 지역 1, 2A, 2B에서의 요구하는 설계 밑면전단력보다 더 큰 횡력 저항 능력을 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Concrete Institute, Building code requirements for reinforced concrete, ACI 318-95,99, Detroit, Michigan, 1995, 1999
  2. Applied Technology Council, ATC 40: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Conaete Buildings Vol.1 & Vol.2, California Seismic Safety Commission No. SSC 96-01, Nov. 1996
  3. Computers and Structures Inc., SAP2000, Berkeley, California, 1997
  4. CSI Berkeley, SAP2000 Concrete Design Manual, Compute & Structures, Inc., 2000, pp.17-41
  5. International Conference on Building Officials, Uniform Building Code(UBC), Whittier, California 1997, pp.2-9-2-20
  6. Building Seismic Safety Council, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development if Seismic Regulation for New Buildings, Part 1 & 2, Provisions and Commentary, FEMA, Washington, D.C., 1994, 1997
  7. Park, R, 'Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing', Bulletin cf the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.2, No.3, 1989, pp.155-166
  8. Portland Cement Association, Notes on ACI 318-99 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, Skokie, Illinois, 1999